I saw that excuse just yesterday in a thread posted in the News & Current Events forum.
And a few days ago, a protestant right here in this forum declared that Catholics weren't Christians. So... her statement is moot.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Indeed.
Even a blind man could agree with what you state above.
You agree with Hetta, thus you must be a religious institution.Agreed.
A protestant 'singular' as an individual. Just as someone in your family being a rapist, does not make you a rapist.I saw that excuse just yesterday in a thread posted in the News & Current Events forum.
And a few days ago, a protestant right here in this forum declared that Catholics weren't Christians. So... her statement is moot.
Do you believe wrongly?
I saw that excuse just yesterday in a thread posted in the News & Current Events forum.
And a few days ago, a protestant right here in this forum declared that Catholics weren't Christians. So... her statement is moot.
Not if you follow the discussion.It might help to clarify. Wrongly according to whom?
Is trying to discredit someones belief a primitive defense mechanism? if so, surely that is true for both.Some Christians use the tactic (claiming someone isn't a true Christian). IMO, it is a primitive defense mechanism, certain people are motivated to utilize, to protect their own belief.
Yes, you need two humans to have a disagreement.
The fact is, it is humans who developed the theology, humans have disagreement over.
This is a non sequitur. You took my statement out of context.Do you? And how do you know you're right in your personal theology and beliefs? I know... I know... because scripture says so. Funny how other Christians who are probably deemed not to be Christians use the same exact reason as you do. Round and round we go, where we stop, nobody knows...
'Individuals' - interesting you put that word in quotes. However, the institutions exist before the individuals flock to it. So you don't believe that churches are instituted by God?Those institutions are made up of 'individuals' who align with it. That's reality. I'll refer you back to the vegetables.
Some Christians use the tactic (claiming someone isn't a true Christian). IMO, it is a primitive defense mechanism, certain people are motivated to utilize, to protect their own belief.
This is a non sequitur. You took my statement out of context.
There was a context. You should follow the discussion (especially since she quoted you).Did you state according to whom? I must have missed it.
Is trying to discredit someones belief a primitive defense mechanism? if so, surely that is true for both.
There is a context to the question.No, it's a legitimate question. I'm curious to know your answer.
'Individuals' - interesting you put that word in quotes. However, the institutions exist before the individuals flock to it. So you don't believe that churches are instituted by God?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?