• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The Ordination of Practicing Homosexuals

Are you for or against the ordination of practicing homosexuals?

  • I am for the ordination of practicing homosexuals.

  • I am against the ordination of practicing homosexuals.

  • I don't know what my position is on this issue.


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

TomUK

What would Costanza do?
Site Supporter
Feb 8, 2004
9,101
397
41
Lancashire, UK
✟84,645.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Conservative
Broadly speaking i am against. However being in a theological college with a number of the openly gay individuals has been challenging - it is clear that God has placed a calling on their life and i'm trying to reconcile that with what the church clearly teaches.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ebia
Upvote 0

Secundulus

Well-Known Member
Mar 24, 2007
10,065
849
✟14,425.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
So you are against anyone but Christ being ordained?
The key word there was willfully. And yes, there are plenty of Christians, perhaps the majority, who are deceiving themselves as to their standing with God.
 
Upvote 0

New_Found_Faith

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2004
5,000
228
✟75,978.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Personally, I don't see homosexuality within the context of a modern, monogamous relationship as being sinful. So I am naturally in favor of letting such a person pursue Church leadership if they feel that they have been called to do so.

Even if I did view it as sinful, I would still support ordination of such a person if they were well qualified. All preists willfully sin. I don't care if the sin is alcoholism, gluttony, or overall rudeness. There is not a perfect one among them. I chose to judge not, and cast no stones.

The individual is more qualified to decide if they are called to the priesthood than I, IMHO.
 
Upvote 0
B

brightmorningstar

Guest
To New Found Faith,
Personally, I don't see homosexuality within the context of a modern, monogamous relationship as being sinful.
Why not? The scriptures indicate faithful unions are man and woman or celibacy, and that same sex relationships are error; there is no scriptural support for that idea and indeed its against scripture.


So I am naturally in favor of letting such a person pursue Church leadership if they feel that they have been called to do so.
If they don’t know the scriptures the question is have they been called in the first place, I suggest not.

Even if I did view it as sinful, I would still support ordination of such a person if they were well qualified.
Again, who decides whether something is sinful, you the person wanting to be ordained or God? Who do you think ordains if someone if called by God? If one is called by God, God ordains them.

I don't care if the sin is alcoholism, gluttony, or overall rudeness. There is not a perfect one among them. I chose to judge not, and cast no stones.
So for you it is alright to promote sin? I think you will find that’s not a hallmark of a Christian, Christians seek repentance when falling short in sin rather than revelling in the sin.

The individual is more qualified to decide if they are called to the priesthood than I, IMHO.
Again, that excludes God.
 
Upvote 0

wayseer

Well-Known Member
Jun 10, 2008
8,226
505
Maryborough, QLD, Australia
✟11,141.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Perhaps it best to remember Archbishop Rowan Williams words ...

The bishops of the Communion have collectively acknowledged that a period of gracious restraint in respect of actions which are contrary to the mind of the Communion is necessary if our bonds of mutual affection are to hold.

... and observe the 'period of gracious restrain' in these matters.
 
Upvote 0

Sitswithamouse

I look Time Lord
Mar 6, 2005
3,871
478
56
Devon, UK
✟28,926.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Greens
Any words that could make it easier for someone to attack or abuse a homosexual person are words of which we must repent. Do not think http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repentancerepentance is always something others are called to, but acknowledge the failings we all share, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinsinful and struggling disciples as we are.

Rowan williams 2004
 
Upvote 0
B

brightmorningstar

Guest
To Sitswithamouse,
Any words that could make it easier for someone to attack or abuse a homosexual person are words of which we must repent. Do not think repentance is always something others are called to, but acknowledge the failings we all share, sinful and struggling disciples as we are.

Rowan williams 2004
That doesnt necessarily work, it depends what words cause it. Anyone who doesnt take any notice of God's word against same sex relations isn't necessarily going to take any notice of God's word to love even one's ememies.
 
Upvote 0

Yardstick

Episcopalian
Oct 12, 2008
580
60
Kansas City, MO
✟16,039.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
To Yardstick,
No, I am against anyone promoting sin. Are you for everyone promoting sin being ordained?

All but Christ are in error. All willfully sin. We don't even have to get into a discussion about the nature of homosexuality to see that your standards for the priesthood are impossible.

Who exactly are you to tell God whom can and cannot be called?
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
All but Christ are in error. All willfully sin. We don't even have to get into a discussion about the nature of homosexuality to see that your standards for the priesthood are impossible.
No, it's actually quite easy to sort out applicants for ordination who "promote" sinning from those who don't advocate sinning.

But this raises another question. Why do advocates of ordaining open, practicing homosexuals discriminate against heterosexuals who may be living with a partner, not married, and professing that it is right with God to do so?

]Who exactly are you to tell God whom can and cannot be called?
It's what God has told us about whom he will call, not the other way around.
 
Upvote 0

AngCath

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2005
4,097
144
41
✟20,088.00
Faith
Anglican
But this raises another question. Why do advocates of ordaining open, practicing homosexuals discriminate against heterosexuals who may be living with a partner, not married, and professing that it is right with God to do so?

because as it stands, homosexuals are not allowed to get married in most places and must simply live together whereas heterosexuals may get married.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.