Top Democrat Donor Pleads Guilty in $145 Million Fraud Scandal Over Woke Scheme

[Always in His Presence]

Top Democrat Donor Pleads Guilty in $145 Million Fraud Scandal Over Woke Scheme​

According to media reports based on data from political donation watcher Open Secrets, Sanberg donated thousands upon thousands of dollars to a slew of Democratic candidates. “Sanberg has given money to candidates such as former President Barack Obama, former Vice President Kamala Harris, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), former Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and others,” the New York Post reported.​

​

Taking aim at Sanberg in a press release, the Department of Justice began by saying, “Joseph Neal Sanberg, 45, of Orange, the co-founder and largest shareholder of the financial and sustainability services company Aspiration Partners, Inc., was arrested today on a federal criminal complaint alleging that he conspired to defraud two investor funds of at least $145 million.”​

​

Continuing, the statement noted that Elon Musk attacker Ibrahim AlHusseini pleaded guilty, saying, “Sanberg’s coconspirator, Ibrahim Ameen AlHusseini, 51, of Venice, pleaded guilty today to an information charging him with wire fraud for falsifying documents and information to assist Sanberg. According to his plea agreement, signed on February 7, 2025, and unsealed today, AlHusseini personally received approximately $12.3 million in payments from the scheme. AlHusseini is scheduled for sentencing on September 29, 2025.”​

​

 

[Always in His Presence]

I wonder why he was attacking Elon Musk?

 

[essentialsaltes]

How does he qualify as a "Top" 'Democrat' Donor?

Looks like a few hunderd grand over the last 25 years.

 

[essentialsaltes]

I wonder why he was attacking Elon Musk?

I dunno, but it wasn't government fraud. They defrauded their investors.

 

[Always in His Presence]

I dunno, but it wasn't government fraud. They defrauded their investors.

Fraud is fraud and this to the tune of 145 million. Perhaps since Elon is exposing fraud - he got nervous and decided to attack him.

 

[essentialsaltes]

Perhaps since Elon is exposing fraud - he got nervous and decided to attack him.

How did his coconspirator attack Musk? The rightwing sources seem a bit vague. This doesn't seem all that "virulent": 'People are turned off of Tesla because of Musk's tweets.'

Tesla’s brand is tarnished, says FullCycle’s Alhusseini​

 

[Hans Blaster]

Top Democrat Donor Pleads Guilty in $145 Million Fraud Scandal Over Woke Scheme​

According to media reports based on data from political donation watcher Open Secrets, Sanberg donated thousands upon thousands of dollars to a slew of Democratic candidates. “Sanberg has given money to candidates such as former President Barack Obama, former Vice President Kamala Harris, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), former Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and others,” the New York Post reported.​

​

Taking aim at Sanberg in a press release, the Department of Justice began by saying, “Joseph Neal Sanberg, 45, of Orange, the co-founder and largest shareholder of the financial and sustainability services company Aspiration Partners, Inc., was arrested today on a federal criminal complaint alleging that he conspired to defraud two investor funds of at least $145 million.”​

​

Continuing, the statement noted that Elon Musk attacker Ibrahim AlHusseini pleaded guilty, saying, “Sanberg’s coconspirator, Ibrahim Ameen AlHusseini, 51, of Venice, pleaded guilty today to an information charging him with wire fraud for falsifying documents and information to assist Sanberg. According to his plea agreement, signed on February 7, 2025, and unsealed today, AlHusseini personally received approximately $12.3 million in payments from the scheme. AlHusseini is scheduled for sentencing on September 29, 2025.”​

​

What is a "woke scheme"? How does a scheme become "woke"? Either my understanding of the right's usage of the word "woke" is broken or it is now just a meaningless adjective tacked on to anything the RW commentariat doesn't like.

 

[Always in His Presence]

What is a "woke scheme"? How does a scheme become "woke"? Either my understanding of the right's usage of the word "woke" is broken or it is now just a meaningless adjective tacked on to anything the RW commentariat doesn't like.

The article is pretty plainly stated - you would have to address your inquiries to the author - of whom I am not.

 

[Pommer]

Dead thread

 

[Hans Blaster]

The article is pretty plainly stated - you would have to address your inquiries to the author - of whom I am not.

It really isn't. (That was horrible site. Poorly designed, ads everywhere. Plus for bonus this 'news article' was actually labeled "political commentary". Hahaha.)