Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
The Modern Era Scientist don't help me, but I still have my faith in God
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AV1611VET" data-source="post: 76782502" data-attributes="member: 152669"><p>A couple of things here:</p><p></p><p><strong>Number One</strong>: Every Christian who ever lived, alive today, and will be alive tomorrow believes IN THE BEGINNING, GOD.</p><p></p><p>That makes it 100% agreement.</p><p></p><p>But not all scientists believe IN THE BEGINNING, GOD.</p><p></p><p>So does that constitute "thinking they know more than any scientist on earth"?</p><p></p><p><strong>Number Two</strong>: You seem to think that, because we don't have agreement on issues of doctrine (like speaking in tongues, or pre-trib rapture, or whatever), that that is some kind of selling point for challenging our belief in God.</p><p></p><p>Where do you get that idea?</p><p></p><p>Do you expect me to have cognitive dissonance about God's existence, if I think the Flood was global, and someone else thinks it was local?</p><p></p><p>Whether it was global <u>or</u> local, the fact of the matter is: we believe God did it.</p><p></p><p>So what excuse does the scientific community (as a whole) have for not believing in God, if they want to use "lack of consensus of opinion" against us?</p><p></p><p>If they can't see Him in a telescope, do they expect us not to see Him in our hearts?</p><p></p><p><strong>Number Three:</strong> Do scientists think they know more than we commoners do?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AV1611VET, post: 76782502, member: 152669"] A couple of things here: [B]Number One[/B]: Every Christian who ever lived, alive today, and will be alive tomorrow believes IN THE BEGINNING, GOD. That makes it 100% agreement. But not all scientists believe IN THE BEGINNING, GOD. So does that constitute "thinking they know more than any scientist on earth"? [B]Number Two[/B]: You seem to think that, because we don't have agreement on issues of doctrine (like speaking in tongues, or pre-trib rapture, or whatever), that that is some kind of selling point for challenging our belief in God. Where do you get that idea? Do you expect me to have cognitive dissonance about God's existence, if I think the Flood was global, and someone else thinks it was local? Whether it was global [U]or[/U] local, the fact of the matter is: we believe God did it. So what excuse does the scientific community (as a whole) have for not believing in God, if they want to use "lack of consensus of opinion" against us? If they can't see Him in a telescope, do they expect us not to see Him in our hearts? [B]Number Three:[/B] Do scientists think they know more than we commoners do? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
The Modern Era Scientist don't help me, but I still have my faith in God
Top
Bottom