Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Time in deep space
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SelfSim" data-source="post: 74114679" data-attributes="member: 354922"><p>For about <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_in_physics" target="_blank">the third time now</a>:</p><p>For <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_in_physics" target="_blank">the fourth time now</a>:</p><p>I don't think so .. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_in_physics" target="_blank">for the fifth time now</a>:</p><p>Ok .. if you insist .. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_in_physics" target="_blank">for the sixth time now</a>:</p><p></p><p>Re: underlined text: a disrespectful opinion.</p><p>The Wiki quote is science's definition of time .. </p><p>The topic of the thread is: <em>'Time in Deep Space'.</em> </p><p>Time is defined in science as a scalar quantity. It is thus universally applicable .. which makes my response perfectly on-topic.</p><p></p><p>Time is not an object that can be moved around. It is a testable scalar quantity (as explained previously) which tests out well everywhere we perceive.</p><p>It is also one of the dimensions of space-time, which is a property of the universe.</p><p>There are no <em>assumptions</em> needed.</p><p>There are definitions, objective tests and their objective results.</p><p></p><p>The poster responses on the parallax method of measuring distances, is about measuring distances in space .. not time. </p><p>Your OP also made references to measuring distances in space and then conflated it with time. (I don't know where you got the idea the other posters referred to, were talking about time from?)</p><p></p><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_general_relativity" target="_blank">See tests of General Relativity</a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_special_relativity" target="_blank">see tests of Special Relativity</a>. Both have have been well tested. Your claim is erroneous (the links demonstrate that).</p><p></p><p>See above links on GR and SR.</p><p>I don't understand your <em>circular</em> and therefore, <em>illogical</em> reasoning here.</p><p></p><p>See above links to GR and SR tests.</p><p>See above posted links on GR and SR tests.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SelfSim, post: 74114679, member: 354922"] For about [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_in_physics']the third time now[/URL]: For [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_in_physics']the fourth time now[/URL]: I don't think so .. [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_in_physics']for the fifth time now[/URL]: Ok .. if you insist .. [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_in_physics']for the sixth time now[/URL]: Re: underlined text: a disrespectful opinion. The Wiki quote is science's definition of time .. The topic of the thread is: [I]'Time in Deep Space'.[/I] Time is defined in science as a scalar quantity. It is thus universally applicable .. which makes my response perfectly on-topic. Time is not an object that can be moved around. It is a testable scalar quantity (as explained previously) which tests out well everywhere we perceive. It is also one of the dimensions of space-time, which is a property of the universe. There are no [I]assumptions[/I] needed. There are definitions, objective tests and their objective results. The poster responses on the parallax method of measuring distances, is about measuring distances in space .. not time. Your OP also made references to measuring distances in space and then conflated it with time. (I don't know where you got the idea the other posters referred to, were talking about time from?) [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_general_relativity']See tests of General Relativity[/URL] and [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_special_relativity']see tests of Special Relativity[/URL]. Both have have been well tested. Your claim is erroneous (the links demonstrate that). See above links on GR and SR. I don't understand your [I]circular[/I] and therefore, [I]illogical[/I] reasoning here. See above links to GR and SR tests. See above posted links on GR and SR tests. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Time in deep space
Top
Bottom