Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
The Logic of the ACLU
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ThatRobGuy" data-source="post: 59342840" data-attributes="member: 123415"><p>If no one alive today was around to witness either event, then they're two theories. </p><p> </p><p>There are things that scientists accept as facts that support evolution, there are things that people of faith accept as facts that support ID. Event a staunch atheist/evolutionist like Sam Harris has openly said in his speeches that the scientific process is a humbling one in which you learn something tomorrow that completely changes what you thought you knew today and also stated in his own words that evolution is a Scientific theory and always will be since we're missing one critical thing...observation of the entire process itself. He, like you, and I, and most other atheists feel that the findings in nature more strongly support the evolution side of the debate where others see it a different way.</p><p> </p><p>Ignorance is strong term to use especially when talking about one particular theory vs. theory scenario in which the topic itself has no direct impact on IQ or the ability to learn.</p><p> </p><p>Regardless of which side is right, the ACLU and/or federal government is overstepping their bounds by making a distinction in favor of either side.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ThatRobGuy, post: 59342840, member: 123415"] If no one alive today was around to witness either event, then they're two theories. There are things that scientists accept as facts that support evolution, there are things that people of faith accept as facts that support ID. Event a staunch atheist/evolutionist like Sam Harris has openly said in his speeches that the scientific process is a humbling one in which you learn something tomorrow that completely changes what you thought you knew today and also stated in his own words that evolution is a Scientific theory and always will be since we're missing one critical thing...observation of the entire process itself. He, like you, and I, and most other atheists feel that the findings in nature more strongly support the evolution side of the debate where others see it a different way. Ignorance is strong term to use especially when talking about one particular theory vs. theory scenario in which the topic itself has no direct impact on IQ or the ability to learn. Regardless of which side is right, the ACLU and/or federal government is overstepping their bounds by making a distinction in favor of either side. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
The Logic of the ACLU
Top
Bottom