• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

The radio

Status
Not open for further replies.

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
30,064
17,861
Here
✟1,584,380.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Should the government/FCC have the right to tell radio stations what they can and can't play?

I've always been of the opinion that if you don't like what they play...don't listen to that station...any thoughts from the opposing side on this one?
 

Supernaut

What did they aim for when they missed your heart?
Jun 12, 2009
3,460
282
Sacramento, CA
✟27,439.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Should the government/FCC have the right to tell radio stations what they can and can't play?

I've always been of the opinion that if you don't like what they play...don't listen to that station...any thoughts from the opposing side on this one?


I think that the FCC should regulate innapropriate language on the radio. But, those words can always be bleeped out though so I do not support their total banning of songs/music type as a whole.

I personally don't care much for Rap/Hip-Hop/R&B. I also don't care much for Jazz.....doesn't mean any of those musical styles should be banned, I just don't listen to those stations.:thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

white dove

(she's a) maniac
Jan 23, 2004
24,118
2,234
Out there, livin'
✟64,357.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Private
Should the government/FCC have the right to tell radio stations what they can and can't play?

No.

miniverchivi said:
I've always been of the opinion that if you don't like what they play...don't listen to that station...

Indeed.
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
30,064
17,861
Here
✟1,584,380.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I think that the FCC should regulate innapropriate language on the radio. But, those words can always be bleeped out though so I do not support their total banning of songs/music type as a whole.

I personally don't care much for Rap/Hip-Hop/R&B. I also don't care much for Jazz.....doesn't mean any of those musical styles should be banned, I just don't listen to those stations.:thumbsup:

I've always had the Zappa mindset that words are just that...words.

Why would someone be offended by a collection of letters that form a sound. :)

If you let one group start labeling words as "bad" or "not suitable for radio", where does it end? As soon as you give one group their say on what others should hear on the radio, it's only a matter of time before everything is banned.
 
Upvote 0

Joachim

The flag is a protest for state flags
Jan 14, 2009
1,931
119
Bob Riley is my governor
✟25,203.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
The thing about this one is that there are only so many radio frequencies available on the public airwaves and those licenses have to be issued. It is a privilege to have one of those licenses so yes, I do believe that FM radio can and should be regulated by the FCC

Sat radio like XM is a different thing entirely. That shouldn't be subject to any content regulation at all because they aren't using anything that is "public"
 
Upvote 0

Bro_Sam

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2006
5,764
538
✟8,312.00
Faith
Calvinist
Should the government/FCC have the right to tell radio stations what they can and can't play?

No.

I've always been of the opinion that if you don't like what they play...don't listen to that station...any thoughts from the opposing side on this one?

Agreed. If you don't like the music a station plays, find a station that plays music you like. Better yet, it's very easy to start an online station. Start your own.

If you don't like the political views of a talk station, then start your own.
 
Upvote 0

LittleNipper

Contributor
Mar 9, 2005
9,011
174
MOUNT HOLLY, NEW JERSEY
✟10,660.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Should the government/FCC have the right to tell radio stations what they can and can't play?

I've always been of the opinion that if you don't like what they play...don't listen to that station...any thoughts from the opposing side on this one?


Well, I agree with you, but that should even more so apply to education --- don't you think? Education should not be under the control and manipulation of the government. It should be the ward of families, communities, and private contributors.
 
Upvote 0

peadar1987

Well-Known Member
Mar 22, 2009
1,009
57
I'm a Dub, but I live in Scotland now
✟1,446.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Well, I agree with you, but that should even more so apply to education --- don't you think? Education should not be under the control and manipulation of the government. It should be the ward of families, communities, and private contributors.

I would completely disagree with that! It should be the responsibility of the government to ensure that everyone gets an equal standard of education, free of charge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThatRobGuy
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Well, I agree with you, but that should even more so apply to education --- don't you think? Education should not be under the control and manipulation of the government. It should be the ward of families, communities, and private contributors.
They're different things: radio is, at the end of the day, an expression of free speech. The state has a responsibility to ensure that everyone has a decent and free education, and as such public schooling is as essential as free speech.

I don't have much faith in home schooling. I'd rather be taught by people who have an accredited education.
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
30,064
17,861
Here
✟1,584,380.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Well, I agree with you, but that should even more so apply to education --- don't you think? Education should not be under the control and manipulation of the government. It should be the ward of families, communities, and private contributors.

Um, no. I'm comfortable with their being a standard of education. We saw what happened in Utah when they allowed that cult to dictate their own standards of what they teach children. They had men in their 50's marrying (and doing other inappropriate things) 11 year old girls. And the kids were being taught that this was normal by their "ordained educators" as they referred to themselves.

You can turn off a radio, schooling is required (or is supposed to be) until age 18.
 
Upvote 0

Supernaut

What did they aim for when they missed your heart?
Jun 12, 2009
3,460
282
Sacramento, CA
✟27,439.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Why would someone be offended by a collection of letters that form a sound. :)
Well....if the meaning of those words has been predetermined and represent something society deems distasteful, then folks will get all bent outta shape over hearing them.

If you let one group start labeling words as "bad" or "not suitable for radio", where does it end? As soon as you give one group their say on what others should hear on the radio, it's only a matter of time before everything is banned.

I understand your point albeit an exaggeration. Since the 60's though, the FCC has become increasingly lax on "vulagrity". It should only be a matter of time until most everything can be heard. I personally don't have an issue with words being used with the exception of derogatory terms like the "N" word.
 
Upvote 0

DeathMagus

Stater of the Obvious
Jul 17, 2007
3,790
244
Right behind you.
✟35,194.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Others
The thing about this one is that there are only so many radio frequencies available on the public airwaves and those licenses have to be issued. It is a privilege to have one of those licenses so yes, I do believe that FM radio can and should be regulated by the FCC

Sat radio like XM is a different thing entirely. That shouldn't be subject to any content regulation at all because they aren't using anything that is "public"

What is strange, however, is that satellite radio uses radio bandwidth just like terrestrial radio, so I'm not sure why one is considered "public" and the other "private."

Regarding the OP, I am not convinced that there is enough of a disparity of available bands (especially with the switch to digital, which drastically decreases bandwidth consumption) to merit government regulation of content.
 
Upvote 0

MoonLancer

The Moon is a reflection of the MorningStar
Aug 10, 2007
5,765
166
✟37,024.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Well....if the meaning of those words has been predetermined and represent something society deems distasteful, then folks will get all bent outta shape over hearing them.
i can say sex-ing but i cant say ****-ing?

I can say ejaculat-ing but i cant say ****-ing?

I understand your point albeit an exaggeration. Since the 60's though, the FCC has become increasingly lax on "vulagrity". It should only be a matter of time until most everything can be heard. I personally don't have an issue with words being used with the exception of derogatory terms like the "N" word.
That is absurd. I used to be able to watch pg and pg 13 movies on tv without censorship. This cannot be done in today age. What has happened is creative minds have found ways to express the same concepts with creative words that the fcc has not yet censured.
 
Upvote 0

lawtonfogle

My solace my terror, my terror my solace.
Apr 20, 2005
11,586
350
36
✟13,892.00
Faith
Christian
Should the government/FCC have the right to tell radio stations what they can and can't play?

I've always been of the opinion that if you don't like what they play...don't listen to that station...any thoughts from the opposing side on this one?

Remember that the true test of free speech is when you disagree with what is being said... so lets find something we all disagree with...


Lets say there was a radio stations which kept updates of the best places to view little children for less than clean reasons... would you support the government shutting it down (and why)?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.