• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Uphill Battle

Well-Known Member
Apr 25, 2005
18,279
1,221
48
✟23,416.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
So you guys don't find formulaic prayer an abomination to our Lord?
Read the words of Isaiah

tut tut.

that removes the context.

following in the same chapter:

15When you(AH) spread out your hands,
I will hide my eyes from you;
(AI) even though you make many prayers,
I will not listen;
(AJ) your hands are full of blood.
16(AK) Wash yourselves; make yourselves clean;
remove the evil of your deeds from before my eyes;
(AL) cease to do evil,
17learn to do good;
(AM) seek justice,
correct oppression;
(AN) bring justice to the fatherless,
plead the widow’s cause.

the issue is not with the repeated offerings (and in fact, the Jewish style of worship was fairly regimented) but because it was completely hypocritical.
 
Upvote 0

simonthezealot

have you not read,what God has spoken unto you?
Apr 17, 2006
16,461
1,919
Minnesota
✟27,453.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Not the repeated but the vain formulaic (loveless) approach to it.
 
Upvote 0

polishbeast

Servant of Jesus
Apr 14, 2008
1,430
68
35
UCF
✟16,939.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Not the repeated but the vain formulaic (loveless) approach to it.

formulaic =/= loveless

formulaic is not always vain.

the Rosary is not entirely formulaic, you also meditate on the mysteries while praying it, allowing for a different experience each time.
 
Upvote 0

Uphill Battle

Well-Known Member
Apr 25, 2005
18,279
1,221
48
✟23,416.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Not the repeated but the vain formulaic (loveless) approach to it.

that makes som might big suppositions into the spiritual disposition of someone else, doesn't it?

the Rosary for Me WOULD be in vain.... I'd probably do it by rote, and it would be worthless.

it may be very profitable for someone else. I don't know.

besides, it's hardly like this aspect is limited to the Rosary.

Lord, we give thanks for the bounty that we are about to receive, injesusnameamen.

see?
 
Upvote 0

Catherineanne

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2004
22,924
4,646
Europe
✟84,370.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Widowed
What are your feelings about praying a Rosary? For me it is one of the most calming prayers to do and brings me very close to Christ. I was wondering if protestants have an issue with the Rosary they could explain why.

Higher Protestants have no problem with the Rosary. Lower ones do.

Why? Mostly because lower churches are not too keen on anything which focuses on Mary, and takes attention off Our Lord. Higher churches are happy to respect both.

 
Upvote 0

Uphill Battle

Well-Known Member
Apr 25, 2005
18,279
1,221
48
✟23,416.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
I get what you're saying Catherineanne.

I've always hated the "Higher" and "lower" church distinctions though. Almost like a religious "back of the bus" mentality. dont' get me wrong I'm not picking on you about it... just it irks me every time I see it...
 
Upvote 0

Catherineanne

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2004
22,924
4,646
Europe
✟84,370.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Widowed

What you are describing is a Buddhist prayer wheel. I think it is rather bizarre to call it a vain repetition; who says that Buddhist prayers are not heard? The Bible certainly makes no such assertion.

Tibetan Prayer Wheel - Buddhist Things - ReligionFacts
 
Upvote 0

Catherineanne

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2004
22,924
4,646
Europe
✟84,370.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Widowed

I understand but it doesn't bother me. It is just a description, like a compass reference. It is pointless trying to say we are all the same when the two differ in pretty well every aspect of theology and worship.
 
Upvote 0

simonthezealot

have you not read,what God has spoken unto you?
Apr 17, 2006
16,461
1,919
Minnesota
✟27,453.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

Uphill Battle

Well-Known Member
Apr 25, 2005
18,279
1,221
48
✟23,416.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
I don't know... the image I saw of a guy reading a magazine while spinning the wheel brought to mind vain repetition.

I understand but it doesn't bother me. It is just a description, like a compass reference. It is pointless trying to say we are all the same when the two differ in pretty well every aspect of theology and worship.
"Kraut" is a descriptive word for a German. "frog" is a descriptive term for a frenchman. etcetera etceterea.

"High" and "low" describe more than just a difference in aspects, IMO. I take it you are "high" church?
 
Upvote 0

Catherineanne

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2004
22,924
4,646
Europe
✟84,370.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Widowed
I don't know... the image I saw of a guy reading a magazine while spinning the wheel brought to mind vain repetition.

Judge not lest ye be judged.

"Kraut" is a descriptive word for a German. "frog" is a descriptive term for a frenchman. etcetera etceterea.

Those are not descriptives but perjoratives. High and low are not perjorative, but descriptive. Well, they are to me, anyway. No value judgement included.

"High" and "low" describe more than just a difference in aspects, IMO. I take it you are "high" church?

I am indeed high church, or Anglo Catholic if you prefer. How did you guess?
 
Upvote 0

Uphill Battle

Well-Known Member
Apr 25, 2005
18,279
1,221
48
✟23,416.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Judge not lest ye be judged.
true enough.

I guess I'm just looking at it in the context of Christian prayer... whether or not THAT would be considered vain repetition... if a Christian did it. I don't know what is in the persons heart... just visually offputting.


