Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
The systematic classification of life
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Imblessed" data-source="post: 11036924" data-attributes="member: 80183"><p>Yes i'm impressed with your study though as i've said before you can study for years and still not understand it correctly. I've studied the Bible and see many that totally see it wrong and misinterrprite it into how they want to see it. This is only human nature. But yes according to this process i would be in the class of bilatera. I would also be in every class of animal because we all have simmiliar functions. Its only natural that we would if a creater created every thing. Your insertion that a creator could create a jackolope is true but not needed. A creator would do things correctly. evolution should not if it is random mutations. you would show vestigies as proof of evolution and this randomness and also bad design which i think is funny since you all never seem to be able to find or produce a better one. The vestigials are ignorant and just opinionated as is bad design. But this is my opinion and you can go on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Imblessed, post: 11036924, member: 80183"] Yes i'm impressed with your study though as i've said before you can study for years and still not understand it correctly. I've studied the Bible and see many that totally see it wrong and misinterrprite it into how they want to see it. This is only human nature. But yes according to this process i would be in the class of bilatera. I would also be in every class of animal because we all have simmiliar functions. Its only natural that we would if a creater created every thing. Your insertion that a creator could create a jackolope is true but not needed. A creator would do things correctly. evolution should not if it is random mutations. you would show vestigies as proof of evolution and this randomness and also bad design which i think is funny since you all never seem to be able to find or produce a better one. The vestigials are ignorant and just opinionated as is bad design. But this is my opinion and you can go on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
The systematic classification of life
Top
Bottom