• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

The phrase, "In Christ"

D

dan p

Guest
The more I think about this often seen phrase, I am beginning to grow in my conviction that this is a stamp of covenantal language.

Would this be correct?

Hi mannysee , Robert C Brock has written a booklet on this subject called " IN CHRIST " and he cataloged all references where it is written in the bible , and Paul seem to be the only one to use that Phrase " IN CHRIST " and Paul is a Dispensationalist , Eph 3:2 .
 
Upvote 0

Look Up

"What is unseen is eternal"
Jul 16, 2010
928
175
✟16,230.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
I'm not sure what you mean. I suppose the "in Christ," "in Him," "in God" language seems a bit obscure to most of us thinking in Euclidean geometry terms, or perhaps more so to those of us whose culture accents individualism and egalitarianism as opposed to collectivist and authoritarian aspects of humanity. Even so, human analogies in the end may not be expected to capture entirely the significance of the relationship between the those in Christ and Christ.

There does seem to be an aspect that is at least analogous to a spacial concept. Those in Christ are located in Christ in some way(s). The relationship also seems to imply a representative headship of Christ over and on behalf of those in Him. This latter in particular seems almost tangibly consistent with ideas of covenant, although the terms for "in Christ" do not always necessarily and overtly draw the connection.
 
Upvote 0
D

dan p

Guest
I'm not sure what you mean. I suppose the "in Christ," "in Him," "in God" language seems a bit obscure to most of us thinking in Euclidean geometry terms, or perhaps more so to those of us whose culture accents individualism and egalitarianism as opposed to collectivist and authoritarian aspects of humanity. Even so, human analogies in the end may not be expected to capture entirely the significance of the relationship between the those in Christ and Christ.

There does seem to be an aspect that is at least analogous to a spacial concept. Those in Christ are located in Christ in some way(s). The relationship also seems to imply a representative headship of Christ over and on behalf of those in Him. This latter in particular seems almost tangibly consistent with ideas of covenant, although the terms for "in Christ" do not always necessarily and overtly draw the connection.

Hi , and you should be able to Google Robert C Brock and read his booklet of " IN CHRIST " and see for yourself , dan p
 
Upvote 0

Edouard

Regular Member
Mar 15, 2003
234
6
50
Auburn Hills, MI
Visit site
✟22,902.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Republican
Anyone speak plain english here, or do we make the word of God so complicated that it confuses more people.

"In Christ"
In the name of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Speaks of us doing acts or speaking as if Christ is in us. The holy spirit.

However, read Jude. Even the demons and Satan himself have been in the presence of both Jesus and God. One must be a christian and have the relationship with God, unlike those who say I know Him and Christ says I do not know you.

Edouard.
 
Upvote 0

Dispy

Veteran
Jan 16, 2004
2,551
32
94
South Dakota
✟4,680.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
dan p said:
Paul is a Dispensationalist , Eph 3:2 .[/QUOTE



In Ephesians 2 alone, Paul speaks of 3 dispensations. IMHO that does make him a dispensationalists.

In Eph. 2:11, 12, he speaks of TIMES PAST, ie.e how things were in the past.

In vs. 13 he speaks of BUT NOW, as they are today.

In vs. 7 he speaks of THE AGES TO COME. When God brings everything to fruition.

If one does not believe that circumcision, animal sacrifices, and other Jewish requirements, are for today, then that one is also a dispensationalists.
 
Upvote 0

Dispy

Veteran
Jan 16, 2004
2,551
32
94
South Dakota
✟4,680.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
"For we are members of His body, of His flesh, and of His bones" (Eph. 5:30).

As one who has placed his FAITH alone in the Cross work (death, burial, and resurrection - 1 Cor. 15:1-4) for my salvation, I am "in Christ". "...Sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise...until the redemption of the purcchased possession, unto the praise of His glory" (Eph. 1:13, 14), and baptized by the Spirit into the Body of Christ (1 Cor. 12:13), no water or proxy involved.
 
Upvote 0

Osage Bluestem

Galatians 5:1
Dec 27, 2010
2,488
253
Texas
Visit site
✟26,711.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The more I think about this often seen phrase, I am beginning to grow in my conviction that this is a stamp of covenantal language.

Would this be correct?

I don't think so. Being in Christ just means you are saved.
 
Upvote 0

LovedofHim

Well-Known Member
Jan 6, 2011
1,488
17
Up here, over there, beyond that
✟1,731.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The more I think about this often seen phrase, I am beginning to grow in my conviction that this is a stamp of covenantal language.

Would this be correct?

Those who are "in Christ" are believers, saved by the blood of Christ.

Was Abraham "in Christ"? Abraham had a covenant with God but Christ wasn't a part of that covenant.

Was Paul "in Christ"? Yes.
 
Upvote 0

franky67

Senior Veteran
Jul 22, 2005
4,157
320
100
✟36,351.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Those who are "in Christ" are believers, saved by the blood of Christ.

Was Abraham "in Christ"? Abraham had a covenant with God but Christ wasn't a part of that covenant.

Was Paul "in Christ"? Yes.

