Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I've never seen an argument from "Dawson's Creek" before, so you've got that going for you.
And your experience on this is what exactly?
Citing Dawson's Creek does nothing to oppose my view, and seemingly others too, that you're talking a load of crank and any book you have the temerity to publish on this topic would also be a load of crank.
The place of the citation seems to be the sticking point, not the quotation itself. Interesting.
Where did I say I was thinking of publishing? In fact, since thinking "inside the box" is what generally gets published...
And why the phrase "temerity to publish"? Would the boxed-up people arrive with pitchforks?
Comes across as a desire from you to want to publish a book on the subject.Unlike the book-writers, I don't need to seek approval to get published. Therefore, I don't have to believe what a gang of scholars have to say
In that respect, write all your stuff into a book and publish it. Stop peeing and get off the pot, if you think this stuff is actually worth publishing. I'll wait for the reviews to come in though since I'm glad I'm getting this stuff for free on here.
That's not how any science works.I agree with your German thinking thing... "method" is all over President Trump. Kinda reminds me of the old 3 Stooges routine featuring the phrase "Step by step, inch by inch..."
I disagree with your take on Archaeologists, though. They are told where to go and what to look for by some Wizard of Oz behind the curtain.
A good reason not to trust the history presented in the Bible, for now we are left with confusing terminology regarding "Hittites" where the widely known "Hittite Empire" has nothing to to with Biblical references to Hittites.Take for example Sayce's astonishment when they found the Hittites in Asia Minor, rather than in what's called Palestine today. And a well-known Archaeology writer backs it up by showing Gergashites (sp?) in Asia Minor, too. In fact, the best examples of jumping to conclusions by Archaeologists is HOW they named the conquerors of the Hittite kingdom by the name of the conquested... and never changed it. All they did is confuse history by naming the Hittites the Hatti. Two identical names in two different languages, for two very different people.
Schliefmann's discovery of Wilusa does in one of the layers seem to be the city that inspired the legend of Troy. He was also a fairly early worker in the field without training.And how Schliemann blew up several layers of cities to get to what he pretended was Troy.
I would recommend using the names peoples called themselves and their cities when we can clearly identify them.Archaeology is full to the brim with these "systematic" methods. Who really knew where the places were that were described by the ancient authors? But one thing is sure, the modern place-names don't always match their ancient descriptions.
I would recommend using the names peoples called themselves and their cities when we can clearly identify them.
Well, hundreds of years before historical records were kept (or, at least, survived) in the British Isles. The Druids originated in the Iron Age, so say around 500 BCE. Thus, their alleged association with the building of numerous Neolithic and Bronze Age megaliths is purest fantasy. The nutters** who turn up for the Summer Solstice at Stonehenge are the original practitioners of cultural appropriation!
** It's a technical term in anthropology.
That's not how any science works.
So you deny that scientists start with a theory, and then prove it. Do they find out things by mistake?
Oh but that's too easy! There's no angle to exploit!
Hypothesis. Not a theory. Science starts with a hypothesis, which then becomes a theory.
The so-called metal "Ages" happened at different times in different places. The Druids may have been spoken of by that name during the time of the Roman Empire, but that doesn't mean they "originated" in that time.
If anything, the late-coming Celtic-speaking people are earlier "practitioners of cultural appropriation".
"Bertrand and Reinach both maintain the pre-Celtic origin of Druidism."
--Wright, Druidism the Ancient Faith of Britain
"so we must pass on to the non-Celtic natives, who had another religion, namely, druidism, which may be surmised to have had its origin among them."--Rhys, Celtic Britain, p.69
"Professor Rhys goes so far as to refer Druidism to the Silurian race, because Caesar mentions Britain as the birthplace of that cultus, and it is of a character which he considers non-Aryan. It is almost certain that second-sight and other ecstatic moods must be referred to the pre-Celtic races."--MacBain, Celtic Mythology and Religion
"The monuments we call Druidical, must be appropriated, exclusively, to the Aborigines of the midland, and western divisions. They are found in such corners, and fastnesses, as have, in all ages, and countries, been the last retreat of the conquered, and the last that are occupied by the victorious."--Davies, Celtic Researches
"The Celtic invaders of Britain did not create Druidism, and, neolithic or not, it was at all events pre-Celtic."--Holmes, Caesar's Conquest
Therefore, who are the "non-Celtic natives" of Britain?
"Strabo reports of Posidonius ... 'The Cassiterides are ten in number, and lie near each other in the ocean, towards the north from the haven of the Artabri: one of them is desert, but the others are inhabited by men in black cloaks, clad in tunics reaching to the feet, and girt about the breast; walking with staves, and bearded like goats. They subsist by their cattle, leading for the most part a wandering life. And having metals of tin and lead, these and skins they barter with the merchants for earthenware and salt, and brazen vessels.' ...
Solinus ... states that 'a stormy channel separates the coast which the Damnonii occupy from the island Silura, whose inhabitants preserve the ancient manners, reject money, barter merchandise, value what they require by exchange rather than by price, worship the gods, and both men and women profess a knowledge of the future.'"
