Mr Laurier
Well-Known Member
- Mar 26, 2021
- 1,141
- 366
- 59
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Just a moment here.The ToE has fatal flaws, even Darwin saw that. Just one of countless examples: symbiosis. Evolutionists are are unwilling to accept the evidence.
Where in Darwin’s writings is this fatal flaw found? Where did he write that he was abandoning the theory of evolution because he had invalidated it?Sorry, 4.50 am.
Do you think you know what the truth of it is? You seem pretty confident that your interpretation is the correct one.Is that how it was translated (one of the processes of interpretation) into English? It translated itself?
Yes, it is being studied, has been studied fo millenia. The question is, who are you to tell us what the truth of it is?
Pot, meet kettle.Do you think you know what the truth of it is? You seem pretty confident that your interpretation is the correct one.
Who are you to say God didn't leave a book for you to decide what he had in mind? After all, that's exactly what everyone does.Either God gave us a book that we cannot understand and therefore left it up to us to decide what he had in mind (NOT), or God gave us a book that we can study and come to a knowledge of the truth (over time).
I didn't say that. That's a quote from someone elsePot, meet kettle.
You saidWho are you to say God didn't leave a book for you to decide what he had in mind? After all, that's exactly what everyone does.
I'm not. But I am confident that mine is just as consistent with and supportive of essential Christian doctrine as yours. I'm not promoting mine as the only possible true and correct one.Do you think you know what the truth of it is? You seem pretty confident that your interpretation is the correct one.
The issue of salvation is the most important one. A lot of the other disagreements are just people arguing about things that don't matter that much.I'm not. But I am confident that mine is just as consistent with and supportive of essential Christian doctrine as yours. I'm not promoting mine as the only possible true and correct one.
There's a forum for that: this one.The issue of salvation is the most important one. A lot of the other disagreements are just people arguing about things that don't matter that much.
The majority of Germans thought that Hitler was leading them to the promised land. The majority of Russians believe that Putin was justified in invading Ukraine. The majority of North Koreans believe that Kim is the greatest leader ever and some kind of demi-god. The majority is often wrong.
And evolution is taught in schools as if it was fact, at least in the education systems that I know of. Teachers in the US have been fired even for pointing out possible objections to evolution. If the theory is so sound, why the fear of examining possible flaws?
If ToE is so,wrong why do you have to mahe up things toThe majority of Germans thought that Hitler was leading them to the promised land. The majority of Russians believe that Putin was justified in invading Ukraine. The majority of North Koreans believe that Kim is the greatest leader ever and some kind of demi-god. The majority is often wrong. And evolution is taught in schools as if it was fact, at least in the education systems that I know of. Teachers in the US have been fired even for pointing out possible objections to evolution. If the theory is so sound, why the fear of examining possible flaws?
Alas, it would be better if we became feral. Less chance of senseless violence.Extinct -- unless we think of a way of preventing ourselves from becoming feral.
When I was a christian, the accepted position was that Jehova/Yawah had been directing evolution for millions of years, just to get to modern humansThen we could have evolved or God could've created us or we could've evolved with God directing the process or there could've been progressive creationism
How'd that end up?When I was a christian, the accepted position was that Jehova/Yawah had been directing evolution for millions of years, just to get to modern humans
What do you mean?How'd that end up?
Yeah that's not what I believe.When I was a christian, the accepted position was that Jehova/Yawah had been directing evolution for millions of years, just to get to modern humans
When I was a christian, the accepted position was that Jehova/Yawah had been directing evolution for millions of years, just to get to modern humans
How'd that end up?
Indeed it is a dire consequence.What do you mean?
Your question seems to imply some dire consequence.
Thats nice.Yeah that's not what I believe.
So no dire consequence. Just an unrelated factoid.Indeed it is a dire consequence.
Look at your faith setting: it says ATHEIST.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?