Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
Regions of the World
Australian & New Zealand
There were Giants in days of old
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WayonDown" data-source="post: 60210998" data-attributes="member: 305127"><p>I don't really think this thread needed to go any further past the second post. "mathclub" pretty much ended it where it should have. If that was solid rock and someone tried to leave a footprint, the amount of weight (force) that's required to leave an imprint like that would sooner shatter the rock. The other alternative is that it was formed by someone stepping on molten lava (and then staying that for a while while the rock hardened) which is highly unlikely and completely devoid of both reason and any evidence. Who's not to say that some individual with shady motives went and chiseled that out themselves? That print looks awfully fresh.</p><p></p><p>God created an orderly world, full of reason and logic. Faith is one thing, but when you start trying to put your own misguided faith-based ideas into something that is clearly not needing anything like that, you're in error and just water down God-given reason. Insisting that the Earth is 7000-years-old is like insisting the Earth is flat; no one really cares, you can continue believing what you want, luckily it has no impact on progressing scientific research.</p><p></p><p>If you have a big problem with science in general (which by your posts you seem to do) please get off the computer and the internet, don't dabble with anything that is a product of scientific endeavour, and by the way, the Earth being millions and millions of years old is not a 200-year-old theory.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WayonDown, post: 60210998, member: 305127"] I don't really think this thread needed to go any further past the second post. "mathclub" pretty much ended it where it should have. If that was solid rock and someone tried to leave a footprint, the amount of weight (force) that's required to leave an imprint like that would sooner shatter the rock. The other alternative is that it was formed by someone stepping on molten lava (and then staying that for a while while the rock hardened) which is highly unlikely and completely devoid of both reason and any evidence. Who's not to say that some individual with shady motives went and chiseled that out themselves? That print looks awfully fresh. God created an orderly world, full of reason and logic. Faith is one thing, but when you start trying to put your own misguided faith-based ideas into something that is clearly not needing anything like that, you're in error and just water down God-given reason. Insisting that the Earth is 7000-years-old is like insisting the Earth is flat; no one really cares, you can continue believing what you want, luckily it has no impact on progressing scientific research. If you have a big problem with science in general (which by your posts you seem to do) please get off the computer and the internet, don't dabble with anything that is a product of scientific endeavour, and by the way, the Earth being millions and millions of years old is not a 200-year-old theory. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
Regions of the World
Australian & New Zealand
There were Giants in days of old
Top
Bottom