• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

  • The rule regarding AI content has been updated. The rule now rules as follows:

    Be sure to credit AI when copying and pasting AI sources. Link to the site of the AI search, just like linking to an article.

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
What knowledge has been ascertained as a result of wholly religious methodology?

This excludes science motivated by religion (e.g., a scientist who discovers a cure for HIV/AIDS via wholly natural, scientific methods, but does so out of Christian charity), and such knowledge has to be something we actually know within all reasonable doubt (e.g., the existence of atoms), not religious notions yet to be verified (e.g., reincarnation, angels, hell) or falsely predicted (e.g., claims akin to those found in horoscopes).
 

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
In other words have there been any scientific discoveries which did not involve using actual science?

Gee, I wonder ...

Also, what exactly is "religious methodology"?
What indeed Information is 'scientific' if we know of it through science (e.g., evolution). However, that does not preclude the knowledge coming from other sources - hypnotic regression, divine revelation, psychic divination, etc. The information gleaned from these sources might also be verifiable with science, making them scientifically and religiously acquired.

For example, suppose God revealed unto a preacher (who had no prior knowledge of biology or medicine) a 100% guaranteed, side-effect free cure for cancer. This knowledge is not scientific knowledge, as it wasn't given by scientific means. However, that doesn't mean science can't take the claim and verify it, making it scientific knowledge. [EDIT: to clarify, such knowledge would be both religious and scientific, as it's religious in origin and scientific in verification.]

Suppose God revealed this knowledge to the preacher after he prayed for it. That could well constitute a religious method for acquiring method, and indeed it's been touted as one since time immemorial. Similar information could well be attained by the many varieties of occult divination (tarot cards, entrails, bones, palms, tea leaves, etc), or through unprompted divine revelation (as is supposed to have happened in the book of Revelations, the Qu'ran, etc).

Given the many ways that people have claimed to have acquired knowledge via religious (or otherwise supernatural or paranormal) means, have any such claims been subsequently verified by science?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,435
52,722
Guam
✟5,182,747.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Come again?
Unless I misunderstand your OP, I offer the Hittites as an example of an empire that children learned about in Sunday School, LONG before archaeologists discovered them.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,435
52,722
Guam
✟5,182,747.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Thus science would take the credit for "discovering" the universe is expanded, even though it was taught in churches LONG before Hubble ever lived?
 
Upvote 0

Notedstrangeperson

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2008
3,430
110
37
✟27,024.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
In Relationship
So you're asking whether any scientific discoveries have been made through divine revelation?

Hmm ... none that I can think of off the top of my head. Most divine revelations mentioned in the Bible have more to do with future events (prophecies) raher than anything to do with science.
 
Upvote 0

Notedstrangeperson

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2008
3,430
110
37
✟27,024.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
In Relationship
AV1611VET said:
Unless I misunderstand your OP, I offer the Hittites as an example of an empire that children learned about in Sunday School, LONG before archaeologists discovered them.
That would probably have more to do with history rather than science.
 
Upvote 0
Oct 26, 2010
737
9
✟30,927.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private

There are no truths about the universe which have been a product of wholly religious methodology. None. It's one of the great failures of religion. Has religion ever cured a single disease? Developed new techniques for farming to keep men from starvation? No.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,435
52,722
Guam
✟5,182,747.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
There are no truths about the universe which have been a product of wholly religious methodology. None.
God (or "religion," as you guys would probably refer Him) created the hardware that is this universe.

If I read the OP right, it is akin to asking if Black & Decker ever built a single thing.
 
Upvote 0

Notedstrangeperson

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2008
3,430
110
37
✟27,024.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
In Relationship
Religion - particularly Christianity and Islam - helped develop the scientific method. So by extension it has helped eliminate disease and improved farming techniques.

(Also, I have no idea why so many "Buddhists" on CF are critical of religion. Buddhism is a religion.)
 
Upvote 0
Oct 26, 2010
737
9
✟30,927.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private
Religion - particularly Christianity and Islam - helped develop the scientific method. So by extension it has helped eliminate disease and improved farming techniques.
Really? What evidence do you have of this? And that's not what the OP asked. He asked about knowledge generated by religion techniques: revelation, reading entrails, etc.

(Also, I have no idea why so many "Buddhists" on CF are critical of religion. Buddhism is a religion.)
You speak from a position of ignorance. Buddhism in it's stricter forms is certainly NOT a religion as the Western world understands it.
 
Upvote 0

Notedstrangeperson

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2008
3,430
110
37
✟27,024.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
In Relationship
Rilke's Granddaughter said:
Really? What evidence do you have of this? And that's not what the OP asked. He asked about knowledge generated by religion techniques: revelation, reading entrails, etc.
I've already answered Wiccan_Child's question.

Several christians and many muslims helped develop the scientific method. These include: Ibn-al-Haytham, Robert Grosseteste, Francis Bacon, Roger Bacon and William of Ockham.

Rilke's Granddaughter said:
You speak from a position of ignorance. Buddhism in it's stricter forms is certainly NOT a religion as the Western world understands it.
The Western world is not the ultimate authority on what counts as a religion - but even by Western definitions Buddhism counts as a religion because it contains supernatural beliefs, including belief in an afterlife. Stricter forms of Buddhism are more similar to a religion than more modern, liberal forms.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,435
52,722
Guam
✟5,182,747.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0
Oct 26, 2010
737
9
✟30,927.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private
I've already answered Wiccan_Child's question.

Several christians and many muslims helped develop the scientific method. These include: Ibn-al-Haytham, Robert Grosseteste, Francis Bacon, Roger Bacon and William of Ockham.
Not relevant to the OP.



False. I'm the Buddhist, I know. No belief in an afterlife, no supernatural beliefs.
 
Upvote 0

Redac

Regular Member
Jul 16, 2007
4,342
945
California
✟182,909.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Not relevant to the OP.




False. I'm the Buddhist, I know. No belief in an afterlife, no supernatural beliefs.

Are you claiming no school of Buddhism has those thing? Or just that whatever school you may subscribe to does not?
 
Upvote 0