• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Each of these stories has its purpose but as literal story they can't be reconciled.

All history stories are fictional accounts. You can't reconcile fiction, only compare it.
 
Upvote 0

Abraxos

Christ is King
Jan 12, 2016
1,128
617
124
New Zealand
✟79,019.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Disagree. Genesis 1 and 2 are not two different creation accounts but are an explanation of the same creation account. Genesis 1 is talking broadly about what God did from day one to day six, and Gen. 2 talks only about day six about an enclosed area called Eden, and what happened within it.

Gen. 1 as people would have gathered is a general explanation about the creation account of the heaven and the earth, and the creation of all the plants and animals on the earth. You will also notice that the word 'earth' is used frequently. (Genesis 1:11-12) "The vegetation and plants of the earth." "The animals and the beasts of the earth." (Genesis 1:24-25)
Genesis two, on the other hand, is no longer describing what takes place on the earth, rather it is being more specific as "in the field". This may seem like a minor alteration of word usage in the English language, but to a keen eye, it is highly relevant.
The context in chapter 2:5, these "plants of the field" are described as "cultivated plants." Chapter 1 certainly mentioned vegetations and fruits, yet the difference with Gen. 2 is that verse 5 is quite clear that these plants of the field need a man to cultivate them, hence, the plants of the field are cultivated plants. Furthermore, 'of the field' can be translated as "cultivated field," and it only stands to reason that gardens contain plants that require cultivation. Verse 8 pretty much verifies that 'plants of the field' is referring to a garden and is cultivated by Adam later in verse 15.

To further reiterate, the field is in a specific location God named Eden; and in Eden God placed a garden there. Now "garden" in Hebrew can also mean an enclosure or an enclosed field; this changed the context to be speaking about specific types of animals, and specific types of birds, and specific types of plants of the field/garden. For example "birds of enclosure" would come to mean "domesticated fowls." It could also be open to animals that are not particularly domesticated but are reliant on the enclosure, like ecosystem gardening and agriculture we see today.

The key point is, Genesis chapter 1 is generally about the creation order from day one to day six, and Gen. chapter 2 is talking specifically about the account on day six. It may certainly appear like two different creation accounts, but once you have a fair understanding of the Hebrew texts and its meanings, it becomes much more profound with a wealth of detail.
 
Reactions: Brihaha
Upvote 0

fwGod

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2005
1,404
530
✟72,762.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
You have to remember that it was written or scribed by Moses as directed by God. So the text isn't going to follow your ideas of how it ought to be presented.

Don't get too hung up on when what happens per day. You'll miss the overall flow if you do. Then your brain will have trouble reconciling the events of the days according to the first mention in the creation week.

The first text of the creation week is the overview. The second text of the creation process is void of what day they happen, and have more detail in each case.

The second part of the creation week the author picks out certain happenings to detail them. Not paying any attention to when they occurred in Genesis one.

I've seen this sort of thing done by authors in books, they're known to do the same thing. Overview. Then the next chapter is details. Then chapter three moves into details about Adam and Eve specifically such as eating from the tree and the various curses.

Not counting the numerical chapters as chapters. The numerations were added much much much later.

Chapters (act) 1 & (act) 2 reconcile themselves as a literary writing or a theatrical play if you will, that sets the scene for chapter (act) three.

Movie directors have done the same. They'd start with the wide view, then move the camera closer, then do the camera shots of a particular character and what he or she is doing. Then you get all caught up in what you're looking at instead of anything else that's around you. As if you've been transported to stand just a few feet from the actual events.

Read it the way that it was intended to be read then you won't be like a stuck gear trying to keep things in order, but you can pick out anything out of sequence to focus on.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

-57

Well-Known Member
Sep 5, 2015
8,701
1,957
✟77,658.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
There's no contradictions in my exegesis of the chapters and I didn't "mess up" anything nor did God. The issue here is the lack of understanding Hebrew verbs and their tenses.
People with an understanding of Hebrew Verb and tenses tell us a "had" is proper.

There is a contradiction with your account as it calls for a date error or tells us God created all the animals twice. I don't think God created all the animals twice.
 
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,489
1,319
72
Sebring, FL
✟828,409.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat


Thanks for your extensive research on what various translations say on this.
 
Upvote 0

JulieB67

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2020
2,056
892
57
Ohio US
✟205,123.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
There are two different creation accounts, you're right. That's why Cain was able to go east of Eden to the land of Nod and found a wife. Although many will tell you he married a sister even though that's not biblical.

Adam and Eve is the line that Christ would come through that's why she specifically is called the mother of all "living." Because without Christ there is no eternal life.

