• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Thoughts on God's sovereignty, omniscience and the laws of physics.

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,299
6,384
69
Pennsylvania
✟954,878.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Mark Quayle said:
the logically self-contradictory constructions of man's supposed thoughts, words thrown carelessly together, doesn't have any relevance as to what God can and cannot do. That something might appear to mean something to us doesn't mean that it is a valid construct.
1. Ha! Well, I guess I deserved that! I don't mean that thoughts aren't actually thoughts. I probably should have just said that what we think of doesn't necessarily constitute anything valid.
2. Well, no. I didn't mean that man's thoughts are necessarily logically self-contradictory; I meant to refer there only to those thoughts that ARE logically self-contradictory.
3. Still, I only meant to refer to those thoughts or statements or meanings that are built of words or concepts carelessly thrown together. I don't know that anything other than that, in the statement needs justified. I think it is self-evident that that happens. (Eg. Whole doctrines are built on the notion of causation by mere chance, which is a self-evidently self-contradictory. Then more not quite logical thoughts are added to it, such as the notion that God would not command what man is incapable of obeying. —But, there are other concepts or teachings so vague as should be obvious to any believer that they were carelessly—and purposely, at that—thrown together, such as the teaching that if a doctrine divides a congregation or separates one believer from another it is therefore false and/or to be avoided at all costs.)
4. But here, once again, you attribute substance to the human concept of randomness. And, again, it is not a question of what God can or cannot do, but whether randomness is a valid notion. Maybe I should say it like this: Why would God WANT to include Randomness into His universe?
5. I think it would behoove all of Christendom to recognize that reality itself is of God's making, and not something to which God must accommodate himself.


More later on the rest of your post, as time and alertness permit.
 
Upvote 0

childeye 2

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
5,927
3,338
67
Denver CO
✟242,628.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I believe there is an Eternal Truth that is the Eternal power. It's a semantical argument as to whether ignorance of that truth constitutes a free will or an enslaved will.
 
Reactions: KevinT
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,299
6,384
69
Pennsylvania
✟954,878.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Concerning blasphemy, my point is not that it is of itself blasphemous to suppose that God can install randomness into his creation. What is blasphemy is one or two of the things implied by that notion. The first is a notion implied by randomness itself —that something operates outside of God's purview. That's bad enough, but it also claims that this thing which operates from outside God's bailiwick impinges on God's creatures, to which influence God must somehow accommodate himself. This is basic denial of God's Omnipotence.

The question here is not whether God is more powerful than randomness, but whether God is Almighty. EVERYTHING is His bailiwick.
 
Upvote 0

KevinT

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2021
859
459
57
Tennessee
✟62,178.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Mark, I think we are both just circling back and repeating our positions.

Here is what I hear you saying
  1. God is all powerful, which includes having all knowledge.
  2. God cannot have something in His universe that He doesn't know, as that would be a limitation of his power.
  3. What a human may consider as randomness, it not truly random in the sense of not being known or knowable to God. Because, again, as God knows everything, nothing can be unknown.
I don't agree with your position, but I want to make sure that I am properly hearing what you are saying.

At this point I would normally walk away from the conversation and agree to disagree with you. But this is a thread that I started and I feel I need to reply to responses to it. So as long as you keep posting, I'll probably keep answering. But I don't think either of us are covering new ground. I have made my best argument, and have failed to convince you. You have likewise made your best argument and have failed to convince me. So perhaps it would be best if we just trust God to be God and do what is right.

KT
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Mark Quayle
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,299
6,384
69
Pennsylvania
✟954,878.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
That is more or less sufficient, for now, but I would add, here, on point 3, just so you understand, that it is not just a matter of the fact that God knows absolutely everything, but that, (and his very nature, I think, is the reason what I'm about to say is true), he CAUSES absolutely everything. In fact, I contend that, logically, he INTENDED all things. That may seem unpalatable, to those who rather vaguely but adamantly appeal to his nature as that of Love, but to me it is inescapable logic.

And if he causes it, whether by long-chain through means, or immediately, it cannot be random. It cannot be uncaused, nor can it happen apart from specific intention. (And, again, and I hope to circle back to earlier posts you made in answer to me, this does not imply lack of choice nor responsibility of the creature.)
 
