Just to point out, we know abiogenesis happened because there is life. What we don't know is how it happened. Hypothesis range from God creating man from dust through to aliens seeding the planet.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I didn't say that I didn't understand the TOE I said I'm not going to argue with people who know more about it than I do. I understand it but I'm not an expert on it. .It's actually abiogenesis that I don't believe just happened. There are elements of TOE like natural selection I believe
Actually, the complexity of life screams time. Billions of years, not thousands.The complexity of life screams design.
By ‘evolutionists’ do you mean scientists?Taking the OP into consideration, evolutionists are on the Titanic.
There was a time when there was no life. Now there is life. That’s called abiogenesis.I don't think it's a proven fact that men and chimpanzees evolved from a common ancestor or that abiogenesis is a proven fact.
Apparently if I question the TOE I'm ignorant dangerous and reject all scienceKinda mean spirited thing to make up.
No signs there that remote viewing- tele mindredaing is
your thing.
I don't believe it just happened by itself. Apparently that means I'm ignorant dangerous and reject all scienceJust to point out, we know abiogenesis happened because there is life. What we don't know is how it happened. Hypothesis range from God creating man from dust through to aliens seeding the planet.
If it's that simple then who doesn't believe it? I don't believe it happened on its own accord. Apparently that means I'm ignorant dangerous and reject all scienceThere was a time when there was no life. Now there is life. That’s called abiogenesis.
Why do you equate the two? If someone questions evolution does that mean they reject all science? I don't. But from what I'm getting on this forum if you question evolution you are ignorant dangerous and reject all scienceBy ‘evolutionists’ do you mean scientists?
I don't believe it just happened by itself. Apparently that means I'm ignorant dangerous and reject all science
And I don't reject scienceNo. I think a cat majority don't think it happened by itself. That has nothing to do with science. Rejecting science would be the claim that it could not happen through a naturalistic process.
If there is a God, he used very defined processes in his creation. Science is simply the search for those processes.
No, it just means you don't believe it happened by itself. But you don't need to reject the theory of evolution because of it.I don't believe it just happened by itself. Apparently that means I'm ignorant dangerous and reject all science
Do I have to accept all of the TOE as a fact to avoid ridicule?No, it just means you don't believe it happened by itself. But you don't need to reject the theory of evolution because of it.
They too.By ‘evolutionists’ do you mean scientists?
Did Neil Armstrong abiogenesis the moon?There was a time when there was no life. Now there is life. That’s called abiogenesis.
And you live in a trailer.Apparently if I question the TOE I'm ignorant dangerous and reject all science.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?