--Skene, Celtic Scotland,v1
"The wide extension of the Ligues westward is in agreement with the language of Eratosthenes. According to Strabo (2. i. 40, p. 92) this old geographer taught that there were three forelands projecting from the north—the Peloponnesian, the Italian, and the Ligurian—between the first and second of which lay the Adriatic, and between the second and third the Tyrrhenian Sea. When we remember the high reputation and the real merits of Eratosthenes, it is astonishing how little attention has been drawn to the fact that he calls the Spanish peninsula the Ligurian."
--Guest, Origines Celtae
"The swarthy complexion and curled hair of the Silures, together with their situation opposite to Spain, render it probable that a colony of the ancient Iberi possessed themselves of that territory."
--Tacitus, Agricola
These are the indigenous people of Western Europe who had the stone circles and nemetons, and the Druids. The Celtic language evolved from the Ligurian, and IMO, is proven by Whatmough and Sims-Williams.
For once, we agree. Science has an agenda... which you seem to be calling an "angle to exploit". Ancient Science used to be part of Philosophy...
Schliefmann's discovery of Wilusa does in one of the layers seem to be the city that inspired the legend of Troy. He was also a fairly early worker in the field without training.
Does Science find out things by mistake, or are they looking to prove what they think?
Thank you for confirming your ignorance.So you deny that scientists start with a theory, and then prove it. Do they find out things by mistake?
I'm not interested in how he picked his wife.If memory serves, Schilemann was a gold-digger.
Why do you refuse to use any book written in the last half century?
Celtic Researchs is from 1804. Why is that more trustworthy to you than anything written in the 1990s or the 2000s?
The so-called metal "Ages" happened at different times in different places. The Druids may have been spoken of by that name during the time of the Roman Empire, but that doesn't mean they "originated" in that time.
If anything, the late-coming Celtic-speaking people are earlier "practitioners of cultural appropriation".
"Bertrand and Reinach both maintain the pre-Celtic origin of Druidism."
--Wright, Druidism the Ancient Faith of Britain
"so we must pass on to the non-Celtic natives, who had another religion, namely, druidism, which may be surmised to have had its origin among them."--Rhys, Celtic Britain, p.69
"Professor Rhys goes so far as to refer Druidism to the Silurian race, because Caesar mentions Britain as the birthplace of that cultus, and it is of a character which he considers non-Aryan. It is almost certain that second-sight and other ecstatic moods must be referred to the pre-Celtic races."--MacBain, Celtic Mythology and Religion
"The monuments we call Druidical, must be appropriated, exclusively, to the Aborigines of the midland, and western divisions. They are found in such corners, and fastnesses, as have, in all ages, and countries, been the last retreat of the conquered, and the last that are occupied by the victorious."--Davies, Celtic Researches
"The Celtic invaders of Britain did not create Druidism, and, neolithic or not, it was at all events pre-Celtic."--Holmes, Caesar's Conquest
Therefore, who are the "non-Celtic natives" of Britain?
"Strabo reports of Posidonius ... 'The Cassiterides are ten in number, and lie near each other in the ocean, towards the north from the haven of the Artabri: one of them is desert, but the others are inhabited by men in black cloaks, clad in tunics reaching to the feet, and girt about the breast; walking with staves, and bearded like goats. They subsist by their cattle, leading for the most part a wandering life. And having metals of tin and lead, these and skins they barter with the merchants for earthenware and salt, and brazen vessels.' ...
Solinus ... states that 'a stormy channel separates the coast which the Damnonii occupy from the island Silura, whose inhabitants preserve the ancient manners, reject money, barter merchandise, value what they require by exchange rather than by price, worship the gods, and both men and women profess a knowledge of the future.'"
--Skene, Celtic Scotland,v1
"The wide extension of the Ligues westward is in agreement with the language of Eratosthenes. According to Strabo (2. i. 40, p. 92) this old geographer taught that there were three forelands projecting from the north—the Peloponnesian, the Italian, and the Ligurian—between the first and second of which lay the Adriatic, and between the second and third the Tyrrhenian Sea. When we remember the high reputation and the real merits of Eratosthenes, it is astonishing how little attention has been drawn to the fact that he calls the Spanish peninsula the Ligurian."
--Guest, Origines Celtae
"The swarthy complexion and curled hair of the Silures, together with their situation opposite to Spain, render it probable that a colony of the ancient Iberi possessed themselves of that territory."
--Tacitus, Agricola
These are the indigenous people of Western Europe who had the stone circles and nemetons, and the Druids. The Celtic language evolved from the Ligurian, and IMO, is proven by Whatmough and Sims-Williams.
I'm not interested in how he picked his wife.
Heinrich Schliemann? All I know about him is that he had the obsession to find Troy and the money to dig when he found it and that he was an amateur who caused a lot of destruction that would not occur in a modern excavation.Surely You've heard of the books that tell of his part in the California Gold Rush?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?