Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
The more education I get, the less decisive I become
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="timewerx" data-source="post: 70415222" data-attributes="member: 314730"><p>I'm an inventor of some sort and upon studying the rules of patenting, I discovered there are certain inventions that can never patented:</p><p></p><p>- Mainly inventions that appear to violate the laws of nature.</p><p></p><p>Such notion actually contradicts quantum level physics in that the laws of nature are routinely violated at the quantum level. It's an obsolete/out-dated ruling! I have an invention based on quantum level phenomena that may appear to violate the laws of nature.</p><p></p><p>What now? So I couldn't patent it. I even presented the concept to a forum staffed by PhD holders from respectable research institutions in USA like MIT and I was swiftly dismissed and banned.</p><p></p><p>I have other plans to get my invention to public attention.</p><p></p><p>My point is that the academia does have some very ugly sides to it. They are not objective all the time, even unfairly biased, very close-minded, corrupt(!), elitists/too proud all of which are counterproductive to the advancement of science and technology.</p><p></p><p>If you have something quite radical, expect to be like Jesus facing the Pharisees. The Pharisees are like the religious academia of the Jewish culture in the day. If it's not too mind-boggling, it's okay, else it's heresy!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="timewerx, post: 70415222, member: 314730"] I'm an inventor of some sort and upon studying the rules of patenting, I discovered there are certain inventions that can never patented: - Mainly inventions that appear to violate the laws of nature. Such notion actually contradicts quantum level physics in that the laws of nature are routinely violated at the quantum level. It's an obsolete/out-dated ruling! I have an invention based on quantum level phenomena that may appear to violate the laws of nature. What now? So I couldn't patent it. I even presented the concept to a forum staffed by PhD holders from respectable research institutions in USA like MIT and I was swiftly dismissed and banned. I have other plans to get my invention to public attention. My point is that the academia does have some very ugly sides to it. They are not objective all the time, even unfairly biased, very close-minded, corrupt(!), elitists/too proud all of which are counterproductive to the advancement of science and technology. If you have something quite radical, expect to be like Jesus facing the Pharisees. The Pharisees are like the religious academia of the Jewish culture in the day. If it's not too mind-boggling, it's okay, else it's heresy! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
The more education I get, the less decisive I become
Top
Bottom