- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
The so called science faith has no substance to it. The faith of our father's does.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The so called science faith has no substance to it. The faith of our father's does.Everything is faith, including your faith that you are awake.
Perhaps you need to answer that question.Does fooling yourself come easy or do you need to work at it?
Is that good or bad?
You hear the one about the blond that thought the ice age took a long time? But then someone explained that her fridge freezer was not the ice age. She went on to become a so called scientist. Now she wants to be a star.Considered good. But you make a good point.
Always consider the long term results.
You hear the one about the blond that thought the ice age took a long time? But then someone explained that her fridge freezer was not the ice age. She went on to become a so called scientist. Now she wants to be a star.
OK so the evos could not mount any case against a rapid cooling and layering. That is a good sign. If they had anything they would be all over it. ..pops champagne....Now we know..........the rest of the story.
Don't let Charlie make a monkey out of you. The rapid layering and freezing is the best explanation I have seen yet for the ice age. The animals fast evolving in that still different state after the flood is the only explanation a bible believer could embrace, I would think, and also the best explanation of the evidence.
It seems to have all the scientific support in the world! Nothing about the ice cores is not explainable this way.The rapid layering "explanation" has no scientific support.
I agree with you though that it is the only one a bible believer could embrace.
But I asked you this before, and will ask once again, why does a bible believer need a scientific explanation for acts of God? Isn't faith and the Bible good enough?
It seems to have all the scientific support in the world! Nothing about the ice cores is not explainable this way.
Great! So...bible believers, get with it. As you see, there is not a lot of ways to go here.
Science is merely a creature of this state. The act of God was not in this state. Is that hard to get? Why do you imagine that you can wave God and history away with present state anything?
Show us seasonal increments in ice at the very bottom?Lots about the ice cores is not explainable this way. Seasonal increments is one.
Real bible believers...so what does that make me??Real Bible believers (like our friend AV) say that science can take a hike. They don't try to twist science into what they believe.
You can't. Not when we leave this state.If science cant explain anything, why use science at all?
No need at all. Science is in this present time and state. No need at all to change that.Why is that so hard to get? Why change science to support your claims?
You should talk??Why do you answer questions with other questions?
If the flood was in a different nature and set of laws why would we call it an act of God? It was an act of God, but He acted in another nature. Try to get that.Give me an answer, why seek for scientific "explanations" for acts of God?
If the flood was in a different nature and set of laws why would we call it an act of God? It was an act of God, but He acted in another nature. Try to get that.
False. The act was in the former nature. The reason that we need to look at evidence is because we need to ask if the present natuure can be proven to be what goes all the way back to creation..or not.If it was an act of God you don't need to explain or look for evidence (or the lack thereof) in ice cores. Try to get that.
Don't let Charlie make a monkey out of you. The rapid layering and freezing is the best explanation I have seen yet for the ice age. The animals fast evolving in that still different state after the flood is the only explanation a bible believer could embrace, I would think, and also the best explanation of the evidence.
False. The act was in the former nature. The reason that we need to look at evidence is because we need to ask if the present natuure can be proven to be what goes all the way back to creation..or not.
Animals do "evolve" very fast. That's today, not in altered states.
Don't mistake Creationism sermons for what we can see today.
I did that for a while. The bible has no comment on biological
adaptation. It says that "kinds" were created. It doesn't say they
are unable to adapt to a degrading world. Just because evolution
has been used to draw the incorrect conclusion that it can create life
doesn't mean evolution doesn't happen, it just means man has
(once again) corrupted the understanding of something that God
has designed for good.
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1...ourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=superfast+evolution
There is when one wants it to be science. Your supposed present state season increments seem to be faith based. I asked for the evidence of them at the lowest parts of the ice cores. Guess you are cornered.There is no need to look at evidence when one has enough faith.
False. If we put say wolves, lions, sparrows, oxen, tigers, sheep, and horses in a zoo, how fast are you claiming they could evolve? If the commonly accepted date for the flood was something like 5000 years or 4500? Get serious.Animals do "evolve" very fast. That's today, not in altered states.
They were. Then they evolved from there.Don't mistake Creationism sermons for what we can see today.
I did that for a while. The bible has no comment on biological
adaptation. It says that "kinds" were created.
I can accept evolution as a created ability, and also very very fast evolving in the former state. It was not an altered state. We live in the altered state!It doesn't say they
are unable to adapt to a degrading world. Just because evolution
has been used to draw the incorrect conclusion that it can create life
doesn't mean evolution doesn't happen, it just means man has
(once again) corrupted the understanding of something that God
has designed for good.
False. If we put say wolves, lions, sparrows, oxen, tigers, sheep, and horses in a zoo, how fast are you claiming they could evolve? If the commonly accepted date for the flood was something like 5000 years or 4500? Get serious.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?