Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Threatening Iran Today
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ana the Ist" data-source="post: 73971738" data-attributes="member: 302807"><p>Feel free to explain. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Oh....I see the problem. You think your opinions are objective facts. I'm sorry, but that's simply not the case.....</p><p></p><p>You see, there's a between being mistaken about the factual events in the past....and what the correct course of action is now.</p><p></p><p>If Iran is sabotaging boats and suddenly shifting it's missiles into dangerous positions....there's multiple ways to handle that. Some methods are going to be better than others, some worse.....but that analysis is the sort of thing that's better done with more information than we presently have. </p><p></p><p>So again, opinions are fun....but yours doesn't seem very informed. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Are we talking about the same thing here? </p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/show/what-2-senators-took-away-from-intelligence-briefing-on-iran" target="_blank">What 2 senators took away from intelligence briefing on Iran</a></p><p></p><p>"<em>Today's briefing comes at the end of a dramatic few weeks. On May the 5th, after the administration said it received intelligence of a — quote — "imminent attack" on U.S. forces and allies, National Security Adv</em>i<em>ser John Bolton released a statement promising any Iranian attack would be met with — quote — "unrelenting force</em>."</p><p></p><p>Now....as of yet, no attack from Iran. Were they just posturing? Was it bad intelligence?</p><p></p><p>Or did Iran call it off because we told them we see what they're doing and we'll make them pay dearly for it?</p><p></p><p>Time will tell.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ok, since you asked me so nicely....</p><p></p><p>You're the president and after allied boats have been sabotaged and your enemy is shuffling missiles around like it's 3-card monte....you get a report that the same enemy is planning a large surprise attack on you and your allies. </p><p></p><p>You're response to this is "Hey, maybe I should call them up and talk about how we can get a plan in place to let them get some nukes?"</p><p></p><p>And you're asking me to weigh in on that lol?</p><p></p><p>I think your plan would just encourage bolder and more violent behavior from your enemy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ana the Ist, post: 73971738, member: 302807"] Feel free to explain. Oh....I see the problem. You think your opinions are objective facts. I'm sorry, but that's simply not the case..... You see, there's a between being mistaken about the factual events in the past....and what the correct course of action is now. If Iran is sabotaging boats and suddenly shifting it's missiles into dangerous positions....there's multiple ways to handle that. Some methods are going to be better than others, some worse.....but that analysis is the sort of thing that's better done with more information than we presently have. So again, opinions are fun....but yours doesn't seem very informed. Are we talking about the same thing here? [URL="https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/show/what-2-senators-took-away-from-intelligence-briefing-on-iran"]What 2 senators took away from intelligence briefing on Iran[/URL] "[I]Today's briefing comes at the end of a dramatic few weeks. On May the 5th, after the administration said it received intelligence of a — quote — "imminent attack" on U.S. forces and allies, National Security Adv[/I]i[I]ser John Bolton released a statement promising any Iranian attack would be met with — quote — "unrelenting force[/I]." Now....as of yet, no attack from Iran. Were they just posturing? Was it bad intelligence? Or did Iran call it off because we told them we see what they're doing and we'll make them pay dearly for it? Time will tell. Ok, since you asked me so nicely.... You're the president and after allied boats have been sabotaged and your enemy is shuffling missiles around like it's 3-card monte....you get a report that the same enemy is planning a large surprise attack on you and your allies. You're response to this is "Hey, maybe I should call them up and talk about how we can get a plan in place to let them get some nukes?" And you're asking me to weigh in on that lol? I think your plan would just encourage bolder and more violent behavior from your enemy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Threatening Iran Today
Top
Bottom