Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Well, I assume that things man sees in the heavens should convey some message. One message they convey is that the heavens declare the wonders and glory of the creator. Another message I often get is that science is clueless about it.Would you care to explain the meaning of any bright comet that has been seen in the past 100 years?
Just to take one example, Comet Ikeya-Seki was nearly as bright as the full moon, and was visible in the daytime.
Sign schmign.
It is an imaginary cloud used to explain comets and stuff. It shows that science grasps at straws to avoid God as creator, and fits all things, even things they made up...into the godless models.Can someone give a summary of why the Oort cloud is so significant to science and why the Oort cloud is so significant to creationism?
Do you spend hours every day looking for messages in wax dripped into pans of water?Well, I assume that things man sees in the heavens should convey some message. One message they convey is that the heavens declare the wonders and glory of the creator. Another message I often get is that science is clueless about it.
I gathered that you simply don't accept the Oort Cloud (nor the scientific consensus), but why would the existence of the Oort Cloud be manifested as a way to avoid God?It is an imaginary cloud used to explain comets and stuff. It shows that science grasps at straws to avoid God as creator, and fits all things, even things they made up...into the godless models.
About the beyond Pluto belt. I googled that they had found 1000 objects. They envision a lot more is there. I don't see how that really matters or relates.This is probably overkill, but I found a presentation by someone from Caltech. Some nice data of an occultation by Saturn, showing how noisy it is.
Then some calculations on Kuiper Belt objects, showing that it's just about on the edge of feasibility. If you watch a star for an entire year, there should be about 100 events from KBOs with durations of a few tenths of a second that might be noticeable out of the noise.
Oort Cloud objects on the other hand seem to be too far and small to see this way, even if a new satellite were designed to look for these kinds of occultations.
No. Nor do I spend all day denying Scripture.Do you spend hours every day looking for messages in wax dripped into pans of water?
Let me guess, a big electric field and some plasma did a hula dance and that made the comets?Fist of all you have to realize not all stars have fully lit photospheres.
http://www.aip.de/en/news/science/starspots
So not every darkening and brightening may be due to a planet.
Then you also have to remember that not only has the fable of comets been falsified - but stars have been observed to directly contradict the claimed lifetime of stars in the HR diagram.
http://electric-cosmos.org/hrdiagr.htm
No. The Oort Cloud and the easter bunny are too far to be seen. But some believe.A sign, eh? The Oort cloud is too far away for humans to see. Why did God create a sign which we can't see? Did he miscalculate?
Science: The unfounded assertion that no God must have done it for no reason and any theory not involving god must be right.Explanation, noun: The unfounded assertion that god must have done it for a reason and any theory not involving god must be wrong.
Thanks for that, the thread needed some humor.It is easier to detect Oort Clouds around other stars by the infrared reflection of the debris.
Why grasp at straws to explain comets? The whole thing is an exercise in cooking up any pathetic explanation that fits with the godless, no creation model. Engaging in that sort of delirious giddy lobotomized reinvention of the created universe is a waste of time and indicative of pre conceived beliefs.I gathered that you simply don't accept the Oort Cloud (nor the scientific consensus), but why would the existence of the Oort Cloud be manifested as a way to avoid God?
I dunno dad. There was already plenty of humour from where I'm sitting.
And not a single trace of water was found in a single sample returned.
Can someone give a summary of why the Oort cloud is so significant to science and why the Oort cloud is so significant to creationism?
Water, not ice! Duh!It's been known for a very long time that comets are largely composed of ice.
Spectroscopy detected water on comets a long time ago. That's not at issue.
Let me guess, a big electric field and some plasma did a hula dance and that made the comets?
The star is 39±1 parsecs away; it has a radius of 1.34±0.05 solar radii and a luminosity of 4.9±0.4 times the Sun's.Well, tell us about mass loss for the star. How far away and big it is?
Of course it contains a debris disc and planets now - that's how planets form - split from a star undergoing high electrical stress per square meter.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?