Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Because we admit it was a miracle. You on the other hand are claiming it was purely natural without Divine intervention..... Therefore you should be able to explain it, while a miracle is by definition unexplainable....
Apparently you don't understand the difference between an initial expansion that satisfies the laws of physics and a continued expansion that is increasing in violation of the laws of physics....
No, you don't, as observed by your next response. See above post.....
Right, right...
Neither do the vast majority of physicists out there, apparantly.
What a wonderfull blessing for the world and humanity and all of science, that we have random internet trolls such as yourself who know and understand all this, so that they can tell actual physicists etc how to do their jobs, ha?
ow, wait.....
Yah I know they can't, that's why they propose magic Fairie Dust because the equations that are 99.8% accurate in the solar system can't be made to work outside of it without 95% fudging......
But you just keep believing that a theory 99.8% accurate needs 95% fudge factors to make it accurate...
lol, you people don't even accept the accuracy of your own theory, do you... or what it is really trying to tell you.... Lol
Why are you here on this puny forum with us mere mortals of average IQ?
Why aren't you giving symposiums in top universities all over the world to educate the entire scientific community on how to do physics?
Because someone has to keep you all from fooling the mere mortals with average IQ.... And I like this puny forum. So why are you here since you apparently think you know more than the one you claim thinks you all are of average IQ?
I think you are quite intelligent, just blinded by your dogma as will be seen below...
But I notice for some reason you keep avoiding explaining why your theory is 99.8% correct inside the solar system without fudge factors, but needs 95% fudge factors outside it?
What, don't you believe in the accuracy of your own theory?????
I mean come on, I thought you believed in the extreme accuracy of General Relativity? So then why do you refuse to accept what that extreme accuracy is telling you????
You're again not answering the question.
If the vast majority of physicists etc are incorrect and YOU are correct, then why aren't you travelling the world as the world's most famous phycisist, giving symposiums in all the top universities to educate working physicists on how to do their job?
I mean, wouldn't that serve the world better then preaching to a bunch of heathens and creationists on some forum on the interwebs that doesn't actually matter to real life?
Did you even bother to read the Sean Carroll page? Because if you had, you'd get your answer including the explanation of what 'GR is telling' us:lol, you people don't even accept the accuracy of your own theory, do you... or what it is really trying to tell you.... Lol
...
What, don't you believe in the accuracy of your own theory?????
I mean come on, I thought you believed in the extreme accuracy of General Relativity? So then why do you refuse to accept what that extreme accuracy is telling you????
And so ..Carroll said:... energy and momentum evolve in a precisely specified way in response to the behavior of spacetime around them. If that spacetime is standing completely still, the total energy is constant; if it’s evolving, the energy changes in a completely unambiguous way.
In the case of dark energy, that evolution is pretty simple: the density of vacuum energy in empty space is absolute constant, even as the volume of a region of space (comoving along with galaxies and other particles) grows as the universe expands. So the total energy, density times volume, goes up.
Carroll said:.. A decrease in energy is just as much a “violation of energy conservation” as an increase in energy, but it doesn’t seem to bother people as much. At the end of the day it doesn’t matter how bothersome it is, of course — it’s a crystal-clear prediction of general relativity.
And one that has been experimentally verified!
9 October 2018 Justatruthseeker: A "continued expansion that is increasing in violation of the laws of physics" lieApparently you don't understand the difference between an initial expansion that satisfies the laws of physics and a continued expansion that is increasing in violation of the laws of physics....
9 October 2018 Justatruthseeker: Gibberish followed by a "plasma that didn't behave like they expected it to in space" lie....Ahh, you mean plasma that didn't behave like they expected it to in space.....
Dusty plasmas are often studied in laboratory setups. The dust particles can be grown inside the plasma, or microparticles can be inserted. Usually, a low temperature plasma with a low degree of ionization is used. The microparticles then become the dominant component regarding the energy and momentum transport, and they can essentially be regarded as single-species system. This system can exist in all three classical phases, solid, liquid and gaseous, and can be used to study effects such as crystallization, wave and shock propagation, defect propagation, etc.
When particles of micrometer-size are used, it is possible to observe the individual particles. Their movement is slow enough to be able to be observed with ordinary cameras, and the kinetics of the system can be studied. However, for micrometer-sized particles, gravity is a dominant force that disturbs the system. Thus, experiments are sometimes performed under microgravity conditions during parabolic flights or on board a space station.
NOTE:
The original commentary is done very unprofessionally, trying to turn the already not-so-difficult subject into a _really_ popular science sensationalist piece. This is very unfortunate. A more professional/scientific crew could've made this video to be much more informative and useful than it is. For that reason I couldn't translate it directly but had to change the translation a bit according to my own understanding which should leave the cosmonauts' and scientists' ideas in but leave the commentator's far-fetched conclusions out. I also wanted to cut out the last part about radiation clouds, but decided that it would be a form of censorship.
NOTE2:
This video has little to nothing to do with so called "plasma cosmology", "electric universe" and similar subjects. I am sad to see that this video is seen as support for these theories and is hence recommended/suggested by YouTube on wrong videos.
