Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Collapsing the wave function of the "multiverse" in the best possible way, for those who love him?
None of those are sufficient evidence of an all-powerful, all-knowing & all-loving god. You'll have to do better than that.
Dear talquin. God is all-powerful and God loves us, God wants our love freely given, and no forcing, whatsoever.
..............Christians often claim that their God can do anything. They also often claim that their God loves everyone. If such a God does exist, it would want to prevent evil and would also be capable of preventing evil.
We can quibble over what 'evil' actually means, but we all can agree that things like the genocide, the holocaust, mass suffering, rape of children, destructive earthquakes & typhoons and murder do occur. The question is why doesn't an all-powerful and all-loving God stop these things from happening?
If God is all-loving, then he would want to prevent these things.
If God is all-powerful, then he would be capable of preventing these things.
But since these things do occur, it means a god which is all-loving and all-powerful can't exist. It doesn't mean that no god exists, but it does mean we have to rethink our idea of what God is.
A frequent Christian response to this is that God needs to allow these things to accomplish some kind of greater good. However, if he is all-powerful, he can accomplish any greater good without any kinds of the aforementioned items. In other words, if one can bring about goodness without tragedy, it is better than bringing about goodness with tragedy.
There are other Christian responses, which I'll be happy to address.
[In other words, if one can bring about goodness without tragedy, it is better than bringing about goodness with tragedy.
QUOTE] How would you know that? Is suffering not a consquence of life and is it not better to have been born than to have never been born?
So there is no punishment for failing to reciprocate his love?
Well if you papa loves you he will want what is best for you, and that includes respect for him and his guidance. So its paradoxical, self interest (allegedly) lies in the love of God, because that is best for us. Afetr all narcissism is a fault, and trusting men, well a fallible excusrsion. Today, then follow or believe in the necessary good, maybe (G*d) will help you??? Even if Gods a myth, well the logic is ok all the same.
None of those are sufficient evidence of an all-powerful, all-knowing & all-loving god. You'll have to do better than that.
That would depend on where you spend eternity.s it not better to have been born than to have never been born?
Christians often claim that their God can do anything. They also often claim that their God loves everyone. If such a God does exist, it would want to prevent evil and would also be capable of preventing evil.
We can quibble over what 'evil' actually means, but we all can agree that things like the genocide, the holocaust, mass suffering, rape of children, destructive earthquakes & typhoons and murder do occur. The question is why doesn't an all-powerful and all-loving God stop these things from happening?
If God is all-loving, then he would want to prevent these things.
If God is all-powerful, then he would be capable of preventing these things.
But since these things do occur, it means a god which is all-loving and all-powerful can't exist. It doesn't mean that no god exists, but it does mean we have to rethink our idea of what God is.
A frequent Christian response to this is that God needs to allow these things to accomplish some kind of greater good. However, if he is all-powerful, he can accomplish any greater good without any kinds of the aforementioned items. In other words, if one can bring about goodness without tragedy, it is better than bringing about goodness with tragedy.
There are other Christian responses, which I'll be happy to address.
Upon asking for specifics, Christians usually admit that God is capable of doing things like re-routing a typhoon, stopping a rapist from raping a child, preventing an earthquake from occurring, keeping a murderer from going on a murder spree.It depends on your definition of "all-powerful". God is benevolent, for the world to exist in the state we see it means it must be that way as a step towards God's ultimate plan. If God could have made it better then he would have. The fact it isnt better means God is constrained in what he can do.
None of what you've said helps suggest that there is objective morality.Rational attraction to being. For example safeguarding ones welfare, is as a genral rule ethical, and uses reason and results in the furtherance of a life which we can find attractive.
So god is a priori "rational attraction to being" (infallibly good, the better opition which ought to exist beyond all measure, grovel grovel) and we are finite, mortal creatures (oops, did I say that).
Interesting that when you're backed into a corner, you can only resort to ad hominem. This is an obvious sign that you know I've beaten you badly in this debate/discussion. I would like to think it would be less painful for you to admit defeat than to concede defeat by resorting to ad hominem.Ignorant. There is no better word for you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?