Reactions: KevinT
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,299
6,384
69
Pennsylvania
✟954,878.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
In regard to fallen man, would that be: Free will is the power to choose, without external force or constraint, what one prefers.
Yes! That's the one.
As distinct from Adam who had the power to make all moral choices, including to be sinless, which power we do not have.

Feel free to clean it up for me.
My only problem with that definition of freewill is that it allows all sorts of inferences. The one that jumps out at me is that it even allows for LIBERTARIAN free will, which claims choices are not a result of external influences. To me, that is simply illogical. And it says without external constraint, which I disagree with, as God always constrains one way or another. It also allows for randomness, which to me is also self-contradictory. So, my problem is not with what it does say, but what it does not disallow.


Mark Quayle said:
I've even heard the poetic but self-contradictory statement by someone who claims to Arminianism but strikes me as more a Pelagian, "There's nothing more sovereign that God can do, than to give up some of his sovereignty [to humanity]!" So the exact meaning or use of the word varies widely.
There's a contradiction of terms in there somewhere.
Ya THINK???
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,485
7,599
North Carolina
✟349,063.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Does allowing for something necessarily mean that it can occur?
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,856
8,382
Dallas
✟1,091,033.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Well that’s one way to interpret those verses but how does that interpretation stand up to other scriptures?

Passages that support free will



“See, I have set before you today life and prosperity, and death and adversity; in that I command you today to love the Lord your God, to walk in His ways and to keep His commandments and His statutes and His judgments, that you may live and multiply, and that the Lord your God may bless you in the land where you are entering to possess it. But if your heart turns away and you will not obey, but are drawn away and worship other gods and serve them, I declare to you today that you shall surely perish. You will not prolong your days in the land where you are crossing the Jordan to enter and possess it. I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, the blessing and the curse. So choose life in order that you may live, you and your descendants,”

‭‭Deuteronomy‬ ‭30‬:‭15‬-‭19‬ ‭NASB1995‬‬





“I will destine you for the sword, And all of you will bow down to the slaughter. Because I called, but you did not answer; I spoke, but you did not hear. And you did evil in My sight And chose that in which I did not delight.””

‭‭Isaiah‬ ‭65‬:‭12‬ ‭NASB1995‬‬



“They have built the high places of Topheth, which is in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire, which I did not command, and it did not come into My mind.”

‭‭Jeremiah‬ ‭7‬:‭31‬ ‭NASB1995‬‬

“Then the LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great on the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. The LORD was sorry that He had made man on the earth, and He was grieved in His heart.”

‭‭Genesis‬ ‭6:5-6‬ ‭NASB‬‬

“But as for Israel He says, " ALL THE DAY LONG I HAVE STRETCHED OUT MY HANDS TO A DISOBEDIENT AND OBSTINATE PEOPLE."”

‭‭Romans‬ ‭10:21‬ ‭NASB‬‬

“You have been severed from Christ, you who are seeking to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace.”
‭‭Galatians‬ ‭5‬:‭4‬ ‭NASB1995‬‬

“And He began telling this parable: “A man had a fig tree which had been planted in his vineyard; and he came looking for fruit on it and did not find any. And he said to the vineyard-keeper, ‘Behold, for three years I have come looking for fruit on this fig tree without finding any. Cut it down! Why does it even use up the ground?’ And he answered and said to him, ‘Let it alone, sir, for this year too, until I dig around it and put in fertilizer; and if it bears fruit next year, fine; but if not, cut it down.’ ””
‭‭Luke‬ ‭13‬:‭6‬-‭9‬ ‭NASB1995‬‬

“Or do you think lightly of the riches of His kindness and tolerance and patience, not knowing that the kindness of God leads you to repentance? But because of your stubbornness and unrepentant heart you are storing up wrath for yourself in the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God,”
‭‭Romans‬ ‭2‬:‭4‬-‭5‬ ‭NASB1995‬‬

“If we endure, we will also reign with Him; If we deny Him, He also will deny us;”
‭‭2 Timothy‬ ‭2‬:‭12‬ ‭NASB1995‬‬

I can post a lot more examples that refute the idea that God controls everything.
 
