• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
23,789
14,240
59
Sydney, Straya
✟1,427,172.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
http://www.ccel.org/php/disp.php3?authorID=schaff&bookID=encyc11&page=463

and

http://www.online-literature.com/tolstoy/
 
Upvote 0

Suzannah

A sinner
Nov 17, 2003
5,151
319
69
✟23,324.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Odd that such a man could come to these conclusions. Reminds me of GK Chesterton who said that madness follows those who are incessantly logical/rational.

The madman is not the man who has lost his reason. The madman is the man who has lost everything except his reason. The madman’s explanation of a thing is always complete, and often in a purely rational sense satisfactory. Or, to speak more strictly, the insane explanation, if not conclusive, is at least unanswerable; this may be observed specially in the two or three commonest kinds of madness. If a man says (for instance) that men have a conspiracy against him, you cannot dispute it except by saying that all the men deny that they are conspirators; which is exactly what conspirators would do. His explanation covers the facts as much as yours. Or if a man says that he is the rightful King of England, it is no complete answer to say that the existing authorities call him mad; for if he were the King of England that might be the wisest thing for the existing authorities to do. Or if a man says that he is Jesus Christ, it is no answer to tell him that the world denies his divinity; for the world denied Christ’s.

(G.K. CHESTERTON Orthodoxy, p. 222.)
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.