Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If that's how you want to cop out of a response, you're free to do so.If this is intended as a serious response I shall be reporting you for infringement of forum rules.
Excuse me, you are the one who is failing to provide an answer. You have claimed that the Theory of Evolution is based upon many assumptions. I think you may have said, "nothing but assumptions". Yet you refuse to give a single genuine example of any such assumptions. That is neither polite, logical, nor good forum etiquette.If that's how you want to cop out of a response, you're free to do so.
You can join your friends on my ignore list.
God bless you, have a nice day.
ToE is the assumption.Excuse me, you are the one who is failing to provide an answer. You have claimed that the Theory of Evolution is based upon many assumptions.
Any of the four are necessary conditions for evolution to take place.Creationists constantly claim that abiogenesis and evolution are and must be linked otherwise evolution is false. In response to that claim I have been asking this question and thus far, the responses have ranged from evasion to crickets.
Here are 4 possible sources for the origin of life on earth. Tell me how any of them effect evolution in any way.
1. Abiogenesis
2. Panspermia
3. Fiat creation by God
4. Something weird like being a science project for hyper-dimensional high schoolers.
So, Creationists, can any of you step up to the plate and answer my question?
Any of the four are necessary conditions for evolution to take place.
Can you prove evolution is true with out this rule/hold?
Is that the only thing holding you back? Just trying to figure out how important this problem really is.
Attempts to make genealogical trees have failed, there are no specific scenarios for organisms developing into a new kind with new organs.
All organisms can do is implement the present data, when it's not too damaged by mutations.
Copying mistakes in amounts of data as found in DNA don't write new coherent data.
Try telling a scientist how you can disprove evolution once and for all, and see if he gives you the time of day.
As far as I can tell, abiogenesis is the best explanation for the origins of life for the atheist. So abiogenesis and atheistic evolution are certainly connected.
Panspermia is just abiogenesis once removed and option 4 creates much more problems that it solves (also it's absurd).
Domino A affects evolution because it started it all. Without A there would be no B, etc.
You don't need to know *how* A came into existence, or *how* it was initially tipped, but for evolution to be true there must have been an A that was tipped. The two are related.
HahahaOh stop with the inane magical Creationist words. There is overwhelming evidence for evolution. That you are unfamiliar with it is your problem.
View attachment 177258
Nothing is ever proven in science. You've been corrected on that previously.
I have no idea what this gibberish means. Can you at least try to answer the question in the OP?
Already answered the question in the OP (on the first page.
Not gibberish at all, lol, just consider the subject...is that the only thing holding you back from proving (or whatever it is you do) that evolution is true? Funny how one can suddenly develop inability to understand the simplest of comments when the need to take a cut at their opponent arises. Relax, no ones out to get you....just trying to get at the facts/truth, nothing more.
A few more quick, but important questions if you will please..
1)Since you are already aware you can't prove evolution true, why even bother with the question in the OP?
2)Loudmouth said evolution could be proven beyond reasonable doubt, can you go that far anyway?
3)or do you disagree with the "proven" part of LM's comment even in the reasonable doubt scenario?
4)If so, am I to take form all this, there is essentially no way to prove evolution true since the very science that appears to be exactly what folks are using to convince us, is not valid proof? Right?
5)Or is there a way of proving evolution true, without proving it? And if so, what is that?
Already answered the question in the OP (on the first page.
Not gibberish at all,
lol, just consider the subject...is that the only thing holding you back from proving (or whatever it is you do) that evolution is true?
Funny how one can suddenly develop inability to understand the simplest of comments...
1)Since you are already aware you can't prove evolution true, why even bother with the question in the OP?
2)Loudmouth said evolution could be proven beyond reasonable doubt, can you go that far anyway
3)or do you disagree with the "proven" part of LM's comment even in the reasonable doubt scenario
4)If so, am I to take form all this, there is essentially no way to prove evolution true since the very science that appears to be exactly what folks are using to convince us, is not valid proof? Right?
5)Or is there a way of proving evolution true, without proving it? And if so, what is that?
Have you ever been vaccinated? Have you ever taken antibiotics? Those are made possible by our understanding of evolution.
If you were actually posting research papers that support your claims, i'd be very interested. Instead you post conspiracy theory nonsense.
The site you posted also had an article about a guy saying that he was an extra terrestrial alien in a past life. I don't think any more needs to be said.
4th on this list is a known fake. And none are transitional. All are fully formed.
Flying reptiles are no more birds than are bats. Toothed birds are not dinosaurs
either. This is the type of bait and switch common to evolution.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?