Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So now (if I may suppose) you will posit an entire additional 'non-physical' universe to make your God hypothesis work.I stated that everything in this physical universe needs a cause...
Nope, just the essential being of GodSo now (if I may suppose) you will posit an entire additional 'non-physical' universe to make your God hypothesis work.
Isn't that basically what you are doing with the quantum field theory?So now (if I may suppose) you will posit an entire additional 'non-physical' universe to make your God hypothesis work.
No. There is evidence of that. What you have is a logical fallacy dolled up as meaningful.Isn't that basically what you are doing with the quantum field theory?
That sounds more like a Simulation Hypothesis than Classical Theism. Nevertheless, I find a Simulation Hypothesis more probable than some kind of naturally spawning finely tuned universe.So now (if I may suppose) you will posit an entire additional 'non-physical' universe to make your God hypothesis work.
Good point!Genesis 1:1 does not say:
"In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth."
I cringe when someone says that.
Genesis 1:1 does say:
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."
There's a reason "heaven" is singular in Genesis 1, and plural in Genesis 2.
Nope, QFT is an attempt to explain the underlying reality of the observable evidence.No. There is evidence of that. What you have is a logical fallacy dolled up as meaningful.
except it doesnt'tGood point!
Which has entirely nothing g to do with what you posted.QFT is an attempt to explain the underlying reality of the observable evidence.
I imagine abortion will be along at some point. Or hating Jesus and persecution of Christians (True Christians- the ones who accept evolution, plate tectonics, cosmology etc).Is there anything going on here besides trying to turn rejection of a literal Genesis into an attack on the existence of God?
explain yourself, this thread is about the origin of the universeWhich has entirely nothing g to do with what you posted.
'evolution, plate tectonics, cosmology' is part of orthodoxy??I imagine abortion will be along at some point. Or hating Jesus and persecution of Christians (True Christians- the ones who accept evolution, plate tectonics, cosmology etc).
Not sure what the point is you're trying to make?Is there anything going on here besides trying to turn rejection of a literal Genesis into an attack on the existence of God?
Lemaître's theory of the primeval atom was published in 1927, nearly 100 years ago. Gamow's Big Bang theory was published in 1948, 76 years ago, and, with some modifications is still regarded as valid today. On the other hand, there have been dozens of religious predictions of the end of the world since 1927, all of which have had to be changed when the predicted date passed without any supernatural intervention.The current cosmological model is theory and ever changing
This is cherry-picking. Why deliberately omit all the list of scientific theories published by 'scientific geniuses' of the past century which have been debunked as of this present point?Lemaître's theory of the primeval atom was published in 1927, nearly 100 years ago. Gamow's Big Bang theory was published in 1948, 76 years ago, and, with some modifications is still regarded as valid today. On the other hand, there have been dozens of religious predictions of the end of the world since 1927, all of which have had to be changed when the predicted date passed without any supernatural intervention.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?