• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

The impact of YEC'ism

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vance

Contributor
Jul 16, 2003
6,666
264
60
✟38,280.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Over in the C&E forum, I asked the following question:

Assuming for the sake of argument that you were open to the idea of Christian belief, but did not know about a Theistic Evolution alternative, would the dogmatic teaching of Young Earth Creationism make it more likely that you would consider Christianity or less so?

I also asked
What about Theistic Evolution? Being aware of Theistic Evolution (which I am sure most of you here are), would this viewpoint make you more likely or less likely to consider Christianity?

Here are some of the responses:

“The introduction of dogmatic YEC teachings is one of the things that turned me away from my church and started me on the journey towards atheism.”

“I would think a lot less of christianity if TE was not an option.”

“I was in the process of reading the Bible from front to back when the YEC teachings swept through my church. I was already way past Genesis and had frankly never taken a literal approach to those texts. (Nor had my Bible teacher in the church...or others with whom I discussed Genesis.) It's like someone else here said, I really didn't give much of a hoot about the origin of species until YECism was crammed down my throat. It wasn't a question I worried about. I learned very limited basics about evolution in school and never gave it much thought until I was exposed to what I saw as flat out propaganda, junk science and false allegations. I guess what I'm trying to say, and badly, is that the only thing that caused me to have more than a passing interest in evolution at all was how horrified I was by the narrow-mindedness and often flat out lying of the YEC movement.”

“YECism was the large and powerful stepping stone that led me out of christianity. I have no doubt that I would still be a christian if it wasn't for YEC.”

“If YECism was the only option, I would reject all of Christianity as a cult. . . . Origins is a huge issue for me. TE existing as an option for belief, as an alternative to YECism, makes me see Christianity as a legitimate religion instead of a cult.”

“If YECism was the only option, there would be zero chance of me ever becoming a Christian again . . .”

“YEC and a literal interpretation of the Bible were two reasons for my eventual deconversion from Christianity. Not the only reasons and not even the most important reasons, but definitely two of the first reasons. So I'd have to say that YEC would still make me far less likely to consider Christianity again.”

“Considering the sheer absurdity (and the dishonesty routinely used to promote that nonsense) of "scientific" (ha!) creationism, anyone who starts to insist on any kind of creationism has a very good chance of making me reject fully whatever faith he tries to "sell" to me.”

“i never cared about the origins question when I first became a christian... when YEC was presented to me (and it was official doctrine of my church) i became a little confused. Then I saw Kent Hovind and realized that I could not be a Christian any longer...”

“if YEC was the only Christian option, then I would think of Christianity what I think of the Heaven's Gate Cult.”

“TE for sure. As an agnostic I am not closed to the idea that there is a higher power. So any religious view that "jives" with the actual observable universe would be highly favored.”

“In light of the evidence as I understand it, less so.” [referring to YEC'ism].

Most said that while the TE option would be more likely to allow them to even consider Christianity, it would not likely be enough. Still, a crack in the door is better than the slamming shut that YEC'ism causes.
 

SBG

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2005
849
28
51
✟23,655.00
Faith
Lutheran
Politics
US-Republican
The Lady Kate said:
:amen:

Faith is supposed to be belief without evidence, not belief in spite of evidence.

There are two sides. One side states they have all the evidence for them. The other side states they have the evidence for their belief as well.

So, from your side of belief, stating YECs have no evidence for their belief, wouldn't that agree with your statement that Faith is suppose to be belief without evidence?
 
Upvote 0

gluadys

Legend
Mar 2, 2004
12,958
682
Toronto
✟39,020.00
Faith
Protestant
Politics
CA-NDP
SBG said:
There are two sides. One side states they have all the evidence for them. The other side states they have the evidence for their belief as well.

So, from your side of belief, stating YECs have no evidence for their belief, wouldn't that agree with your statement that Faith is suppose to be belief without evidence?

