Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
The Origins of Young Earth Creationism
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trophy33" data-source="post: 76492958" data-attributes="member: 414763"><p>I do not know many details form his life, just his Meditations. But my favorite author of the rationalism era would be Leibniz.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I will let science to do what it can do, there is no disagreement between us.</p><p></p><p>I do not claim that God can be tested/proved in some experiment, I cannot imagine what it would be.</p><p>Indeed God, mind and generally anything behind the physical universe cannot be scientifically verified. At least not with our current knowledge and with our current tools (which are physical). Usage of physical tools to detect spiritual things is obviously impossible.</p><p></p><p>But the conclusion cannot be "therefore there is nothing more". It worked for atheism during the Soviet Union era, but in our current science we know that there is much more behind the matter. The String Theory being the most prominent theory in physics, now. With many, many more that are totally "crazy" for a common sense and are not so known, but serious scientists debate them like the emergent universe, simulation hypothesis, many worlds interpretation of QM, hollographic universe, universe without a beginning etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trophy33, post: 76492958, member: 414763"] I do not know many details form his life, just his Meditations. But my favorite author of the rationalism era would be Leibniz. I will let science to do what it can do, there is no disagreement between us. I do not claim that God can be tested/proved in some experiment, I cannot imagine what it would be. Indeed God, mind and generally anything behind the physical universe cannot be scientifically verified. At least not with our current knowledge and with our current tools (which are physical). Usage of physical tools to detect spiritual things is obviously impossible. But the conclusion cannot be "therefore there is nothing more". It worked for atheism during the Soviet Union era, but in our current science we know that there is much more behind the matter. The String Theory being the most prominent theory in physics, now. With many, many more that are totally "crazy" for a common sense and are not so known, but serious scientists debate them like the emergent universe, simulation hypothesis, many worlds interpretation of QM, hollographic universe, universe without a beginning etc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
The Origins of Young Earth Creationism
Top
Bottom