• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

The Last Samurai

Nightwing

Active Member
Nov 29, 2004
343
9
39
New York
✟528.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I rewatched this a few days ago after buying it on DVD ( I watched it on DVD when it was intitially released) and it is a really great movie with the hollywoodesque ending being the only thing that bothered me. I wouldn't call this movie a "war movie", but a character study focusing on both the physical and the mental. The action sequences weren't there just to people could see intense amounts of violence. They had purpose, mainly for Tom Cruise's character. I also watched the movie with the commentary by Edward Zwick (the director) and he talks in detail about the message of the entire movie, the characters, and the story). The acting is impeccable, even by Tom Cruise and Ken Watanabe. This film made me understand and appreciate the way of the Samurai more. If only America could practice the way of the Samurai (minus the suicide for shame act), what an improvement the USA would be.
 

Kripost

Senior Veteran
Mar 23, 2004
2,085
84
46
✟2,681.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Nightwing said:
I rewatched this a few days ago after buying it on DVD ( I watched it on DVD when it was intitially released) and it is a really great movie with the hollywoodesque ending being the only thing that bothered me. I wouldn't call this movie a "war movie", but a character study focusing on both the physical and the mental. The action sequences weren't there just to people could see intense amounts of violence. They had purpose, mainly for Tom Cruise's character. I also watched the movie with the commentary by Edward Zwick (the director) and he talks in detail about the message of the entire movie, the characters, and the story). The acting is impeccable, even by Tom Cruise and Ken Watanabe. This film made me understand and appreciate the way of the Samurai more. If only America could practice the way of the Samurai (minus the suicide for shame act), what an improvement the USA would be.

While I liked the cinematographt and elaborate sets, I disliked the inaccurate potrayal of the samura, besides the ending. These are my objections:

1) Ever since the bakumatsu, a modernized army and navy has been in place, modelled after the Prussian and the French. They were the force which defeated the Tokugawa Shogunate in the first place, and most of the officers were samurai, or of samurai descent.

2) Contrary to what is commonly thought, although the class system has been abolished, and wearing of swords and topknot were outlawed, most of the people in the government are samurai. For example, the police force were mostly samurai. So it does not make sense to say that the Meiji gicernment wants to kill samurai.

3) Contrary to what is shown in the movie, samurai did used guns since the Onin war, and was regarded as a legitimate weapon.

4) During the Satsuma rebellion, led by Saigo Takamori (whom Ken Watanabe's character was based on), his army had modern arms, including cannons, and they were a real threat to the imperial army.

5) As a kendo and iaido student, I find that some of the sword techniques are too flashy to be usable. Furthermore, no matter how fit a person is, wearing armour needs time to get used to, and is certainly uncomfortable.

6) What is commonly known as bushido is a romantization of the past, there is no single set of values called bushido until the peaceful Togugawa period, when many samurai became scholars and administrators. It was only in the Meiji era when Inazo Nitobe wrote a book about Bushido when the idea really crystalized.

On another note, while it is quite easy to find a link between Katsumoto in the film and the real Saigo Takamori; the historical counterpart of villian, Omura is more difficult to determine. My guess is the real Prime Minister, Okubo Toshimichi based on physical similarity (which could be coincidental) and the fact that he is the most powerful person in government. The only thing I cannot figure out is that Okubo Toshimichi was not that radical...

Lastly, my main gripe is that based on what they watched on the movie, there was a larger influx of students in my current and previous kendo dojo, onlt to have most of them drop out after finding out it is not quite what they expected.
 
Upvote 0