Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
This is not a personal attack...just a point
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jerry Smith" data-source="post: 770411" data-attributes="member: 2568"><p>That is a whole 'nuther debate. For the affirmative:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.bible.org/docs/soapbox/1john5-7.htm" target="_blank">http://www.bible.org/docs/soapbox/1john5-7.htm</a></p><p></p><p>and </p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.simplebiblestudies.com/NT1john5threebear.htm" target="_blank">http://www.simplebiblestudies.com/NT1john5threebear.htm</a></p><p></p><p>For the negative:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.chick.com/ask/articles/1john57.asp?FROM=biblecenter" target="_blank">http://www.chick.com/ask/articles/1john57.asp?FROM=biblecenter</a></p><p></p><p>and</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.wayoflife.org/fbns/vindicationof.htm" target="_blank">http://www.wayoflife.org/fbns/vindicationof.htm</a></p><p></p><p>Obviously Lucaspa doesn't feel 1 John 5:7 is authentic (his words clearly indicate that he rests his case with those who take the Johannine Comma as an interpolation: "There is no <strong>genuine</strong> verse in the NT equating all three" - emphasis added). </p><p></p><p>FoC may disagree with Lucaspa on this point, but that does <em>not</em> justify these comments:</p><p></p><p>"This is an huge issue when one tries to teach that which they have little to know knowledge of."</p><p></p><p>and </p><p></p><p>"A person who does not even KNOW what the Bible says, then proceeds to teach that it is wrong in its account based on what they personally believe."</p><p></p><p>Lucaspa has demonstrated no lack of knowledge of 1 John 5:7. He was careful to include the modifier, "genuine", showing his awareness of this passage. Furthermore, I've watched, and Lucaspa has never once taught that the Bible is wrong on any account. He has always professed that YEC creationists are wrong in their interpretation - never that the Bible itself was wrong.</p><p></p><p>You should be more careful when you make - "just a point".</p><p></p><p>&nbsp;</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jerry Smith, post: 770411, member: 2568"] That is a whole 'nuther debate. For the affirmative: [URL="http://www.bible.org/docs/soapbox/1john5-7.htm"]http://www.bible.org/docs/soapbox/1john5-7.htm[/URL] and [URL="http://www.simplebiblestudies.com/NT1john5threebear.htm"]http://www.simplebiblestudies.com/NT1john5threebear.htm[/URL] For the negative: [URL="http://www.chick.com/ask/articles/1john57.asp?FROM=biblecenter"]http://www.chick.com/ask/articles/1john57.asp?FROM=biblecenter[/URL] and [URL="http://www.wayoflife.org/fbns/vindicationof.htm"]http://www.wayoflife.org/fbns/vindicationof.htm[/URL] Obviously Lucaspa doesn't feel 1 John 5:7 is authentic (his words clearly indicate that he rests his case with those who take the Johannine Comma as an interpolation: "There is no [b]genuine[/b] verse in the NT equating all three" - emphasis added). FoC may disagree with Lucaspa on this point, but that does [i]not[/i] justify these comments: "This is an huge issue when one tries to teach that which they have little to know knowledge of." and "A person who does not even KNOW what the Bible says, then proceeds to teach that it is wrong in its account based on what they personally believe." Lucaspa has demonstrated no lack of knowledge of 1 John 5:7. He was careful to include the modifier, "genuine", showing his awareness of this passage. Furthermore, I've watched, and Lucaspa has never once taught that the Bible is wrong on any account. He has always professed that YEC creationists are wrong in their interpretation - never that the Bible itself was wrong. You should be more careful when you make - "just a point". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
This is not a personal attack...just a point
Top
Bottom