Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Alan Templeton, also of Washington University, reported that a computer-based analysis of 10 different human DNA sequences indicates that there has been interbreeding between people living in Asia, Europe, and Africa for at least 600,000 years.
So my generalhrust on this is to get science people to agree with you, that what the bible says nseems true, whether they see things thru their Science or you stick with medieval ideas.
The bible pre dates medieval.They also found as transistional species too, which has been one of your issues with the ToE, right?
It was a partial skeleton of a 15-16 year old male Homo sapiens who lived about 30,000 years ago. He had a mix of old and new anatomical features. The skull had characteristics of both modern and archaic Homo sapiens.
This could be explained as the result of interbreeding with Neanderthals according to Erik Trinkaus of Washington University in St. Louis.
Alan Templeton, also of Washington University, reported that a computer-based analysis of 10 different human DNA sequences indicates that there has been interbreeding between people living in Asia, Europe, and Africa for at least 600,000 years
.
So my general thrust on this is to get science people to agree with you, that what the bible says nseems true, whether they see things thru their Science or you stick with medieval ideas.
If your first paragraph verifies scripture, then chapter and verse, please.
There was no global flood. That's not opinion. It's fact.
Ridiculous. There are no "founts of the deep". No place for oceans of water to come up from.
If it's not a repeatable experiment, then it's not even scientific.
Steps of the Scientific Method
Much less a fact.
You do know that they're not talking about a literal body of water, right? It's just hydrous mineral phases. What's more, the water in those minerals is not left over from your "founts of the deep," but is instead water leached out of subducting oceanic crust (i.e. bits of ocean water that were trapped and carried down by plate tectonics). In other words, it's surface water.So you argue that something that is "broken up" doesn't exist? Well duhhh.
But what if there was any remaining bodies of water?
Michael E. Wysession
Huge OceanDiscovered Inside Earth « CRISISBOOM
The KT layer. That is no better explained by your beliefs than the flood is it?Except the flood wasn't an experiment. It is, however, a testable hypothesis. And while it is impossible to prove a negative (i.e. a global flood never happened), none of the features predicted by a global flood hypothesis (that aren't explainable by other, observed, processes) can be found. Therefore, it is reasonable to state that a global flood never occurred.
I don't know anything about a K-T "layer." There's the K-T boundary, which is simply the boundary between the Cretaceous period and the Tertiary period. And since it's a creation of science, it is quite well-explained.The KT layer. That is no better explained by your beliefs than the flood is it?
False. It is a creation of forces that existed long before science did. It is also a layer, often of sediments. Your 'explanations' notwithstanding, it also happens to contain material found in space and deep under the earth.I don't know anything about a K-T "layer." There's the K-T boundary, which is simply the boundary between the Cretaceous period and the Tertiary period. And since it's a creation of science, it is quite well-explained.
Except the flood wasn't an experiment. It is, however, a testable hypothesis. And while it is impossible to prove a negative (i.e. a global flood never happened), none of the features predicted by a global flood hypothesis (that aren't explainable by other, observed, processes) can be found. Therefore, it is reasonable to state that a global flood never occurred.
I know what the article reads. I also know that Sci-Fi can be written in any way that seems to fit the facts. I was in Sci-Fi Club in Jr. High. You start with some confirmable facts and then weave your story around those facts in a convincing way. Thanks to that training, I never believed the early evolution stories as anything other than fiction. The best ones don't try to recreate history.You do know that they're not talking about a literal body of water, right? It's just hydrous mineral phases. What's more, the water in those minerals is not left over from your "founts of the deep," but is instead water leached out of subducting oceanic crust (i.e. bits of ocean water that were trapped and carried down by plate tectonics). In other words, it's surface water.
It rained Homos for 40 days and 40 nights, did it?The use of the word "flood" in the Bible refers to sudden amassings of multitudes of people.
This metaphor is a perfect analogy for the sudden rush of Modern Homo sapiens out of Africa into all the corners of the earth even to the highest hills and mountains, everywhere under heaven.
The use of the word "flood" in the Bible refers to sudden amassings of multitudes of people.
This metaphor is a perfect analogy for the sudden rush of Modern Homo sapiens out of Africa into all the corners of the earth even to the highest hills and mountains, everywhere under heaven.
Then, recent genetic tests tell us that indeed, all men alive today evidence in their Y-chromosome that they had one ancient common father, who lived 40,000 years ago,... very coincidentally again the same story of a Noah.
And as we all know, the Psalms tell us that a day to the lord could mean 1ooo years, which gives us the authroity to make the connection between 40 "days" and 40,000 years.
(And my previous statement, that says that interbreeding noted in the same story, Gen 6:4, has also been confirmed by computer based analysis and other genetic tests concerning our recessive Neanderthal genes).
It rained Homos for 40 days and 40 nights, did it?
Noah's flood was around 4,000 years ago. The ice age ended around 12,000 years ago. There was a LOT of flooding at the end of the Ice Age because the Ocean level went up quite a bit at the time.The flood is a good possible explanation for the ice age,
No, actually. Your dates are wrong. However, if there was some evidence of flooding after the ice age, we could look at that. Not sure how it would matter though.Noah's flood was around 4,000 years ago. The ice age ended around 12,000 years ago. There was a LOT of flooding at the end of the Ice Age because the Ocean level went up quite a bit at the time.
Noah's flood was around 4,000 years ago. The ice age ended around 12,000 years ago. There was a LOT of flooding at the end of the Ice Age because the Ocean level went up quite a bit at the time.
The use of the word "flood" in the Bible refers to sudden amassings of multitudes of people.
But when you combine "flood" with rain and rainbows and boats it helps to clear up any hallucinations.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?