Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Why is what important to me?
We're in a spiritual warfare, Confused; and the enemy is marching on holy ground waiving the Darwin banner on a pole of a transitional fossil.
Evolution is a form of voodoo, where their priests don't wear skulls as necklaces; but they do display them just as prominently:
Debate it is, commit one fallacy, insult, be condescending, pseudo-intellectual, use words beyond my comprehension then do not make definitions layman, be disrespectful, make something not understandable(which is a cheap shot) even after asked to, hide any knowledge, not admit when you are wrong, refuse to demonstrate something when asked to, or any fallacious and disingenuous thing and the debate is over, and you are disqualified.
you have to convince me and prove beyond reasonable doubt that nothing other than common descent can be demonstrated.
So yes, I accept. create the debate.
How so? say the required amount of Transitional Fossils is fulfilled(it is not, something for another day/post), we can easily assume that YHWH made all those species... similar, so it appears like an evolve, take Playstation Consoles for Example(just an example, don't commit a fallacy and take the example literal), the PS1, PS2, and PS3 for example,
it all starts from the PS1, but did the PS3 evolve and descend from the PS2 and so forth? No, they were individually designed by human beings, one better and more advanced than the other, likewise,
Apes, Humans, birds, etc, even if there were supposed "Transitional Fossils" that make it appear as if everything slowly evolved, it is not proof, why? because with the same fossils we can theorize, Just as we theorize that they evolved, that they were designed... Similar, some better than the other, and it appears as if they evolved(like the Playstation analogy)
The evolution hypothesis is not required and therefore fossils called "transitional fossils" offer no proof for one species evolving into a new/different species as they could have just been designed this way.
The evolution hypothesis is not required and therefore fossils called "transitional fossils" offer no proof for one species evolving into a new/different species as they could have just been designed this way.
Because of the rocks they're found embedded in ... right?
This assumes life has been around that long,
Common Ancestor has been observed?
Which means it's a possible theory and transitional fossils aren't proof for one species evolving into a new/different species.
"obvious conclusion" means faith,
How many T. Rexes have you found over this entire planet? one? two?How is it that we can not find a T. rex buried above igneous rock that has a ratio of isotopes consistent with just 5 million years of radioactive decay?
How many T. Rexes have you found over this entire planet? one? two?
And what is the ratio of T. Rexes to igneous rock? 10:100,000,000?
Then I think I'll just take your point with a grain of sand.Around 30.
But how about all other dinosaurs (excluding birds, of course)? How come NONE of them have been discovered conformably above a marker bed of <65 million years age?
I think it's about the same ratio as the number of flowers to clouds.
How many T. Rexes have you found over this entire planet? one? two?
And what is the ratio of T. Rexes to igneous rock? 10:100,000,000?
I've lost my marbles . . .
Then I think I'll just take your point with a grain of sand.
If you think not finding a T. Rex in igneous rock is some kind of selling point for evolution, then ... well ... I'll just issue my favorite line here:
Keep looking.
Because that's where they were?In every case they are below rock of 65 million years old. Why is that?
Until a coelacanth bites you in the rear end, or someone gets small pox -- then PR department goes to work to reestablish accuracy somehow.We are, and the theory of evolution keeps making accurate predictions...
Until a coelacanth bites you in the rear end, or someone gets small pox -- then PR department goes to work to reestablish accuracy somehow.
Because that's where they were?
You have "around 30" T. Rexes ... all found below deck on a planet the size of the earth -- and you think these 30 are indicative of the entire race?
I found a hub cap in a parking lot once.
Then I think I'll just take your point with a grain of sand.
If you think not finding a T. Rex in igneous rock is some kind of selling point for evolution, then ... well ... I'll just issue my favorite line here:
Keep looking.
Actually no AV.Why is what important to me?
We're in a spiritual warfare, Confused; and the enemy is marching on holy ground waiving the Darwin banner on a pole of a transitional fossil.
Evolution is a form of voodoo, where their priests don't wear skulls as necklaces; but they do display them just as prominently:
Because that's where they were?
You have "around 30" T. Rexes ... all found below deck on a planet the size of the earth -- and you think these 30 are indicative of the entire race?
I found a hub cap in a parking lot once.
Then I found another hub cap in another parking lot.
You know what I concluded?
Hub caps can only be found above the K-T layer.
Why is what important to me?
We're in a spiritual warfare, Confused; and the enemy is marching on holy ground waiving the Darwin banner on a pole of a transitional fossil.
Evolution is a form of voodoo, where their priests don't wear skulls as necklaces; but they do display them just as prominently:
A lot more than that, not including the related species, like Albertosaurus and Tarbosaurus, etc. I wonder how many fossils would be enough for you? Also, please note they are found in sedimentary rock, not igneous rock.How many T. Rexes have you found over this entire planet? one? two?
Whatever does the ratio have to do with anything?And what is the ratio of T. Rexes to igneous rock? 10:100,000,000?
That's too easy a setup and I'm not going to touch it with a ten foot pole...I've lost my marbles before on a playground; and never did find them to this day.
What's that say to you?
Too late, God cleaned it all up and dumped the coccoliths in a pile over in Dover England.Then I think I'll just take your point with a grain of sand.
If you think not finding a T. Rex in igneous rock is some kind of selling point for evolution, then ... well ... I'll just issue my favorite line here:
Keep looking.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?