Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
The Origins of Young Earth Creationism
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AV1611VET" data-source="post: 76491175" data-attributes="member: 152669"><p>Au contraire.</p><p></p><p>Magic aside, science indeed made an attempt to apply its myopic scientific method to the supernatural.</p><p></p><p>And failed miserably -- very miserably.</p><p></p><p>One of the better-known failures is the Apollo 14 ESP test.</p><p></p><p>And scientists today even tested the effects of prayer-vs-placebo.</p><p></p><p>Everything from astral projection to Kirlian photography has science's myopic fingerprints all over it.</p><p></p><p>And what do they usually conclude?</p><p></p><p>"Duuuuh ... I don't know, Tennessee."</p><p></p><p>The one thing they did test though, that I think was very informative, was the DNA in the wafers of the Eucharist.</p><p></p><p>One of the few times I agree with their conclusions regarding the supernatural.</p><p></p><p>When will scientists ever learn that testing the supernatural is a waste of time, energy, resources, <s>intelligence</s>, and money?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AV1611VET, post: 76491175, member: 152669"] Au contraire. Magic aside, science indeed made an attempt to apply its myopic scientific method to the supernatural. And failed miserably -- very miserably. One of the better-known failures is the Apollo 14 ESP test. And scientists today even tested the effects of prayer-vs-placebo. Everything from astral projection to Kirlian photography has science's myopic fingerprints all over it. And what do they usually conclude? "Duuuuh ... I don't know, Tennessee." The one thing they did test though, that I think was very informative, was the DNA in the wafers of the Eucharist. One of the few times I agree with their conclusions regarding the supernatural. When will scientists ever learn that testing the supernatural is a waste of time, energy, resources, [S]intelligence[/S], and money? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
The Origins of Young Earth Creationism
Top
Bottom