Those are not descriptives but perjoratives. High and low are not perjorative, but descriptive. Well, they are to me, anyway. No value judgement included.
true... but I'm betting some in the "low" church don't see it the same way. and I'm not ascribing motive to those who use it. I'm just expressing how it "sounds" to me, that's all!

[/quote]
I am indeed high church, or Anglo Catholic if you prefer. How did you guess? [/quote]
instinct.

thanks for replying!
 
Upvote 0

Catherineanne

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2004
22,924
4,646
Europe
✟84,370.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Widowed
true enough.

I guess I'm just looking at it in the context of Christian prayer... whether or not THAT would be considered vain repetition... if a Christian did it. I don't know what is in the persons heart... just visually offputting.

Not only do we not know what is in their heart, we also don't know what was in that magazine.

true... but I'm betting some in the "low" church don't see it the same way. and I'm not ascribing motive to those who use it. I'm just expressing how it "sounds" to me, that's all!

Given that they have no aspiration whatever to be high, and regard low as the only possible way to be, it is unlikely that they think that 'low' equates to a perjorative term. I know it sounds hierarchical, but it isn't at all. No more than left and right when talking about politics.

Remember 'Methodist' and 'Quaker' both started out as perjoratives, but the people they were applied to declined to take offence, and instead embraced those terms for themselves. We have to choose to feel belittled, in other words. A low church person might choose to try to call me high as a term of contempt. But if I say in response, 'thank you very much; that is most kind', then they do not succeed. We don't have to let other people control our emotional responses, in other words.
 
Upvote 0

CaliforniaJosiah

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2005
17,496
1,568
✟229,195.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
(Note: words embolden and in red font are not original but are mine)


I have a beautiful Rosary, and I have said it many times. I've even taught it to others - both Protestant and Catholic.

My "issues" with it are two-fold:

1. The red embolden words in the quote above; all post 1521 additions.

2. This is just a PERSONAL thing, but the mere repetition of it makes me zone out - and thus excludes any blessings. When I did it, it would take a LOT to stay focused. I have the same criticism with some contemporary Christian songs ("Yes, Lord, Yes, Lord, Yes, Yes, Yes" repeated 4,672,356 times!). But that's just me; hey, if it blesses you - go for it.



Thank you.


Pax


- Josiah




.
 
Upvote 0

Polycarp1

Born-again Liberal Episcopalian
Sep 4, 2003
9,588
1,669
USA
✟33,375.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat

The Ave Regina (and the O My Jesus as well) is a part I've never encountered, even in Catholic writings.

Beyond that, it's always been my understanding that the repetivitve-prayer part of the Rosary is to keep what C.S. Lewis called 'the voluble self' in prayer while the conscious focus is on the Mysteries. Focusing on repetitive prayer is contrary to the purpose of the Rosary.
 
Upvote 0

jckstraw72

Doin' that whole Orthodox thing
Dec 9, 2005
10,160
1,145
41
South Canaan, PA
Visit site
✟79,442.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Republican
ive always heard that vain repetition is a poor translation, that its more like vain babbling. and there is no difference between praise and prayer -- they are both communication with God -- that is an arbitrary line to draw just so you can attack the Rosary. The Psalms are very repetitive, and the Psalms have been the prayerbook of Judaism and Christianity for millenia -- i suppose thats a loveless formula, but looking at the fruits of those who have memorized and ceaselessly prayed the Psalms and other practices like the Jesus Prayer or the Rosary, ill side with them. Such practices produce Saints. You see no such thing in Evangelicalism.
 
Reactions: Catherineanne
Upvote 0

CaliforniaJosiah

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2005
17,496
1,568
✟229,195.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican


I've heard all the Catholic "responses" to the repetition issue. I "see" its point. And there's some validity. As I noted, it's a PERSONAL issue - it keeps it from being a blessing to ME. And it's FAR from limited to the Rosary (again, I have the SAME "issue" with some Contemporary Protestant songs, for example).

My "issue" is with the view of Mary in it as I highlighted in embolden, red font. That deleted, I'm more than fine with it.


BTW, way back when I was in my homeschool group for High School, I did that through a large Baptist school. Of those in my HS group there, all homeschoolers, probably 90% were of a fundamentalist, pentecostal or evangelical bent. The two leaders of our group were both Baptists (one a minsiter). Anyway, everyone knew I was pretty active in the RCC and increasingly labeling myself as "Catholic" and so I started to get some questions and stuff. ONE of them was about the Rosary. I mentioned I had one and had used it - which caused a bit of a silence in the room. Anyway, I asked if they wanted me to bring it and show them how it works, and the BAPTIST MINISTER said that sounded like a good idea. So, I did. Now, unlike my new community - Lutherans, they were unfamiliar with the Creed and things, but still, the response was mostly, "Wow - that's like from the Bible!" Yes, their "issue" was entirely the same as mine: the stuff about Mary. As I shared with them, all taht was actually added after the RCC kicked Luther out and Lutherans, Anglicans and others continued it in the pre-Trent form for some time. They were totally okay with that.




.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.