• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Those darned Mesozoic mammals...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Assyrian

Basically pulling an Obama (Thanks Calminian!)
Mar 31, 2006
14,868
991
Wales
✟42,286.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Maybe the Flood hydrologically sorted them based on their jaw arrangements. You know, critters with better jaws float longer than critters with lousier jaws.
I looked up 'sort' in a thesaurus and it is another word for 'kind'. That proves it.
 
Upvote 0

gluadys

Legend
Mar 2, 2004
12,958
682
Toronto
✟39,020.00
Faith
Protestant
Politics
CA-NDP
I noticed a link to this article when checking out the story on the early mammal

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,,2032480,00.html

I think this is the kind of article creationists need to see more of. It shows that we can learn so much more from fossils than is commonly understood and that we didn't need to be there in person to figure out what happened.
 
Upvote 0

Mallon

Senior Veteran
Mar 6, 2006
6,109
298
✟30,412.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
I think we should post more popular science articles like this here. I run across numerous palaeo articles several times a week. The theory of evolution gets such a bad rap among YECs for not being science, but the amount of research being generated strongly suggests otherwise. I ran into a great article the other day, in fact, that discusses a new fossil find that supports the monophyly of Afrotheria, a clade that was previously only supported by molecular analyses. Cut from the abstract:

"The phylogenetic pattern and timing of the radiation of mammals, especially the geographical origins of major crown clades, are areas of controversy among molecular biologists, morphologists and palaeontologists. Molecular phylogeneticists have identified an Afrotheria clade, which includes several taxa as different as tenrecs (Tenrecidae) , golden moles (Chrysochloridae), elephant-shrews (Macroscelididae), aardvarks (Tubulidentata) and paenungulates (elephants, sea cows and hyracoids). Molecular data also suggest a Cretaceous African origin for Afrotheria within Placentalia followed by a long period of endemic evolution on the Afro-Arabian continent after the mid-Cretaceous Gondwanan breakup (approx. 105-25 Myr ago). However, there was no morphological support for such a natural grouping so far. Here, we report new dental and postcranial evidence of Eocene stem hyrax and macroscelidid from North Africa that, for the first time, provides a congruent phylogenetic view with the molecular Afrotheria clade."

This is another great example of different realms of science coming together in agreement over evolution (i.e., multiple attestation).
 
Upvote 0
G

GratiaCorpusChristi

Guest
Mallon said:
I think we should post more popular science articles like this here. I run across numerous palaeo articles several times a week. The theory of evolution gets such a bad rap among YECs for not being science, but the amount of research being generated strongly suggests otherwise.

I think that's a fantastic idea.

I know virtually nothing about science whatsoever and mostly allow the scientific consensus on evolutionary biology to govern my anthropology because I honestly see no biblical or theological reason not to.... so not only would it be a great idea for the YECs, but you might help out a friend, too!
 
Upvote 0

Jadis40

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2004
963
192
51
Indiana, USA
✟54,645.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

gluadys

Legend
Mar 2, 2004
12,958
682
Toronto
✟39,020.00
Faith
Protestant
Politics
CA-NDP
Along those lines, I found two more stories:

A link that describes an entirely new species of cat:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/03/070315075842.htm

And another link that describes a snail-like creature:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/03/070312091713.htm


Whee! Good ole ROM! They have a marvellous set of Burgess Shale fossils on public display. I wonder if this one will be in it next time I go there. The ROM is less than 30 minutes away from me by streetcar.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.