Greetings brothers and sisters.
I not quite sure if this would be in the proper topic, but I wanted to discuss
the creationist defense for how God created man. The book of Genesis informs us that God made us in His image. That means that our natural inclinations were to be like his, our thoughts, feelings, actions, and desires.
Now, many non-believing evolutionists like to accuse Christians of having no physical/scientifical proof. What they fail to realize is that they, themselves, are scientifical proof that God does exists.
I will explain three reasons:
1) As human beings, we do things that are against our animal nature. We limit ourselves to one person even when our natural inclination is to mate with as many mates as possible to ensure the survival of our race.
2) Though they put up with misery after misery, they still keep on living. Hasn't everyone woke up somedays and ask themselves, why am I here? Now, it is a natural instinct to be primarily concerned with one's own survival, which brings me to my next reason:
3) Though they are primarily concerned with self-survival, they strive for a thing called love. They would selflessly give their lives for another, again; acting against their physical nature.
So, if our nature is to survive, yet we go against our nature by believing in love, then we are contradicting ourselves if we go on living without believing in God. It would be vain to put up with life's miseries if you believe in love without God. God Bless.
I not quite sure if this would be in the proper topic, but I wanted to discuss
the creationist defense for how God created man. The book of Genesis informs us that God made us in His image. That means that our natural inclinations were to be like his, our thoughts, feelings, actions, and desires.
Now, many non-believing evolutionists like to accuse Christians of having no physical/scientifical proof. What they fail to realize is that they, themselves, are scientifical proof that God does exists.
I will explain three reasons:
1) As human beings, we do things that are against our animal nature. We limit ourselves to one person even when our natural inclination is to mate with as many mates as possible to ensure the survival of our race.
2) Though they put up with misery after misery, they still keep on living. Hasn't everyone woke up somedays and ask themselves, why am I here? Now, it is a natural instinct to be primarily concerned with one's own survival, which brings me to my next reason:
3) Though they are primarily concerned with self-survival, they strive for a thing called love. They would selflessly give their lives for another, again; acting against their physical nature.
So, if our nature is to survive, yet we go against our nature by believing in love, then we are contradicting ourselves if we go on living without believing in God. It would be vain to put up with life's miseries if you believe in love without God. God Bless.