Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Transitional Fossil Features
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PapaZoom" data-source="post: 68230572" data-attributes="member: 342011"><p>With so many transitional forms necessary I would expect a good sampling.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But it's not about one species but a multitude. And we don't have a fair representation given the number of different species. And as far as birds go, I find it interesting that studies indicate that birds arose in a "big bang" explosion of their own. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I probably shouldn't use "fully developed" but rather "unique" body plans. Add to that "complex anatomical features." </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23206146" target="_blank">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23206146</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I accept it as a possibility but could there be another explanation? And where are other examples of eye development of the eye? Perhaps light sensitivity didn't lead to the development of the eye but was simply a primitive survival trait to stay out of the light and keep in the shadows.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>True but it's not clear that that is what has been observed. It seems that that particular fish has a fin anatomy that is similar to fish today.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PapaZoom, post: 68230572, member: 342011"] With so many transitional forms necessary I would expect a good sampling. But it's not about one species but a multitude. And we don't have a fair representation given the number of different species. And as far as birds go, I find it interesting that studies indicate that birds arose in a "big bang" explosion of their own. I probably shouldn't use "fully developed" but rather "unique" body plans. Add to that "complex anatomical features." [URL]http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23206146[/URL] I accept it as a possibility but could there be another explanation? And where are other examples of eye development of the eye? Perhaps light sensitivity didn't lead to the development of the eye but was simply a primitive survival trait to stay out of the light and keep in the shadows. True but it's not clear that that is what has been observed. It seems that that particular fish has a fin anatomy that is similar to fish today. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Transitional Fossil Features
Top
Bottom