Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
By our liberal friends, yes. Of course, those are the same friends who refuse to recognize that companies using non-union labor like Little Debbie are still able to compete
A gradual winding down of all departments and operations with the exception of the finance department. That department will actually be busier which is why I said to keep the CFO around. But there really no operation decisions to be made so sack the COO. There's really no IT decsions to me made so sack the CIO. There's no long-term company decsions to me made so sack the CEO.The liquidation is expected to take at least a year so you downplaying the management needs doesn't seem to hold much water. Perhaps you can detail for us what the company needs to do in that year.
What exactly, do you think management is there for, if not to adjust product lines to meet the needs of the market? Your head is buried deeply in....the sand, if you can't even assign management one of their most obvious jobs.
Even more bizarre is that despite you making the claim that management isn't responsible for adjusting to market changes, you still think their exorbitant salaries are justified, although you have yet to cite any particular skill that justifies these salaries, and clearly, increased responsibility or "skin in the game" isn't the basis, as they profit when the company fails, and apparently have bear no responsibility of the success or failure of the company.
In fact, if the company's failure rests on the workers' shoulders, you have again demonstrated that they are even more underpaid, as the workers, and not management, are solely responsible for a company's success or failure - at least according to you.
I'm still waiting for someone to tell us what adjustments Hostess could have made? Tofu cupcakes maybe?Adapting the company to a changing market is exactly what management is responsible for.
I really want to know what you think management is responsible for. After reading through this thread it appears that you beleive they have not responsibilities which makes me wonder how you self-justify their larger salaries.
I'm still waiting for someone to tell us what adjustments Hostess could have made? Tofu cupcakes maybe?
So because a bunch of people who are not experts in the junk food industry don't know exactly what changes could have saved Hostess such a solution doesn't exist?I'm still waiting for someone to tell us what adjustments Hostess could have made? Tofu cupcakes maybe?
In other words, you can tell us that Hostess should have changed but can't tell us how they should have changed. That's what I thought. Kind of like armchair quarterbacking.So because a bunch of people who are not experts in the junk food industry don't know exactly what changes could have saved Hostess such a solution doesn't exist?
I'm still waiting for someone to tell us what adjustments Hostess could have made? Tofu cupcakes maybe?
More armchair quarterbacking?Maybe if i was actually hired as management, i would do the activities that they should have been doing. You know, market research, adjusting product lines to accommodate the needs of the market. But, as an outside observer, all i will say is: it's plain to see that they failed to do their jobs.
Moreover, as they failed to do their jobs, they got rewarded for it, and you support them getting rewarded for it.
Apparently for you, Mach:
company in bankruptcy = management doing their jobs just fine
I do like the fact that you keep on arguing this Mach, even though it's clear for all to see that your argument has no teeth. A true right wing ideologue.
So because a bunch of people who are not experts in the junk food industry don't know exactly what changes could have saved Hostess such a solution doesn't exist?
Fan A: The team lost becuase they made some bad plays.In other words, you can tell us that Hostess should have changed but can't tell us how they should have changed. That's what I thought. Kind of like armchair quarterbacking.
OK, if you believe you have better knowledge of how Hostess could have remained solvent, tell us what you would have done as management
I know exactly what it looks like. It looks like a company that it still in business.If you're going to say that someone didn't do their job right, it seems you would know what "doing their jobs right" would look like.
So no suggestions for what Hostess could have done. Got it.I never claimed that superior knowledge. But then I don't claim that skill set and I don't get paid that kind of money precisely because OTHER PEOPLE PRESUMABLY DO CLAIM THAT SKILL SET.
I work on a project in industry. I am set goals to develop a product that meets customer needs. I can't tell you how many times I've been to a customer site in England and they said "We want X, but we don't really care about Y" and then go to a customer site in Australia only to have them say "We reallyl value Y and don't care about X"
The job of management and marketing is to know at least somewhat what a customer wants. We give them big pay rates precisely for this.
I'm just a chemist. So when I'm out in the field and I've got a "fix" for a problem with my coating that I'm pleased as punch with, imagine how frustrated I am to find out that this customer over here doesn't give a hang about it.
This is reality. THIS is what consumer facing industry faces every day.
I am like the union baker. I'm told what to bake. The thing I'm told to bake is based on "market research".
I'm curious if you've never been in a business meeting where decisions are made on what projects to fund and what "engineering metrics" are to be met.
Becuase I guarantee you it is a very detailed process.
Facepalm all you like, but if you don't know how consumer facing businesses actually function your "defense" of management is just about value-less.
Such as?
More armchair quarterbacking?
If you're going to say that someone didn't do their job right, it seems you would know what "doing their jobs right" would look like.
So tell us what they should have done to stay in businessI know exactly what it looks like. It looks like a company that it still in business.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?