Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
but you asked for creation predictions so i gave you one. if you refer to falsifiability then you can try to prove that a creature can evolve into another kind of creature. but remember that evolution itself cant be test so its not scientific either.I say that you are in over your head, you dont understand the basics and cannot therefore answer incredibly basic questions that has to be answered if its science.
great. so what is the difference between this and that?:
but you asked for creation predictions so i gave you one. if you refer to falsifiability then you can try to prove that a creature can evolve into another kind of creature. but remember that evolution itself cant be test so its not scientific either.
Since creation involved more than the natural, it cannot be falsified only by the natural!
so a car and a truck basically share the same level of similarity?
you just tets it with 14 traits. when in re ality we should check the entire object.
as i showed before: many of such independent characteristics exist in vehicles too: most trucks have a mudflap and most cars dont. most trucks have big wheels and most cars dont. many trucks have a reverse beeper and most cars dont (if any). although those traits can be exist in cars usually they dont.
Not in any way would time need to exist the same as here for something to move. You see time is only observed at one point in the universe...here. We do know time exists here, and how much time is involved in moving here. One example is it seems to have taken days for you to almost make a point.
To folks who are not aware of the big picture and all that is involved, basing all things on haplessly partial info might seem cool. Others see the willing ignorance in such ritualistic abuses of intelligence and honesty.Then its a worthless "model".
Since I have defined the fishbowl as the solar system, and area, it is right in the heart of here actually.And yet you claim that light takes eight minutes to get to here from the Sun, which, in case you missed it, is not "here."
"This" is not a unique, consistent, well-supported tree. "That" is.
I was not saying you did not make a good point, it is just that that question in this forum is absurdum as infintum because a Creator with no beginning or end would neither arise naturally (being the maker of that which is called Nature) or be designed since design was His idea (it started with Him/It)
I was not saying you did not make a good point, it is just that that question in this forum is absurdum as infintum because a Creator with no beginning or end would neither arise naturally (being the maker of that which is called Nature) or be designed since design was His idea (it started with Him/It)
s
so basically you are saying that a watch isnt an evidence for design. i guess that most peoples will claims otherwise.
Got it. You are just going to parse our posts into chunks and just repeat the same nonsense, hoping that the rubes are impressed that you keep getting the last word in. I don't have time for that so I am just going to just tell you how it is.Forget spacetime existing in the far universe. That equals fishbowl time and space. Try to stick to what you know.
Drawing lines on a paper is one thing, drawing a line that involves time to the stars is quite another. That is slate of hand, not trig.
So far you have offered no proof that the earth had the same physics. Make no claims based on a belief that earth did have the same physics.
Any true story about the future or far past would NEED to defy the temporary physics of the present on earth.
so you hypothesized that the laws of nature were the same back then. But the other option is that your story is fiction and God's record is true.
So go ahead and parse this into bits with stupid comments after each sentence to impress the rubes. That means nothing. Meanwhile science marches on.
Since I have defined the fishbowl as the solar system, and area, it is right in the heart of here actually.
He actually claimed 8 seconds. But that's probably right using dad-physics.And yet you claim that light takes eight minutes to get to here from the Sun, which, in case you missed it, is not "here."
You seem to believe this -- but why? Have you seen time on the Sun?
Well, if you are calling 'here' in reference to what time is like anything else than the defined area, you are talking nonsense asking how we know time exists here.And your definition is worth what, exactly?
You are here to try to impress? So how do you get that done, agree with whatever religion that called science says without pause or question?Considering dad even gets into it with other creationists, I wonder who he's really impressing on these forums. Does *anyone* agree with his views?
No, let's give science credit for what is actually knowable, measured, and observed in this here lovely little fishbowl we live in. Man has sent a probe almost a whole light day away. Don't try to take that from them.He actually claimed 8 seconds. But that's probably right using dad-physics.
It is evidence someone made it. That may not be as good as what God made but it is designed.A watch is not good evidence. DNA though is good evidence for intelligent design.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?