Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Design can be ruled in when we see something had to be designed.
You have no more proof of that, than claiming they were always the same.
We do have ancient history records, and there was nothing about life in old England, or Rome that supports your claim.
Because they are ridiculous religious nonsense that cannot be defended or supported.
do you agree that most parts of a truck is also shared between other truck but not a bicylce? if so then you get your statistical significance since the basic tree (truck is more silimlar to other truck) still exist.
lets assume just for the sake of the argument that we indeed found such hierarchy among vehicles. in this case you will not conclude design when you see a truck?
so now you actually admit that a truck isnt more similar to another truck then a car?.
tell me: its also true for a car and a bicylce?
I know the feeling.It is not so much that I agree with him as much as that I disagree with you.
It does not matter if some fossils evidence evolving. What matters is in what nature the evolving happened, and whether creation started it all off.
I must have missed it when you provided verifiable evidence for your 'different states past' assertions. They are not science.I must have missed it when you provided verifiable evidence for your 'same states past' assertions.
Meanwhile, in real life, science marches on.
To be clear...I think a lot of evolution happened. It happened to created kinds, and started happening at creation about 6000 years ago.If fossils are evidence for evolution--and indeed they are--then that does matter. Evidence matters.
Can we agree that evolution happened? Regardless of what nature you think existed, do you at least agree that evolution happened?
You think creation started it all off. Lots of people believe evolution, but think creation started it.
Wrong. Common sense and intelligence tell us that a watch was created. Claiming the precise master machine of the stars and life and earth were NOT created is argument from incredulity, and ignorance."Had to be designed" is nothing but an argument from personal incredulity.
Tell us about the "design" of the female hyena's pseudopenis.
I disagree there was no creation of life, and that the evolving that did happen was after the fact. I disagree that you have any clue what variety of life existed on earth when early fossils were formed. I disagree that the fossil record is a record of life on earth, and deduce instead that it is a partial record of only certain types of life. I disagree that you can use genetics to determine common ancestors in the former nature years. I disagree that your little evo tree is a tree of life and observe instead that it is lobotomized, religious doctrine based insult to God and intelligence.That might mean more if I was confident you knew what you were disagreeing with.
Explain what math you use that negates similarities in creations of man?That's not how statistical significance works. Again, checking for statistical significance is a mathematical calculation. You don't just arbitrarily declare something statistically significant.l organisms. It doesn't even make sense to try to construct them for non-living things in the first place.
Right, but you cannot tell me if the horse and the donkey are the same kind. You cannot tell me if the zebra and eohippus are the same kind. You cannot tell me if the bear and the lion are the same kind. Perhaps the fish and the hippo are the same kind.To be clear...I think a lot of evolution happened. It happened to created kinds, and started happening at creation about 6000 years ago.
Right, but you cannot tell me if the horse and the donkey are the same kind. You cannot tell me if the zebra and eohippus are the same kind. You cannot tell me if the bear and the lion are the same kind. Perhaps the fish and the hippo are the same kind.
What was the starting point for evolution? Why can it not be the first cell?
I saw the first 10 minutes and I knew within the first five, why his argument was void. Watched the other five to see the responses. Pretty sure they are actors.Watch this. Creation needs a creator. Evolution is a faith not fact.
"The Atheist Delusion" (Movie) - Why Millions Deny the Obvious
That's about as convincing as any other Ray Comfort nonsense. A pile of PRATTs, arguments from incredulity and misrepresentations of actual science.Watch this. Creation needs a creator. Evolution is a faith not fact.
"The Atheist Delusion" (Movie) - Why Millions Deny the Obvious
And yet you credit "The blind watchmaker", that is, evolution, as being responsible for some of that design. You say that God started with created kinds and the rest evolved from there. How much evolved from there? You won't even guess.Design can be ruled in when we see something had to be designed.
I must have missed it when you provided verifiable evidence for your 'different states past' assertions. They are not science.
Meanwhile, in real life, the truth marches on.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?