Read Lady Kate's statement again. The problem for YECism is not that it has no evidence. Faith can deal with that. YEC's problem is that YECism requires faith in spite of the evidence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CEV
Upvote 0

jasperbound

The Fragile Incarnate
May 20, 2005
3,395
95
Modesto, CA
Visit site
✟4,138.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
If TE is the reasonable alternative, then I think I'll denounce Christianity right now, because the Genesis "parable" doesn't even get the order of creation right (according to man's idea of creation). Surely an omniscient god would know that plants did not precede the sun!
 
Upvote 0

gluadys

Legend
Mar 2, 2004
12,958
682
Toronto
✟39,020.00
Faith
Protestant
Politics
CA-NDP
jasperbound said:
If TE is the reasonable alternative, then I think I'll denounce Christianity right now, because the Genesis "parable" doesn't even get the order of creation right (according to man's idea of creation). Surely an omniscient god would know that plants did not precede the sun!


This is exactly the attitude that distinguishes YECs from TEs. YECs would abandon Christianity if their interpretation of the bible proves wrong. TEs refuse to abandon Christianity because one interpretation of scripture is falsified.

It also explains the common YEC perception that TEs are dismissing the bible. Because that is what YECs will do if their interpretation is not upheld. So they project their own reaction onto TEs and claim that is what TEs are doing, when in fact the basis of TE is to embrace all of God's truth, scriptural and scientific together.

Why should a "parable" get the order scientifically right? Why does a theologically "right order" have to match a scientific "right order"? How do you know that in God's perspective the Genesis order is not exactly right for its intended purpose, even though it does not match the scientific chronology?
 
Upvote 0

gluadys

Legend
Mar 2, 2004
12,958
682
Toronto
✟39,020.00
Faith
Protestant
Politics
CA-NDP
SBG said:
And is it not your claim that YECs have no evidence?

From a YEC perspective the evidence a TE claims is there for their point of view, is merely just their interpretation.

Perhaps we are talking different sets of evidence. I was referring to the fact that YEC requires faith in spite of scientific evidence to the contrary, e.g. re: the global flood or the age of the earth.
 
Upvote 0

vossler

Senior Veteran
Jul 20, 2004
2,760
158
64
Asheville NC
✟27,263.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
After going to the C&E forum and reading the responses I must say I don't think YECs were the primary reason anyone "left the faith" or rejected Jesus. Whenever I read about someone leaving Christianity I'm immediately suspect of their "Christianity," and reading those responses did little to change that.

I like to look at the YEC vs. TE debate from the perspective of which one does the world more readily embrace. From that viewpoint its no surprise to read some of the posted quotes. Clearly these are the type of responses one would expect from carnal lost people. Isn't this why Jesus said "wide is the gate and broad is the path that leads to distruction and many are those that enter by it." Most of them are not here seeking truth but are agents of the enemy sent to keep others from finding the truth. When one looks at it like this its easy to clearly see what's going on.
 
Upvote 0

jasperbound

The Fragile Incarnate
May 20, 2005
3,395
95
Modesto, CA
Visit site
✟4,138.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
gluadys said:
This is exactly the attitude that distinguishes YECs from TEs. YECs would abandon Christianity if their interpretation of the bible proves wrong. TEs refuse to abandon Christianity because one interpretation of scripture is falsified.

It's not because one interpretation of Scripture is falsified. It's because one interpretation of Scripture is falsified, and the other makes absolutely no sense.

gluadys said:
It also explains the common YEC perception that TEs are dismissing the bible. Because that is what YECs will do if their interpretation is not upheld. So they project their own reaction onto TEs and claim that is what TEs are doing, when in fact the basis of TE is to embrace all of God's truth, scriptural and scientific together.

Why should a "parable" get the order scientifically right? Why does a theologically "right order" have to match a scientific "right order"? How do you know that in God's perspective the Genesis order is not exactly right for its intended purpose, even though it does not match the scientific chronology?

Why should a parable about the creation of the universe be so wrong in its order? If there's a purpose for God getting the chronological order wrong, then what is it? If you don't know the order and are merely suggesting it to justify God's apparent inability to account the beginning of creation (according to science), then I won't be a TE or a YEC. I'll make up my own interpretation that too makes the first chapter of Genesis completely irrelevant. Then again, why stop there? I'm sure one could argue that the entire Bible is a parable, including Jesus dying for our sins.