Traditions of men make void the word of God for sure.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ewq1938

Well-Known Member
Christian Forums Staff
Administrator
Site Supporter
Nov 5, 2011
45,301
6,870
✟1,012,348.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
People with an understanding of Hebrew Verb and tenses tell us a "had" is proper.

Had formed is only proper if the verb is in the perfect tense because the perfect refers to something already completed. The verb in question is in the imperfect tense because it was not a reference to a completed action.



There is a contradiction with your account as it calls for a date error or tells us God created all the animals twice. I don't think God created all the animals twice.

God created all kinds of animals in Gen 1, but in Gen 2 he is making animals for the garden. Also note he made no sealife in Gen 2 which is another difference in the two creation accounts.

Gen 2 is a smaller creation account in a smaller place where as Gen 1 details a much larger creation account in a larger area.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,594
52,505
Guam
✟5,127,376.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Gen 2 is a smaller creation account in a smaller place where as Gen 1 details a much larger creation account in a larger area.
I think some people are so quick to find something wrong with the Bible, they overlook the obvious.

They'll search every jot and tittle for just one little error.
 
Upvote 0

ewq1938

Well-Known Member
Christian Forums Staff
Administrator
Site Supporter
Nov 5, 2011
45,301
6,870
✟1,012,348.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I think some people are so quick to find something wrong with the Bible, they overlook the obvious.

They'll search every jot and tittle for just one little error.

They won't find errors in the bible but they can look if they wish.
 
Reactions: AV1611VET
Upvote 0

Erik Nelson

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2017
5,156
1,663
Utah
✟382,550.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
sure you're aware of the Documentary Hypothesis

If God in heaven contacted numerous prophets, who wrote numerous books of the Bible, which being distinct yet mesh together, so the same thing could have happened with the earlier accounts
 
Upvote 0

Bruce Leiter

A sinner saved by God's astounding grace and love
Jun 16, 2018
782
551
82
West Michigan
Visit site
✟64,365.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

No, they're the same creation story, the second adding more details to the first one. If you think about it, the same method happens in other places in the Bible. The accounts of 1 and 2 Kings and 1 and 2 Chronicles are the same history from two viewpoints. The same is true for the four gospels.
 
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,489
1,319
72
Sebring, FL
✟828,409.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat



FwGod,

I assume that your name is short for Follow God. Excellent.

FwGod: "You have to remember that it was written or scribed by Moses as directed by God."

When the Bible was written, you honored people by naming books after them, even if they didn't write it. We know that Deuteronomy wasn't written by Moses because Moses died and was buried by God in the last chapter. Moses wouldn't have been around to write it.

It is my understanding that names of books like Genesis and Exodus are taken from the titles that translators gave them in the Septuagint. The title of the book is not as old as the text.

Many have believed, or assumed, that the first five books of the Bible were written by Moses but the New Testament gives a different impression.

In the following passage, Jesus is debating with the Pharisees, and Jesus is speaking.

22 Yet, because Moses gave you circumcision (though actually it did not come from Moses, but from the patriarchs), you circumcise a boy on the Sabbath. 23 Now if a boy can be circumcised on the Sabbath so that the law of Moses may not be broken, why are you angry with me for healing a man’s whole body on the Sabbath?
John 7:22-24 NIV

22 Moses gave you circumcision (not that it is from Moses, but from the fathers), and you circumcise a man upon the sabbath. 23 If on the sabbath a man receives circumcision, so that the law of Moses may not be broken, are you angry with me because on the sabbath I made a man’s whole body well?
John 7:22-24 RSV

Here Jesus Himself tells us that circumcision should not be thought of as a command written down by Moses but as a tradition from "the fathers" or "the patriarchs."


FwGod: "The first text of the creation week is the overview. The second text of the creation process is void of what day they happen, and have more detail in each case."

This doesn't work out. The first creation story frequently refers to the sky and to heavenly bodies. We have "light" and "day" in verses 3-5. We have the sky "vault" in verses 7, 8, 14 and 17. We have the sun, moon and stars in verses 16-18. There is no mention of sun, moon, stars, or light in the second creation story and the sky is mentioned only in connection with birds. We do not find "more detail" on the sky and heavenly bodies.

In the first creation story, God tells the fish, sea creatures and birds to multiply, before people are created.

22 God blessed them and said, “Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the water in the seas, and let the birds increase on the earth.”
Genesis 1: 22 NIV

After people are created, God gives dominion to humans and gives plants to the animals for food.

