• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Those unions watching out for their workers...

[serious]

'As we treat the least of our brothers...' RIP GA
Site Supporter
Aug 29, 2006
15,100
1,716
✟95,346.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

Brands I've heard of:
[*]Blue Ribbon
[*]Hostess
[*]J.J. Nissen
[*]Twinkie
[*]Wonder Bread
[*]Colombo
[*]Eddy’s

I haven't personally bought any of those products in years. Eddy's is the only one that has a particularly good reputation and is the last one I've seen bought. 2 years ago. For a party.

If they are even thinking of giving CEOs huge raises after a first bankruptcy (in which the union agreed to pay cuts) then they aren't taking their situation seriously. If I was in that union, I wouldn't be willing to bankroll a second round of executive raises either.
 
Upvote 0

FreeSpirit74

Contra Dancing Pagan Warrior
Mar 15, 2006
2,149
209
50
Troy, NY temporarily displaced to Schenectady, NY
Visit site
✟19,334.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

This is exactly the type of company I work for - all decisions are made inhouse at monthly meetings with the department managers and the company president/owner, who is in the office every single day (we only have the one location). We are an "Inc." not an LLC however , so we do pay Corporate Tax. One thing that really stands out about this company is the longevity of the workforce - there's only 2 of us in the office who've been there less than 20 years(I'm in my 11th year); one guy started there in 1969!
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private

How dare you brings facts and history into this discussion when one can just decry greedy union "workers" who have the temerity to want to get paid for their sweat!




Your boss sounds like a real {bless don't curse}.
 
Upvote 0

Jane_the_Bane

Gaia's godchild
Feb 11, 2004
19,359
3,426
✟183,333.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Politics
UK-Greens
Evil workers who don't want to submit to autocratic rule are evil.

How come that people who'd otherwise regard themselves as paragons of freedom (and even approve of wars abroad to "defend" said freedom) are such staunch champions of absolutism when it comes to business practices?

The highest-ranking members of American companies make up to 350 times as much money per month as their lowest-ranking employee. Now, a certain disparity of income is not only expected but also just (in light of a higher degree of specialized skills being required for higher-ranking jobs, more responsibility has to be borne and so on and so forth), but THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTY TIMES AS MUCH???
There's no way to justify that. Not in an age when many people barely get by in spite of working full-time.
 
Upvote 0

Jane_the_Bane

Gaia's godchild
Feb 11, 2004
19,359
3,426
✟183,333.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Politics
UK-Greens
That said, unions do not act wisely by default, and they may not be the best solution to resolve the inherent injustices of plutocratic capitalism.

It's pretty clear, though, that handing all of the power to those who own the company is a disastrous idea. Several countries tried that (and still follow that approach), with the result that the vast majority of the populace lives in abject poverty while a small elite grows fat on their labour.

Unbridled capitalism is basically (post-)industrial feudalism, except that the serfs/slaves are no longer made complacent with promises of a better afterlife for the poor (as they were in the middle ages), but with promises of (mostly illusory) social permeability. The "rags to riches"-myth is what makes most people look away from all the injustices of the system - for one day, THEY might be the ones who can afford all that decadent splendour and live like kings in some gated community.
 
Upvote 0
T

Thekla

Guest

Sure, but failing flagship lines and a downward sales trend over years coupled with rising costs and mismanagement is a recipe for disaster.
 
Upvote 0
T

Thekla

Guest
Because right now they are forcing the company to close.

Do you know the harassment people face when they don't vote with the union?

Actually, looking at the Hostess story over the last decade, it doesn't seem to be the fault of the unions -- they're just the last link in a long chain.

And given the downward sales trend, huge debt, and general mismanagement it doesn't seem a union agreement could have saved the company.
 
Upvote 0

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
30,726
15,189
Seattle
✟1,181,177.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

TerranceL

Sarcasm is kind of an art isn't it?
Jul 3, 2009
18,940
4,661
✟113,308.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Huh. Must of missed them leaving. Maybe it's because they haven't?

Washington jobs at Boeing


Not exactly because they wanted to keep it there...

How NLRB helped unions shake down Boeing | WashingtonExaminer.com
 
Upvote 0
T

TeddyReceptus

Guest
to what point...til the company has to shut down? That's not being fair that is being vindictive.

To be fair Hostess Brands was on the verge of giving their CEO a pay package of $1.5 million a year base salary after they went into bankruptcy.

That CEO abruptly left, however and Geoffrey Rayburn stepped in to guide them through this bankruptcy.