I'm sorry, but I'm not going to tolerate mistakes from a perfect God. Surely God, being perfect, won't hate me for expecting him not to make mistakes.
 
Upvote 0

jasperbound

The Fragile Incarnate
May 20, 2005
3,395
95
Modesto, CA
Visit site
✟4,138.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
gluadys said:
Perhaps we are talking different sets of evidence. I was referring to the fact that YEC requires faith in spite of scientific evidence to the contrary, e.g. re: the global flood or the age of the earth.

You mean that science has found the exact age of the Earth using repeatable and observable methods?
 
Upvote 0

SBG

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2005
849
28
51
✟23,655.00
Faith
Lutheran
Politics
US-Republican
I have seen numerous threads, just like this one, speaking about how YEC is the primary or main reason for people losing their faith. That if they hear about TEism they have a good chance of regaining or gaining faith in Jesus Christ.

Well first question would be, where does one suggest the power of conversion lies, in origins or Jesus Christ? And if it is in Jesus Christ, then origins does not bring people to faith nor is the main or primary reason for the loss of ones faith. If our faith is solely from Jesus Christ, origins then has nothing to do with keeping or gaining faith in Jesus Christ.

That being said, this whole thread is bunk.

But again, since TEs insist that YECism is the main reason why people don't come to faith in Jesus Christ or why people have lost their faith in Jesus Christ; are TEs using their common belief in evolution to evangelise to those who are lost?

Are TEs spending their time putting down YECs or reaching those who claim they lost faith or won't gain faith in Jesus Christ because of YEC?
 
Upvote 0

LewisWildermuth

Senior Veteran
May 17, 2002
2,526
128
53
Bloomington, Illinois
✟26,875.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
SBG said:
Let me ask this then. Since, by your accounts that these people will accept Christianity because of the TE belief, are you evangelizing to those people?

Yes we do. YECists do not corner the market in evangelizing just as they do not corner the market on prayer, faith, Bible study, etc. etc. like some here seem to imply.

The hardest part of being a TE is that you have to fight a battle on two fronts, against those who question ones faith because they do not interpret things the same way and against those who hold no faith. Dealing with a militant atheist is almost exactly like dealing with militant YECists, you have to show that engrained ideas about what it means to be a Christian are not the only way to look at things. Once that stumbling block is cleared the interaction becomes much more civil and personal witnessing becomes possible. I do not do much of the latter on-line because I find it much easier and more fruitful to talk one on one in person.
 
Upvote 0

gluadys

Legend
Mar 2, 2004
12,958
682
Toronto
✟39,020.00
Faith
Protestant
Politics
CA-NDP
jasperbound said:
It's not because one interpretation of Scripture is falsified. It's because one interpretation of Scripture is falsified, and the other makes absolutely no sense.

Whether it makes sense to you or not is irrelevant. If it made sense to the first readers, that is what counts.


Why should a parable about the creation of the universe be so wrong in its order? If there's a purpose for God getting the chronological order wrong, then what is it? If you don't know the order and are merely suggesting it to justify God's apparent inability to account the beginning of creation (according to science), then I won't be a TE or a YEC. I'll make up my own interpretation that too makes the first chapter of Genesis completely irrelevant.

Because there are other orders than chronological orders. The poetic & thematic order of the framework hypothesis makes sense to me. That the work of God on each creative day parallels the works of the pagan gods of Babylon in the order of the Babylonian creation story -- thus demonstrating that God alone is creator, creator of all the things for which the Babylonian gods were given credit -- makes sense to me. That the number of days is set at seven to explain the origin of the sabbath makes sense to me.


Then again, why stop there? I'm sure one could argue that the entire Bible is a parable, including Jesus dying for our sins.

Indeed one could argue that way, though I personally do not. But that is why God is known by faith and by the testimony of those who believe, while science depends on objective evidence.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.