29 Then God said, “I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food. 30 And to all the beasts of the earth and all the birds in the sky and all the creatures that move along the ground—everything that has the breath of life in it—I give every green plant for food.” And it was so.
Genesis 1: 29 NIV

None of this is found in the second creation story. The command to multiply and the gift of plants for food to animals is omitted. The second creation story does not add to these points that were laid out in the first story, it goes in a different direction.

In the first creation story, God tells the animals to be fruitful and multiply. In the second, God tells Adam not to eat of the forbidden fruit. The commands are different and the accounts are different.
 
Reactions: ewq1938
Upvote 0

fwGod

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2005
1,404
530
✟72,762.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
FwGod,

I assume that your name is short for Follow God. Excellent.
F=filled, w=with, God.
Read the post again, I never mentioned Deuteronomy. I only spoke concerning Genesis, the two creation records which Moses indeed did write.
22 Yet, because Moses gave you circumcision (though actually it did not come from Moses, but from the patriarchs), you circumcise a boy on the Sabbath.
You have deliberately added what is not in any Bible anywhere and then from it claim that is correct and not every Bible printed that doesn't have your inserted portion.

That is a mechanical private interpretation. That is classic eisegesis. That is false theology and false doctrine.

From where-ever you heard that it was the patriarchs.. between them and the words of Jesus.. I conclude that those who said it came from the patriarchs, are wrong.

There is no point in responding to the further of your post.

This discussion is over.
 
Upvote 0

-57

Well-Known Member
Sep 5, 2015
8,701
1,957
✟77,658.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Speculation.
you appear to believe there is error all through out the bible.
 
Upvote 0

JulieB67

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2020
2,056
892
57
Ohio US
✟205,123.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No, they're the same creation story, the second adding more details to the first one. If you think about it,

I don't believe that to be the case. You're talking about different books/letters and authors.
And take the gospels for example, they compliment each other and give a complete picture without contradictions.

Going back to Genesis, it's not only the same book, we have to remember there were no chapters in the manuscripts. So what you're basically saying is that the author wrote the creation account down and then "immediately" wrote the same creation account down -and instead of complimenting each other, there are blatent contradictions to the first. That doesn't make sense. First, why would the author write "back to back" accounts of the same creation and then add the contradictions?
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Dale
Upvote 0

coffee4u

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2018
5,002
2,819
Australia
✟166,475.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
There is but one God and one creation and one death and one judgment.

Exodus 20:11
For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day. Therefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy.
 
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,489
1,319
72
Sebring, FL
✟828,409.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat


Obviously, God only created the world once but more than one creation story has come down to us. Just look at the opening to the second creation story in Genesis 2:4.


4 This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created, when the Lord God made the earth and the heavens.
Genesis 2:4 NIV


This is definitely an introduction to a second story. It is at this point that the name of God changes from "Elohim" to "Jehovah-Elohim."
 
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,489
1,319
72
Sebring, FL
✟828,409.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
The first and second creation stories in Genesis are both composed with an eye to moral instruction. The first concludes :

Thus the heavens and the earth were completed in all their vast array.

By the seventh day God had finished the work he had been doing; so on the seventh day he rested from all his work. Then God blessed the seventh day and made it holy, because on it he rested from all the work of creating that he had done.
Genesis 2:1-3 NIV

We see from Genesis 2:1 that "the heavens and the earth were completed." That means that the first creation story is completed as well. Then we are told that God rested on the seventh day. This is intended to back up the moral commandment of a day of rest. The day of rest means that employers are to give their employees a day off, that families must give their members, and servants, a day off. No one should have to work ceaselessly without rest or time to themselves.

At the end of Genesis Two we find:

But for Adam no suitable helper was found. 21 So the Lord God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man’s ribs and then closed up the place with flesh. 22 Then the Lord God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.

23 The man said,
“This is now bone of my bones
and flesh of my flesh;
she shall be called ‘woman,’
for she was taken out of man.”
24 That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh.
Genesis 2: 20-24 NIV

Here again the creation story is coupled with a moral command. God created Adam and Eve but He did not give Adam two wives and He did not give Eve two husbands. Adam and Eve started as one flesh and after marriage, man and wife once again become "one flesh." The creation of Adam and Eve go together with the command to uphold marriage and refrain from adultery.

The first creation story ends by justifying the command that everyone must be allowed to have a day of rest. The second creation story ends by upholding marriage as a lifelong commitment.
 
Upvote 0

coffee4u

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2018
5,002
2,819
Australia
✟166,475.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

We have already gone over this before.
Genesis 1 outlines what God made each day.
Genesis 2 focus on the garden.
 
Upvote 0