Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If something cannot be demonstrated or tested repeatedly as I pointed out in the OP, but you see no problem with it, then you have left science and entered into a belief system.
How is that testing macroevolution?Nonsense. Every time that a new fossil is dug up and analysed, the theory is being tested.
What I'm looking for (and this was asked of Dawkins), Can you give me an example of a genetic mutation or an evolutionary process which can be seen to increase the information in the genome?
I claim that evolution -- specifically, common descent -- is a fact, and I've said so in this thread already.Please quote the texts/scientists/organisations that claim that evolution is 'fact'...
How is that testing macroevolution?
its clearly that a whale and a cat are a different creatures.
if the theory isnt scientific, then it will never be falsified.
if the theory isnt scientific, then it will never be falsified.
Find the fossil of a primitive mammal with scales. Or feathers. Voila!...the theory will be falsified..!
What would disprove evolution?
Sure. And if water isn't wet, it won't quench your thirst. What's your point? Evolution is a scientific theory, as you might guess from all of the scientists who study it -- in science departments, funded by science funding agencies -- and who then publish on it in the scientific literature.if the theory isnt scientific, then it will never be falsified.
a mammal with scales? what about a mammal with genes for feathers developmant?
Actually it can.No, the Theory of Evolution does not include the Big Bang.
Actually it can.
if the theory isnt scientific, then it will never be falsified.
I'll make it even more specific for you. Show that humans have the genes capable of producing feathers but chimpanzees do not. THEN, my friend, I think we might be on to something.so evolution theory doesnt predict that human for instance will have genes for feathers developmant?
so evolution theory doesnt predict that human for instance will have genes for feathers developmant?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?