Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Carry on with willful destruction of the environment? How will you defend that if he does arrive?Talking about all believers in God here:
Anyone who thinks they can force God's hand
is ignorant of who is God and who is the servant.
We are to carry on until he arrives, not just until
we think the signs are right.
if they have the same design traits why not? a ufo for instance is an imaginary object. but we know for sure that if we will find such an object we will conclude design.So if an object which exists only in your imagination can't evolve, then an object which exists in reality can't evolve either? Right.
http://www.talkdesign.org/faqs/flagellum.htmlExcept that the flagellum can evolve: Evolution of the bacterial flagellum
Self replicating watches don't exist.
"Design traits" are not necessarily evidence of intelligent design.if they have the same design traits why not? a ufo for instance is an imaginary object. but we know for sure that if we will find such an object we will conclude design.
not realy. they start with a protein export system. such a system is already a complex system that cant evolve stepwise. so their model is false just from the beginning.
but a self replicating motor does exist. and both are evidence for design.
It was in 2011 when the 9.0 earthquake hit Fukushima Nuclear plants the Lord gave me "beginning of the end."
is it a multicellular animal ufo, or a ufo made out of mechanical parts?if they have the same design traits why not? a ufo for instance is an imaginary object. but we know for sure that if we will find such an object we will conclude design.
a ufo for instance is an imaginary object.
but we know for sure that if we will find such an object we will conclude design.
The paper in question isn't "how they are made", but rather how the flagellum could evolve.
See above. If it's possible for the flagellum to evolve, then it clearly can't be evidence for design.
And since it appears possible to evolve, therefore it is not evidence for design.
Yes, a fictional account, because there is no way
to prove it happened in the past or that it could
ever happen today or in the future.
Trump.Who is defending it? And who is in a position to
either stop it or allow it to carry on?
so what about this one?:UFO just means Unidentified Flying Object. It simply means something that is flying and we don't know what it is.
We don't.
If for example a UFO turns out to be something like a meteor, animal or other natural object then we wouldn't conclude it was artificially designed.
is it a multicellular animal ufo, or a ufo made out of mechanical parts?
But that wasn't your claim. You claimed specifically that the bacterial flagellum couldn't evolve. If it's possible to evolve from another precursor system, then clearly the flagellum can evolve and your objection is irrelevant.
Which step isn't small? Please cite the specific part of the process which you have a problem with giving an explanation of why you think it is a problem.no. i said that it cant evolve by small steps. and these arent small steps.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?