Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
The Known Facts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JGG" data-source="post: 24035619" data-attributes="member: 142591"><p>Just for the record, I seriously question your first two premises to be in any way factual, and I can conclude that I should also question any conclusion you draw from them.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>How is something which is 100% reliable open to interpretation? If it can be interpreted in more than one way, it is far less than 100% reliable. Misinterpret it and its not reliable.</p><p> </p><p>Just wanted that for the record, but I'm sure its been pointed out.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>What kind of results?</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Firstly, what kind of results? Secondly, testimony from a highly biased group of people does not constitue much in the way of evidence. Thirdly, I can make the same claim about Buddhism, and thus refute your Christian testimony.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>What kind of results?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JGG, post: 24035619, member: 142591"] Just for the record, I seriously question your first two premises to be in any way factual, and I can conclude that I should also question any conclusion you draw from them. How is something which is 100% reliable open to interpretation? If it can be interpreted in more than one way, it is far less than 100% reliable. Misinterpret it and its not reliable. Just wanted that for the record, but I'm sure its been pointed out. What kind of results? Firstly, what kind of results? Secondly, testimony from a highly biased group of people does not constitue much in the way of evidence. Thirdly, I can make the same claim about Buddhism, and thus refute your Christian testimony. What kind of results? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
The Known Facts
Top
Bottom