RC_NewProtestants
Senior Veteran
- May 2, 2006
- 2,766
- 63
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
No traditionals are not intrinsic to our meaning. We were a church that started by going against traditions. Clearly our church founders were able to build upon the Christian foundation yet they were not bound by those traditions as foundations. There is always something to build on but that is only a starting point not the end point. For many traditionals it is the end point thus they reject progressive ideas simply because they are not their traditional ideas.I see your point, but traditionals are intrinsic to our meaning. They are resisting progressives for a reason. There is a foundation to protect, and I don't mean just the 28. That's a minor part of our foundation. Without our foundation, there's nothing to build on. How many times do progressives get all charismatic about changing the church and then take off. Without traditionals, any organization is in trouble. Without progressives, any organization will eventually die. This could be a good marriage! If we get divorced, we'll just want to get remarried!
People can have a foundation and still examine the ideas that make up the foundation and if they don't work they should be removed rather then entrenched. Just as with any other denominational split if there ever is a split neither side will want to remarry.
Upvote
0