Crowns&Laurels
Well-Known Member
- Jul 11, 2015
- 2,769
- 751
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
Yes they do! Are you kidding, what do you think started this whole thing to begin with
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Scientists don't just sit around scheming up complex theories and forming cabals to run out anyone who disagrees.
Socrates?
a majority of scientists are likely to be christian.No. Modern day, atheist apologist scientists.
But any scientist that is a Christian is just beat into the conspiracies or else they lose their jobs or worse!a majority of scientists are likely to be christian.
a majority of scientists are likely to be christian.
But any scientist that is a Christian is just beat into the conspiracies or else they lose their jobs or worse!
LolBut any scientist that is a Christian is just beat into the conspiracies or else they lose their jobs or worse!
People who know almost no science and most likely no scientists.
But any scientist that is a Christian is just beat into the conspiracies or else they lose their jobs or worse!
False. It's time that it is realized scientists aren't all saints, and that atheists have to compensate by treating them as such. Time to call that perpetuated bias for what it is.
No one claims they are, rather there is professional competition, nay not mere competition outright jealousy. Scientists are rivals and the rules of the scientific game give them adequate opportunity to discredit their rivals. The great conspiracy theory could not be further from the truth.
No, the Oort cloud is not a different solar system it is a made up zone.So, would you believe that I am actually posting from a different solar system? Why or why not?
Easy as pie. You think the orbital path "implies" something. That is your mistake. Tell us why that orbit implies that to you exactly, and we shall see.So how do you explain the observations of long-period comets? Some of them have orbital semi-major axes of 20,000 AU, and that implies orbital periods of about 3 million years. How can you have these long-period comets entering the inner solar system every few years without there being at least millions of them at distances of about 20,000 AU?
So is that why Dawkins toured the Middle East slandering the religious? Is that why in all public debates, they have a smirk on their face when a gay person or atheist stands up and says something ridiculous? Have you seen these atheist gatherings?
People pretending to be persecuted is not a conspiracy theory. Again, it is common observation, and I think you all use 'conspiracy theory' to simply manipulate others into thinking the painfully obvious isn't obvious.
So a star brightens and dims on a regular basis. That all??!! So what?Mira (omicron Ceti), chi Cygni and delta Cephei vary in brightness because they are pulsating; the star expands and contracts on a more or less regular cycle. The predicted times of maximum are based on the periods of the light variation derived from observations of the stars.
Theoretically indeed. That says little but that you see something and try to make a formula.Also, theoretically, the period is proportional to the inverse square root of the density of the star; the larger and less dense the star, the longer its photometric period.
?? You kidding? So some things go round other things in deep space...so?? That doesn't tell you how big the things are, all that they are made of (only the physical bits we can detect from a prism here on earth), how dar away they are, or WHY they actually go round...etc.Eclipsing binary stars like Algol (beta Persei) vary because the stars occult each other as they orbit round each other; it is the same as the occultations and transits of Jupiter's satellites.
Is this just me or does this sound somewhat circular to anyone else!?The predictions of the times of minima are based on the period derived from observed minima,
What about these? Are you still trying to establish the obvious that things go round other things in space??and also from spectroscopic measurements of the orbital period.
You missed the piggy face.Francisco Ayala, Theodosius Dobzhansky, Kenneth Miller, Francis Collins are all world-class biologists who openly discuss their scientific beliefs, and no one gives them any guff about it.
Probably true in other disciplines as well. You've been fed a load of prune product about that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?