Oh yes He was, Galatians 3:16

"Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and his seed, he does not say and to seeds, as referring to many, but rather to one, and to your seed, that is Christ."

That's why the bible says we are joint heirs with Christ.
 
  • Like
Reactions: heymikey80
Upvote 0

heymikey80

Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur
Dec 18, 2005
14,496
921
✟49,309.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
In Ephesians 2 alone, Paul speaks of 3 dispensations. IMHO that does make him a dispensationalists.
The existence of dispensations of God's grace is accepted by covenantalists. The question is which rules ... rule -- wiping out rules and rebuilding them with each dispensation, or covenants that successively fulfill stipulations of other covenants -- or remain in force.
In Eph. 2:11, 12, he speaks of TIMES PAST, ie.e how things were in the past.

In vs. 13 he speaks of BUT NOW, as they are today.

In vs. 7 he speaks of THE AGES TO COME. When God brings everything to fruition.
These are completely different from the normal dispensations people talk about.

Plus, they're about the Gentiles' personal experiences in their own lives.
If one does not believe that circumcision, animal sacrifices, and other Jewish requirements, are for today, then that one is also a dispensationalists.
So there's no opposition left in dispensationalism? Covenantalists don't believe that the requirements are for today, that they've been fulfilled by the Greater Elements to which they originally pointed and promised, and they were then fulfilled by,
 
Upvote 0
S

swordmaster

Guest
The more I think about this often seen phrase, I am beginning to grow in my conviction that this is a stamp of covenantal language.

Would this be correct?

You are correct. If you look at the passages speaking on the Kingdom of God, baptism, regeneration, "in Christ" and being a disciple of Christ, you will find that they are all interrelated.

We cannot enter the Kingdom of God unless we are first "born of water (baptism) and the Spirit (regeneration).

When we are regenerated, we are given all we need to enter into the presence of God that we can never have on our own (if you study the Tent of Meeting and all the furniture, as well as the duties of the priests, you will find shadows of Christ and what He gives to us from the cross...tearing the veil down in two).

Christ came to inaugurate the New Covenant in His blood, doing away with the first covenant to establish the second. When we are baptized, we enter into the covenant (we are baptized into Christ). Since we are in the covenant, becoming the covenant people of God, we are in the Kingdom of God (those who obey God make up the Kingdom here on earth). When we enter into the covenant relationship with God, we inherit the promises, the most important of which is eternal life. This Divine Relationship is spoken of in the term "in Christ."

Just as circumcision was the "sign" of one in participation in the old covenant, so baptism is the "sign" of one participating in the new covenant.

Blessings!
 
Upvote 0
S

swordmaster

Guest
I don't think so. Being in Christ just means you are saved.


Actually, if you look into the difference between being "saved" and having eternal life "in Christ," we don't come to that conclusion. We are not in Christ because we are "saved," we are "saved" (have eternal life) because we are in Christ...in the covenant.
 
Upvote 0
S

swordmaster

Guest
Those who are "in Christ" are believers, saved by the blood of Christ.

Was Abraham "in Christ"? Abraham had a covenant with God but Christ wasn't a part of that covenant.

Was Paul "in Christ"? Yes.


Ah, yes, but we are not talking about the old covenant, we are talking about the new covenant, inaugurated in the blood of Christ.
 
Upvote 0

Optimax

Senior Veteran
May 7, 2006
17,659
448
New Mexico
✟56,659.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Read the verses.

Verses like the following tell us who we are or what we have been given or made in Christ.

Rom 8:1-2
8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.
KJV

1 Cor 1:30

30 But of him are ye in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption:
KJV
 
Upvote 0

ReformedPharisee

Messenger of the New Covenant
Apr 5, 2012
116
2
✟257.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The more I think about this often seen phrase, I am beginning to grow in my conviction that this is a stamp of covenantal language.

Would this be correct?


Mannysee, I have not read the other replies, so please forgive if this is redundant...but yes, you are correct. When we see Isaiah 42.6 where God tells us that He is giving us the Messiah as the Covenant, we see that when one is in Christ, one is in Covenant with God. Not to mention that Christ Himself told us that His blood was the blood of the New Covenant.

Isaiah 42:6
"I am the LORD; I have called you in righteousness; I will take you by the hand and keep you; I will give you as a covenant for the people, a light for the nations,"

This passages is from a larger Messianic Prophecy, and we have God speaking here, telling us that He is sending the Messiah to be a Covenant for us. Then we see...

Luke 22:20
Likewise He also took the cup after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is shed for you.”

Matthew 26:27-28
Then He took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, “Drink of it, all of you, for this is My blood of the New Covenant, which is shed for many, for the forgiveness of sins.”

The New Covenant is in the Blood of Christ, and Christ is the embodiment of the New Covenant, just as He is the Way, the Truth, and the Life, and just as He is the Life and the Resurrection.

"In Christ" is Covenant language, just as "walking in the Spirit" is...the Biblical meaning, not the traditional meaning that the church has assigned it to mean.

If we are in Christ, we are in that Covenant Relationship with God.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0