Unlike scientists, I don't pass along stories as fact that I can't prove. But I can tell you one thing; my great, great, great, great, great, great great grandmother was a human, not an unknown species.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Ok Describe your Great Great Great Great Great Great Great Grandmother.
What color eyes did she have ?
How Tall was She ?
How much did she weigh ?
What was her BMI at her Time Of Death.
If you can't answer this then please retract your statment, or admit you don't have a Great Great Great Great Great Great Great Grandmother, and that you don't exist.
I appreciate your kindness. Since I've been to most atheists sites on the web, I know how they are and that the only refutations they have to my posts are statements such as; "You're a moron."That's the first sign that one cannot defend his position. But the bible tells us about them so all they do is prove that the bible is true.
Unlike scientists, I don't pass along stories as fact that I can't prove.
Hmmm, new poster, 3 threads, all virtually identical, all inflammatory, not adding anything to subsequent discussion other than "na na na na".
Yup, remember people - only YOU can prevent internet trolling... by not feeding them.
Wow thanks for trolling my response and everyone elses response. I personally think my response was more the adequate, the poster I quoted suggested science is invalid since it can't prove what it claims. Isn't a request for that person to then prove what they claim to be valid?
Did you start 3/4 threads? My response was aimed at the OP. No matter how much good evidence you and others show them they'll never change.
So let's move on to the squirrels.
Ahh, you said "new poster" right after my first post on this thread so I thought you implied me, since you didn't I apologize and forget what I saidWe are in agreement.
Hmmm, new poster, 3 threads, all virtually identical, all inflammatory, not adding anything to subsequent discussion other than "na na na na".
Yup, remember people - only YOU can prevent internet trolling... by not feeding them.
As usual, when people can't defend their position, they begin personally attacking the poster whose posts they can't refute. Sorry, but that doesn't change the fact that evolutionists don't have 2 ends of the chain and thus can't know what kind of link they're looking for until they know who the common ancestor was. So I can see why you don't stick to the topic.
Yet there are mutations in every new generation, and over time these mutations build up, so that while you are the same species as your grandmother, and your grandmother the same species as HER grandmother... your great great <snip> great great great <snip> great grandmother was genetically different wnough from you to be considered a different sub spoecies, and HER great great <snip> great<snip> great grandmother was genetically different enough from her to be ANOTHER subspecies, and different enough from YOU to be an ENTIRELY different species.Unlike scientists, I don't pass along stories as fact that I can't prove. But I can tell you one thing; my great, great, great, great, great, great great grandmother was a human, not an unknown species.That's because unlike scientists, I know why humans can only breed humans.
Hold on... ridiculous overuse of smilies... weird fixation on the idea that there is ONE common ancestor... Carico, is that you?A link in a chain is always something in the middle linking one end of a chain to the other. But since scientists don't know who the common ancestor is, then they only have one end of the chain, namely, humans, not both. So until they know who the common ancestor is, they can't possibly know what the links of the chain lead to on the other end!
Thus, they find any bones they want to and claim it's the missing link.the latest "missing link" looks more like a lizard than a human. So are they now claiming that a giant lizard was the common ancestor? Or, since they don't know who the common ancestor is, because he's as imaginary as each individual imagination then they can claim that the bones of any animal is the common ancestor? Or can they just plain claim anything they want to since the world believes they're infallible gods because they have degrees? I suspect it's the latter.
Hold on... ridiculous overuse of smilies... weird fixation on the idea that there is ONE common ancestor... Carico, is that you?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?