Upvote 0

KevinT

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2021
859
459
57
Tennessee
✟62,178.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Well that’s one way to interpret those verses but how does that interpretation stand up to other scriptures?
...
I can post a lot more examples that refute the idea that God controls everything.
Any support of this is appreciated.
KT
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,856
8,382
Dallas
✟1,091,033.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Any support of this is appreciated.
KT
Nah I think owe you an apology, i misunderstood your position because I didn’t have time to read the entire post. Sorry about that friend.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,485
7,599
North Carolina
✟349,063.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Well that’s one way to interpret those verses but how does that interpretation stand up to other scriptures?
Passages that support free will
Yes, fallen man has the power to choose what he prefers.
However, what he prefers is self over God, and that is what he will freely choose until he is born again and given a new disposition which prefers God instead.
See post #14.
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,856
8,382
Dallas
✟1,091,033.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Yes, fallen man has the power to choose what he prefers.
However, what he prefers is self over God, and that is what he will freely choose until he is born again and given a new disposition which prefers God instead.
The problem with this idea is that no one is born again until they repent and believe.
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,856
8,382
Dallas
✟1,091,033.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Yes, fallen man has the power to choose what he prefers.
However, what he prefers is self over God, and that is what he will freely choose until he is born again and given a new disposition which prefers God instead.


See post #14.
Nah post 14 is too long and covers too many topics. Why don’t you just make your point? Is God’s kindness and patience leading them to repentance or not?
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,485
7,599
North Carolina
✟349,063.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The problem with this idea is that no one is born again until they repent and believe.
And the problem with that is that spiritually dead men can do nothing spiritual, they can't even understand what those things mean (see) (Jn 3:3-8), for they are foolishness to them (1 Co 2:14), so there is absolutely no repentance and belief without the sovereign new birth by the Holy Spirit.

Jn 3:3-8 is the foundation principle regarding faith and eternal life.
All Scripture relating thereto must be understood in terms of that principle.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,485
7,599
North Carolina
✟349,063.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Nah post 14 is too long and covers too many topics. Why don’t you just make your point? Is God’s kindness and patience leading them to repentance or not?
Nah see post #91.
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,856
8,382
Dallas
✟1,091,033.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Yeah 1 Corinthians 2:16 and as I’ve pointed out to you numerous times read the next 5 verses to understand who Paul was writing to and why.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,485
7,599
North Carolina
✟349,063.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Yeah 1 Corinthians 2:16 and as I’ve pointed out to you numerous times read the next 5 verses to understand who Paul was writing to and why.
In 1 Co 2:14, Paul is referring to "the man without the Spirit," the unregenerate, not born again, who is unable to understand (see) spiritual things (Jn 3:3-8) and, therefore, believe.

It is only the one born again who is "the spiritual man" (1 Co 2:14-15).

In 1 Co 2:16, Paul is addressing "brothers," the born again, for even where there is spiritual life (new birth) there are remainders of carnal affections.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,856
8,382
Dallas
✟1,091,033.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Lol you just said that man has to be regenerated before he can believe and quoted 1 Corinthians 2:16. So you’re saying that we have to receive the Holy Spirit BEFORE we believe. The scriptures say the exact opposite and there’s not a single case recorded anywhere in the scriptures where anyone received the Holy Spirit before they believed.

The “natural man” is someone who sets his mind on the flesh instead of the Spirit. They are people who turn away from God. Anyone can set their mind on the Spirit by humbling themselves and turning to God.

The apostles believed BEFORE they received the Holy Spirit. In Acts 19 the 12 men that Paul baptized and laid hands on believed BEFORE they received the Holy Spirit. In Acts 8 the people in Samaria believed before they received the Holy Spirit.

So how can you say that we must receive the Holy Spirit BEFORE we can believe? Let me guess you’re going to refer me to another post, or are you going to actually answer the question?
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,485
7,599
North Carolina
✟349,063.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
A simple yes or no would’ve answered my question faster than referring me to another post.
Have you stopped beating your friend?
A simple yes or no will answer my question.

Answer to your question: they are leading the elect to repentance.
 
Upvote 0