To the supporters of "electric universe": I really advise you to find out as much as you can about your theories because they are not a matter of faith, belief or "dogma" as one of the comments read. All physical theories must be a matter of evidence to be considered at least partially true and shouldn't have any contradicting evidence in the region they're supposed to work in. The model presented by you don't fulfill either of these conditions.
9 October 2018 Justatruthseeker: Some % gibberish accidently stumbles across a bit of science!But I notice for some reason you keep avoiding explaining why your theory is 99.8% correct inside the solar system without fudge factors, but needs 95% fudge factors outside it?
The amount of dark matter that affects the planets is tiny in comparison to the Sun, the planets and even big asteroids. The conclusion is that theoretically dark matter does have an effect inside the Solar System but we need > 100,000 times more accurate data to detect it.Should this be so? This was one of the first thoughts I had when I first learned about dark matter, some 17 years ago. Let’s investigate and find out the truth.
...
Values like the one we came up with, in the 10¹³ — 10¹⁷ kg range, are the mass of a single modest asteroid.
...
You might wonder, based on the arrangement of the Solar System, if many-body interactions between dark matter, a planet, and the Sun could cause additional dark matter to be captured by the Solar System. This was a fun problem, and was the topic of a paper I co-wrote some 10 years ago.
9 October 2018 Justatruthseeker: "I thought you believed in the extreme accuracy of General Relativity" ignoranceI mean come on, I thought you believed in the extreme accuracy of General Relativity?
In other words your realization that we use the laws on earth to explain the entire universe just killed your claims it works differently elsewhere and you can't bring yourself to admit it..... I understand.... It's ok..... No, really it is... cough, cough....
How this video solves all of mainstreams "problems" is anyone's guess.What magic plasma?
Ahh, you mean plasma that didn't behave like they expected it to in space.....
At least my magic plasma makes up 99.9% of the universe, while your magic Fairie Dust cant even be observed.....
Ref: https://www.ph.tum.de/academics/org/labs/fopra/docs/userguide-03.en.pdfΓeff = Z² e² exp(−∆/λd))/(4πǫ₀∆kTd)
Here Ze is the average charge per particle, ∆ the mean distance between the particles, λd the Debye screening length (see below), and Td the kinetic temperature of the particles. Plasmas with Γeff > 1 are called strongly coupled. For the crystal formation a critical value Γeff ≃ 100 - 1000 has to be exceeded. Below Γeff the system is in the liquid or gaseous phase.
In addition, the interparticle distance has to be of the same order as the Debye screening length or smaller, i.e., κ = ∆/λd <∼1.
Fact: No scientist has explained how the universe came into being.
There are only two options.
1. It came from nothing.
2. It always existed.
Scientists admit that the first option is impossible. It defies logic.
The second option also defies logic. Some believe in it still. They believe the past is infinite.
Yet you cannot cross an infinite amount of time or distance. And for the PRESENT to exist then the universe would have had to cross an infinite amount of time to get to now.
The two options are illogical. Therefore the universe came about illogically. A miracle.
Some will say "God made it". I do not include this option as it does not solve the problem. We then have to ask how God came about. Like the universe there are only two options, the same options as I list above.
So one miracle happened, so why not others?
I don't think it's reasonable to disregard "Always existed" as illogical, but accept an explanation that has "always existed" as one of its attributes.
You did not. At best, you made a sarcastic comment to avoid answering the question.I already answered that.
Which is why you refuse to answer my question....
But I notice for some reason you keep avoiding explaining why your theory is 99.8% correct inside the solar system without fudge factors, but needs 95% fudge factors outside it?
What, don't you believe in the accuracy of your own theory?????
I mean come on, I thought you believed in the extreme accuracy of General Relativity? So then why do you refuse to accept what that extreme accuracy is telling you????
I'll answer my question to you, for you...
The reason you aren't travelling around the world to lecture actual physicists in all the top universities, is because you actually do NOT know better then them. Because you are nothing but an ignorant, dishonest conspriracy theorist with nothing but fundamentalist religious beliefs that are so far removed from empirical reality, that it's not even funny anymore.
Without GR, GPS wouldn't work. No matter what you say. No matter how dishonest you are. No matter how much you misrepresent the science and engineering involved.
I'll answer my question to you, for you...
The reason you aren't travelling around the world to lecture actual physicists in all the top universities, is because you actually do NOT know better then them. Because you are nothing but an ignorant, dishonest conspriracy theorist with nothing but fundamentalist religious beliefs that are so far removed from empirical reality, that it's not even funny anymore.
Not in the least. Rants and tirades are the first concession that people cant back up their beliefs scientifically and have lost the battle.Ouch.
Not in the least. Rants and tirades are the first concession that people cant back up their beliefs scientifically and have lost the battle.
Instead of hurting as you think it should, it merely confirms that he has realized he has nothing scientific to argue with....
It is a great day here at CE..... two in one day, praise be to God.....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?