Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Time is an illusion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheWhat?" data-source="post: 76378928" data-attributes="member: 435920"><p>In the simplest sense statefulness pertains to a thing that undergoes, experiences or can be changed.</p><p></p><p>In the stateful interpretation of the physical universe, the difference between now and now + 30 minutes, is found in differences of state, form, configuration, etc. If there is no change of state, there can be no perceptible progression of the passage of time. Progression or reversion through time is achieved only in changes of state.</p><p></p><p>In the stateless interpretation of the physical universe, the universe cannot be changed. The future exists now, so in some strange mathematical sense, it might be possible that two points along the direction of time might be bridged, though from our perspective, if any object were to cross such a bridge, it would cease to exist relatively, and would "slip out" of the present perceptible state of the universe, even if state transition is but a mere illusion.</p><p></p><p>This is not what Einstein's relativity requires. Though, with some additions it is a hypothetical possibility known as an Einstein-Rosen Bridge.</p><p></p><p>It's the fundamental assumptions that may be erroneous and presentism, the stateful interpretation of the physical universe, has never been disproved.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheWhat?, post: 76378928, member: 435920"] In the simplest sense statefulness pertains to a thing that undergoes, experiences or can be changed. In the stateful interpretation of the physical universe, the difference between now and now + 30 minutes, is found in differences of state, form, configuration, etc. If there is no change of state, there can be no perceptible progression of the passage of time. Progression or reversion through time is achieved only in changes of state. In the stateless interpretation of the physical universe, the universe cannot be changed. The future exists now, so in some strange mathematical sense, it might be possible that two points along the direction of time might be bridged, though from our perspective, if any object were to cross such a bridge, it would cease to exist relatively, and would "slip out" of the present perceptible state of the universe, even if state transition is but a mere illusion. This is not what Einstein's relativity requires. Though, with some additions it is a hypothetical possibility known as an Einstein-Rosen Bridge. It's the fundamental assumptions that may be erroneous and presentism, the stateful interpretation of the physical universe, has never been disproved. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Time is an illusion
Top
Bottom