• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Those unions watching out for their workers...

MSBS

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2002
1,860
103
California
✟18,091.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian


Then the union/employees needed to realize that they are working for a company that is losing customers, and that in order to stay competitive, they needed to take pay cuts. Regardless of who is at fault, how does it help any of the employees to be out on their butts without a job now? At the very least, it would have benefited them to take the hit and keep working while they explored other employment opportunities. As it stands, now a bunch of people with similar skills are all going to be looking at once, in a crappy job market.

And, as union workers, they were probably making a pretty good wage and had decent benefits. Good luck to them finding anything even close to what they were making in this job market.

http://money.cnn.com/2012/11/16/news/economy/hostess-jobs/
 
Upvote 0

TheBear

NON-WOKED
Jan 2, 2002
20,653
1,812
✟312,481.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
To me, it looks like the execs knew the company was going under, last year, and decided to give themselves a huge chunk of change before the gravy train ended, then filed bankruptcy, then was exposed so they rolled back their pay, then asked the workers to take a pay cut, and now their done.
 
Upvote 0

Vylo

Stick with the King!
Aug 3, 2003
24,768
7,823
44
New Jersey
✟212,869.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others

The issue is the workers being asked to take a cut while the management receive raises instead, including a 300% pay bump for their CEO. That's insane. The increase in his salary could have paid for nearly another 40 middle wage workers.
 
Upvote 0

TheBear

NON-WOKED
Jan 2, 2002
20,653
1,812
✟312,481.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I'm suddenly realizing what a huge boon this is for my company. We are doing well and are in the same area of business. Chances are some of those brands and workers are coming our way.

Is your company union or non-union?
 
Upvote 0

Rion

Annuit Cœptis
Site Supporter
Oct 26, 2006
21,869
6,275
Nebraska
✟419,198.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single

Actually, I was mistaken. The unions have been uncooperative since they went into bankruptcy.
 
Upvote 0

PreachersWife2004

by his wounds we are healed
Site Supporter
May 15, 2007
38,620
4,181
51
Land O' 10,000 Lakes
✟106,590.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
kermit said:
You are attempting to take the culmination of a series of misteps, over many years, by the company and place it all at the feet of the Bakers Union.

Because right now they are forcing the company to close.

Do you know the harassment people face when they don't vote with the union?
 
Upvote 0

Vylo

Stick with the King!
Aug 3, 2003
24,768
7,823
44
New Jersey
✟212,869.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Is your company union or non-union?

Non-union mostly. Some plants have unions in them though.

Unions are great for us as they keep our pay high, but we aren't paying dues ourselves .

Our company isn't immune to the greed that pervades much of large corporations, but they do have a comparatively better track record by a large margin. The disparity in pay isn't nearly as great between management and workers, the family takes a relatively meager profit margin in order to keep expanding, and the managers aren't kept tucked away somewhere. You walk by their desks on your way to your workstations, you are in the locker rooms with them. They are still your boss, but you feel like you can talk to them, and I really do think that creates a better environment, where workers aren't just numbers and production values, but people. Bosses won't hesitate to come down on you if you screw up, but are reluctant to fire for simple "cost cutting" reasons.

They also seem to take considerable interest in promoting people's growth. There are well paying hourly jobs in the plant, and they want people's goals to be to get there at minimun before retirement.
 
Upvote 0

MSBS

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2002
1,860
103
California
✟18,091.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
The issue is the workers being asked to take a cut while the management receive raises instead, including a 300% pay bump for their CEO. That's insane. The increase in his salary could have paid for nearly another 40 middle wage workers.

Excepting that those raises where all rolled back last year, with some of the execs taking pay cuts down to $1 a year.

Regardless, even if it's all true, how does 18500 people out on their butts without jobs help any of that?
 
Upvote 0

TheBear

NON-WOKED
Jan 2, 2002
20,653
1,812
✟312,481.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Excepting that those raises where all rolled back last year, with some of the execs taking pay cuts down to $1 a year.

Regardless, even if it's all true, how does 18500 people out on their butts without jobs help any of that?

It could be poor management. Or, maybe they're hocking garbage in a day and age where people are more health conscience. Or maybe the competition pushed them out of the marketplace. Or maybe a combination of all.

Scoop up those Twinkies and Ho-Ho's while the gettin is good. Many markets are sold out already!
 
Upvote 0

Vylo

Stick with the King!
Aug 3, 2003
24,768
7,823
44
New Jersey
✟212,869.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Excepting that those raises where all rolled back last year, with some of the execs taking pay cuts down to $1 a year.

Regardless, even if it's all true, how does 18500 people out on their butts without jobs help any of that?

Thing is, they rolled them back, but were willing to give them in the first place. That says something about their priorities, and finance is apparently not one of them.
 
Upvote 0

Vylo

Stick with the King!
Aug 3, 2003
24,768
7,823
44
New Jersey
✟212,869.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
The reason I ask is union workers get an average of 28% higher wages than non-union workers in the same industry. If your company increased it's entire payroll by 28%, what would be the impact?

We pay about the going union rate actually. I've seen several union positions for my job that are below my current payscale.

Our business pays based on cost of labor, aka what other people in the area are paying for similar or same jobs.
 
Upvote 0

TheBear

NON-WOKED
Jan 2, 2002
20,653
1,812
✟312,481.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
We pay about the going union rate actually. I've seen several union positions for my job that are below my current payscale.

Our business pays based on cost of labor, aka what other people in the area are paying for similar or same jobs.

That's good. I got that 28% figure from the SEIU. Your company seems like one of the rare exceptions to the rule.
 
Upvote 0

SimplyMe

Senior Veteran
Jul 19, 2003
10,639
10,389
the Great Basin
✟403,532.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Given Hostess' product line, and greater consumer awareness about nutritional value, it doesn't seem like they could remain a stand-alone company anyway (see their sales trends in the article ...)

Twinkies were mediocre and hideously unhealthy. Why people here think that Hostess failed primarily due to a strike than their product being terrible is beyond me.

Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner

You need to look at what Hostess actually is. It is much more than just Twinkies; Twinkies is just getting all the attention because of it being a part of Americana.

The brands owned by Hostess that are now out of business are:

  • Baker's Inn
  • Beefsteak
  • Blue Ribbon
  • Bread du Jour
  • Butternut Breads
  • Colombo
  • Cotton’s
  • Di Carlo
  • Dolly Madison
  • Drake's
  • Dutch Hearth
  • Eddy’s
  • Good Hearth
  • Holsom
  • Home Pride
  • Hostess
  • J.J. Nissen
  • Merita
  • Millbrook
  • Mrs. Cubbison'sFoods
  • Nature's Pride
  • Parisian
  • Standish Farms
  • Sweetheart
  • Twinkie
  • Toscana
  • Wonder Bread
They didn't only make junk food that was empty calories.
 
Upvote 0

Trogool

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2012
2,839
90
✟3,694.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Green

The only brand I recognized was wonder bread and that only by reputation.

Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner
 
Upvote 0