Here's a quote that may clarify what the union workers were seeing back in March just 3 months after filing Chapter 11:



Further some of the union members prior to the bankruptcy, when the company was in the process of the "run-up" to bankruptcy, hiring lawyers for this apparently started doing some interesting things in regards to executive compensation:


(emphasis added)


(Interestingly enough, apparently Driscoll actually turned down a significant increase in his salary!)


Now whether Hostess actually did manipulate exec pay or not I suppose will be hashed out in later investigations as the creditors will want to learn more.


But people at the bottom often see a completely different group of thugs playing money games.


Unions exist because management is not always looking out for the best interests of the workers. Unions exist to provide those without the kind of power to control pay and future that the executive team enjoys.


It is a balance.
 
Upvote 0

variant

Happy Cat
Jun 14, 2005
23,790
6,591
✟315,332.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single

They make food and junk food. They are going out of business because they can't compete, not because they couldn't lean on their workers more.

Emphasis on more because this is not the first set of wage cuts at the company.

Those parts of the business that were profitable will be sold to turnaround companies and ultimately stick around.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
T

TeddyReceptus

Guest
The problem is the entitlement mentality where people think they have a right to a job.

Please don't refer to this new meme of "entitlement mentality". Remember the reason the Hostess CEO could make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year base salary is NOT because he was out hawkin' Twinkies on the corner. It was because of thousands of hard working people in blue collar positions.

Management gets to drive the ship. When Management makes decisions where the ship goes the workers have to make the ship run. If management fails to see the icebergs (sometimes no one could see the iceberg) or management decides to steer the ship into an iceberg, one cannot then blame the workers for the failure of the company.

If Hostess was having a tough time of it in this economy and the executives might have been larding up on a few extra liferafts for themselves while asking the workers to hang out here on the deck just a few more minutes, it isn't an "entitlement mentality".

Think about these union workers who are now out of a job. They risked far, far far more than the executives. The execs were probably sitting each on a pile of money and the will move onto other companies, but the bakers will be out of a job sitting on a tiny, tiny bit of money if they are lucky and then have to find another baking job.

The reason people strike is usually not because they are whiny and petulant. It is because they have hit the limit and there really is little to lose for them.

The "entitlement mentality" is probably more at the top. These folks seem to think that sitting in meetings all day "earns" them hundreds of thousands of dollars base salary (and often ridiculous bonuses).

The jobs belong to the owners of the companies who took the risks and put their blood sweat and tears into building the businesses.

And Leroy Nafziger, who founded Interstate Bakeries in the 1930's...you think he's still around? Well he wasn't the last CEO and he isn't the current CEO.

As my boss says, if the employee doesn't like his situation, he can find another situation (or build his own company).

And if your boss doesn't realize that his paycheck is also due to your work then your boss's company is likely to be shortlived.
 
Upvote 0
T

TeddyReceptus

Guest
Simple answer - outsource all the work to Mexico.

Even highly profitable companies started outsourcing work long ago.

Why? Because Americans are expensive. Who can understand why these leeches want to earn a good living in the richest nation on earth, but for some reason they do.

Executive pay is now about 200times the average worker pay. That's because each CEO is working 200 times harder than any person on the production line. Each CEO puts in 200*40 = 8000 hours a week of work. Each CEO produces, directly 200 times more material than any worker.

And when the CEO's go home (or take the corporate jet...along with the wife and kids...which is allowed under some compensation packages) to get some rest it is well deserved.

I mean for someone who puts in 8000 hours a week in work, well that's hard!
 
Upvote 0

Jeffwhosoever

Faithful Servant & Seminary Student
Christian Forums Staff
Chaplain
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Sep 21, 2009
28,211
3,938
Southern US
✟487,806.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married

Greed and envy of executive pay will always be prevalent among those who have no experience in such positions.
 
Upvote 0
T

TeddyReceptus

Guest
Greed and envy of executive pay will always be prevalent among those who have no experience in such positions.

LOL.

So you think a CEO on average actually "earns" 200 times more than the average worker at their company?

Really?

Could you please explain to me how this works? I have no experience as an executive. I have, however worked at companies in which executives make millions of dollars regardless of which way the stock goes. I even read an SEC document in which a CEO of one company got help with his mortgage despite pulling down hundreds of thousands of dollars base pay and millions in total comp.

Please explain to me what a CEO does that is not only starting off at 200 times average worker pay and doesn't seem to have much in the way of accountability or "downside" if things don't go just perfectly on the Street.

I'm truly curious!
 
Upvote 0