Top 10

[CardinalBaseball]

What are your top ten evidences against evolution?

 

[Critias]

Only one is necessary. The Bible.

 

[CardinalBaseball]

Ok, besides the Bible.

 

[Critias]

Hard for me to just cast the Bible aside, sorry.

 

[CardinalBaseball]

Ok, just letting you know, I believe in creation. If you had to narrow it down to one, I would agree, the Bible. But what are the top 10 things that science has disproven evolution?

 

[MatthewDiscipleofGod]

What are your top ten evidences against evolution?

I'll just list 10 things off the top of my head.

1. Reading the Bible in context would show that macroevolution can not be true.

2. Science has shown that mutations and natural selection are limited to what they can do. They can't add the information needed to give dinosaurs wings even after millions or billions of years.

3. Many dating methods point to a young earth, going contrary to popular evolutionary belief.

4. Many church reformers and fathers believed in a young earth, many in a literal 6 - 24 hour day creation.

5. The fasinating things we see in nature make more sense if they were created by some intelligent creator, not natural processes.

6. There was no death and suffering before the fall of Adam and Eve.

7. The fossil record makes sense with a world wide flood taking place.

8. Rock layers we see make sense with a world wide flood.

9. There is much evidence from the Bible and outside the Bible that man and dinosaur lived together at one time.

10. Many evolutionists believe man is still evolving. Just look around you and tell me that with a straight face.

 

[Remus]

What are your top ten evidences against evolution?

So called "convergent evolution"
Irreducible complexity
The human brain

There's a start.

 

[CardinalBaseball]

I'll just list 10 things off the top of my head.

1. Reading the Bible in context would show that macroevolution can not be true.

2. Science has shown that mutations and natural selection are limited to what they can do. They can't add the information needed to give dinosaurs wings even after millions or billions of years.

3. Many dating methods point to a young earth, going contrary to popular evolutionary belief.

4. Many church reformers and fathers believed in a young earth, many in a literal 6 - 24 hour day creation.

5. The fasinating things we see in nature make more sense if they were created by some intelligent creator, not natural processes.

6. There was no death and suffering before the fall of Adam and Eve.

7. The fossil record makes sense with a world wide flood taking place.

8. Rock layers we see make sense with a world wide flood.

9. There is much evidence from the Bible and outside the Bible that man and dinosaur lived together at one time.

10. Many evolutionists believe man is still evolving. Just look around you and tell me that with a straight face.

Good ten, but please explain:

7. The fossil record makes sense with a world wide flood taking place.

 

[MatthewDiscipleofGod]

When I say fossil record I mean:

1. Cambrian Explosion

2. Red blood cells in dinosaur fossils

3. Lack of intermediate fossils

4. A world wide flood would cause a lot of fossilization

5. Fossils where fish are in the middle of eatting other fish

None of these in themselves disprove macroevoltion. In fact my top 10 list doesn't totally disprove macroevolution. The list though should make evolutionists think twice and take a serious, nonmocking look at the possibility of a special creation.

 

[mixin machine]

The human brain

That's a good one Remus . I was trying to picture a single cell organism mutating into something as complex as a brain....

 

[Remus]

That's a good one Remus . I was trying to picture a single cell organism mutating into something as complex as a brain....

That is an amazing feat. Evolution can't even explain how the human brain evolved from the supposed primate ancestor.

 

[CardinalBaseball]

When I say fossil record I mean:

1. Cambrian Explosion

2. Red blood cells in dinosaur fossils

3. Lack of intermediate fossils

4. A world wide flood would cause a lot of fossilization

5. Fossils where fish are in the middle of eatting other fish

None of these in themselves disprove macroevoltion. In fact my top 10 list doesn't totally disprove macroevolution. The list though should make evolutionists think twice and take a serious, nonmocking look at the possibility of a special creation.

I see.

 

[Grengor]

EDIT: deleted

 

[Dexx]

1. Reading the Bible in context would show that macroevolution can not be true.

2. Science has shown that mutations and natural selection are limited to what they can do. They can't add the information needed to give dinosaurs wings even after millions or billions of years.

3. Many dating methods point to a young earth, going contrary to popular evolutionary belief.

4. Many church reformers and fathers believed in a young earth, many in a literal 6 - 24 hour day creation.

5. The fasinating things we see in nature make more sense if they were created by some intelligent creator, not natural processes.

6. There was no death and suffering before the fall of Adam and Eve.

7. The fossil record makes sense with a world wide flood taking place.

8. Rock layers we see make sense with a world wide flood.

9. There is much evidence from the Bible and outside the Bible that man and dinosaur lived together at one time.

10. Many evolutionists believe man is still evolving. Just look around you and tell me that with a straight face.

Points 3,7,8,9 have been falsified.

 

[shernren]

1, 5 and 6 are up for grabs. 2 is answerable hypothetically if not practically at this moment - but then again, so are questions about the curvature of spacetime, which almost all educated Christians believe in despite never actually having seen spacetime curve. 10 shows a gross misunderstanding of evolution and its predictions.

 

[Critias]

Is it that hard to let some people state their reasons without coming in with posts that you know will start a debate in a non-debating forum? This is like children who cannot just let another child be.

 

[JohnR7]

What are your top ten evidences against evolution?

Well, there is common sense and reason. There are extinctions and explosions. Not all evolutionary theory is defunct, but a lot of it is.

 

[KerrMetric]

Ah, ignore the question.

 

[vossler]

Well, we're able to talk about evolution, so I guess the answer is yes.

 

[MatthewDiscipleofGod]

Points 3,7,8,9 have been falsified.

Your argument carries as much weight as me saying the gap theory, which is your view according to your profile, has been falsified.