Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What part of "bunnies" applies to theology ?Sometimes there really is a bunny.
However, since bunnies cannot be proven theologically, but they exist .. this creates a heretical paradox.
First find a scripture verse with bunnies in it.What part of "bunnies" applies to theology ?
So anything a person sees can be proven as Theology?Sure you can prove the existence of bunnies ... It's in the same "ball park" as .. "I think, therefore I AM", = I exist.
Isn't that what God said, " I AM, That I AM " = God. I can walk off my front porch in the mornings and often, bunnies will scamper away ..
Since God created all these "critters" and Adam got to name them, "Bunnies" ... and I can walk out my door and bump into a "critter" .. doesn't that prove, "Theology" ? God said ... Therefore it is ! = Theology
Ya Think?
"Hare" will do the job.First find a scripture verse with bunnies in it.
Thanks, I forgot about that verse."Hare" will do the job.
Lev 11:6..."And the hare, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he is unclean unto you."
The words street-car, and elevator are not...by your definition...theological either.
And that makes no difference in my daily life.
Instead of using the word "theological", perhaps you should use the word "biblical".Thanks, I forgot about that verse.
Also, I think a good point has been touched on in this thread, though I did not receive an answer to my question regarding it.
My grandson was chasing one about as big as my fist in my backyard this very afternoon. The bunny managed to stay out of grandson's reach without too much trouble.Sometimes there really is a bunny.
And worse, they, a long with the groundhogs and deer, pose an existential threat to my wife's Korean vegetable garden.However, since bunnies cannot be proven theologically, but they exist .. this creates a heretical paradox.
Biblical sounds funny when I say it, similar to Bubblical.Instead of using the word "theological", perhaps you should use the word "biblical".
What, by the way, is your definition of "theological" ?
Only if it can lay eggs.I'll swap you an armadillo for it.
Go fish.I'll see your bunny and raise you a platypus
God created rabbits, therefore rabbits are theological !Theological is study of God, so the study of anything God does is within bounds. The parables are evidence of this.
God didn't create sin. This was introduced into creation by humans, yet this too is theological.God created rabbits, therefore rabbits are theological !
A better question may be...what is NOT theological ?
This implies that believers in Christ who believe in God without reservations are irrational. This can be read as flaming your fellow Christians.The fact is, rational believers accept the possibility that theology could be wrong.
You know, sometimes there really is a bunny.Sometimes there really is a bunny.
However, since bunnies cannot be proven theologically, but they exist .. this creates a heretical paradox.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?